[App_rpt] progress and stability of asterisk and app_rpt

[Jim Duuuude]

We cant, and we are not going to leave letigousness out of this. Plain and 
simply, no matter what
else, if asked about use of our technology or products in any way that might 
put you, your customer, us or anyone else for that matter at risk of harm or 
liability due to failure or anything else,, thats the only answer youre 
going to get out of us. DONT DO IT!

Perhaps you need to ask a different question :-).


>From: "Eric Fort" <eric.fort at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: Asterisk Repeater Controler <app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>To: "Asterisk Repeater Controler" <app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>Subject: Re: [App_rpt] progress and stability of asterisk and app_rpt
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:15:28 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by 
>bay0-mc1-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Tue, 4 
>Jul 2006 00:26:12 -0700
>Received: (qmail 5531 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2006 06:15:31 -0000
>Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1)  by 0 with SMTP; 4 
>Jul 2006 06:15:31 -0000
>Received: (qmail 5522 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2006 06:15:29 -0000
>Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (64.233.166.182)by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jul 
>2006 06:15:29 -0000
>Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c39so1508182pydfor 
><app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: by 10.35.129.19 with SMTP id g19mr2070663pyn;Mon, 03 Jul 2006 
>23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: by 10.35.90.18 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
>X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW42rLVfBPSHRD3y9PJ6hjrcqa9Fx6tsctTc=
>Return-Path: <eric.fort at gmail.com>
>Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; 
>d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;b=e/+uWrwCgCQCBA2xea5ZayHy1klqiwazXCM3IkwEvGSajr4BK7+CXGCBWrMcs7zz+XzpH3rMgRqL/zhsIETxcoaB/ZLMx/g70DPH2sDPc0eTFUty7tA4tVOSAkOHfPWSOycLDqAbYM7qy2uL/JVxMQiVTEEguvtzWSyxU6f4igU=
>References: 
><2ad2af430607031339h3fc053edw7715303380da0342 at mail.gmail.com><200607031941.58987.hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com>
>X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler <app_rpt.lists.illiana.net>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt>,<mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.illiana.net/pipermail/app_rpt>
>List-Post: <mailto:app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>List-Help: <mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt>,<mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2006 07:26:13.0007 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[20DFE9F0:01C69F3B]
>
>Leaving letigousness out of this, how far off is asterisk and app_rpt from
>being there and what would it take to get it to this level of reliability
>and stability?  a bounty may be an option as well.
>
>Eric
>
>On 7/3/06, Steve Rodgers <hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>My personal opinion, is that you would probably be better off buying a
>>solution from someone who you could hold accountable should the system
>>fail
>>at the worst possible moment. Sometimes there are reasons for going with a
>>proprietary and costly solution. I believe your application is one where
>>this
>>would be the prudent thing to do.
>>
>>Steve WA6ZFT
>>
>>On Monday 03 July 2006 13:39, Eric Fort wrote:
>> > I am looking at asterisk and app_rpt as a solution for a ship to shore
>> > communications platform where safety of life and property may be an
>>issue
>> > at times.  We will be using dispatch remote from multiple radio sites.
>> > Dispatch is now and would continue to be linked to the remotes via VoIP
>> > links.  at each site there is also phone patch capability for ship to
>>shore
>> > phone calls, the main service offered, along with radios for amtor,
>>telex,
>> > sitor, and pactor modes for data, email etc.  Is asterisk and app_rpt 
>>up
>>to
>> > the task?  bottom line it just has to work.  Is it good enough that you
>> > would trust it to work if your boat was sinking and you needed a
>>dispatcher
>> > to send help before the circling fishes found you tasty (propigation
>>from
>> > dispatch to rescue not withstanding)?
>> >
>> > Eric
>>_______________________________________________
>>App_rpt mailing list
>>App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>>http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
>>


>_______________________________________________
>App_rpt mailing list
>App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt