[App_rpt] progress and stability of asterisk and app_rpt

Steve Rodgers hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com
Tue Jul 4 02:41:58 UTC 2006


My personal opinion, is that you would probably be better off buying a 
solution from someone who you could hold accountable should the system fail 
at the worst possible moment. Sometimes there are reasons for going with a 
proprietary and costly solution. I believe your application is one where this 
would be the prudent thing to do.

Steve WA6ZFT

On Monday 03 July 2006 13:39, Eric Fort wrote:
> I am looking at asterisk and app_rpt as a solution for a ship to shore
> communications platform where safety of life and property may be an issue
> at times.  We will be using dispatch remote from multiple radio sites.
> Dispatch is now and would continue to be linked to the remotes via VoIP
> links.  at each site there is also phone patch capability for ship to shore
> phone calls, the main service offered, along with radios for amtor, telex,
> sitor, and pactor modes for data, email etc.  Is asterisk and app_rpt up to
> the task?  bottom line it just has to work.  Is it good enough that you
> would trust it to work if your boat was sinking and you needed a dispatcher
> to send help before the circling fishes found you tasty (propigation from
> dispatch to rescue not withstanding)?
>
> Eric



More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list