[App_rpt] Node simulation?

[Gary]

Will a node simulation be able to work with a normal mode on the same 
asterisk box?

Node 1000 simulated
Node 1001 repeater
Node 1002 remote base

etc...

Gary
__________________________________________
Gary Young
Telecommunication Engineering Associates
Tel: 650.590.1802     Fax: 650.590.1872

Jim Duuuude wrote:
> Good news so far. I have a node up for experimentation purposes (node 2000). 
> Its at a colocation
> site in Downtown LA (lots of bandwith). It has no Zaptel hardware in it, 
> whatsoever.
> 
> To accomplish this:
> 
> Use an /etc/zaptel.conf that has no ports defined
> 
> modprobe ztdummy
> then ztcfg (again)
> 
> For some reason when ztcfg is run automatically by the modprobe, it gives an 
> error.  I dunno why
> but it works nontheless.
> 
> in the /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf do not define any ports, but do be sure you 
> define a line for
> pseudo.
> 
> For the rxchannel in rpt.conf, use Zap/pseudo. do not define a txchannel.
> 
> The latest version supports all of this without any changes.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> From: "Gary Young" <pcfrover at tcomeng.com>
>> Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler 
>> <app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>> To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" <app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>> Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Node simulation?
>> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:05:00 -0800
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by 
>> bay0-mc12-f19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Thu, 
>> 9 Nov 2006 08:03:07 -0800
>> Received: (qmail 14030 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2006 16:03:04 -0000
>> Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1)  by 0 with SMTP; 9 
>> Nov 2006 16:03:04 -0000
>> Received: (qmail 13968 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2006 16:03:00 -0000
>> Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (204.127.192.83)by 0 with SMTP; 9 Nov 
>> 2006 16:03:00 -0000
>> Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by 
>> comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTPid <20061109160259m1300mal7ie>; Thu, 9 Nov 
>> 2006 16:02:59 +0000
>> X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlK3oXsmRrh6gU=
>> Return-Path: <pcfrover at tcomeng.com>
>> Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>> thread-index: AccEFKSOXppF0jseRUC19JXuzLqMFQABBTeQ
>> X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
>> Precedence: list
>> List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler <app_rpt.lists.illiana.net>
>> List-Unsubscribe: 
>> <http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt>,<mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe>
>> List-Archive: <http://lists.illiana.net/pipermail/app_rpt>
>> List-Post: <mailto:app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>> List-Help: <mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe: 
>> <http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt>,<mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe>
>> Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2006 16:03:08.0497 (UTC) 
>> FILETIME=[8C6C1C10:01C70418]
>>
>> Cool, thanks!
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net
>>> [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:35 AM
>>> To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>>> Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Node simulation?
>>>
>>> I can and will easily find out if its feasable to do all and
>>> any of this
>>> with or without hardware
>>> (like maybe with use of the ztdummy driver). Give me a couple of days.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt mailing list
>> App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt mailing list
> App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
> http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt