From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 7 07:04:16 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:04:16 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? Message-ID: <010501c6e9de$cdc63b90$6301a8c0@DEN> Does anyone know where I can get a Doug Hall RBI-1 interface? They are no longer in production. Also is the FT897 the only radio supported with a Quad PCI board, or are there other radios with the same command structure? Thanks, Gary From telesistant at hotmail.com Sat Oct 7 08:49:03 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:49:03 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? In-Reply-To: <010501c6e9de$cdc63b90$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: Yes, the RBI-1 is a thing of the past, sorry. I would certainly imagine that the command structure of the FT-897/857/817 has got to be similar to some of their "bigger" radios. Also, in the new release that is about to be released, we support the Kenwood TM-G707 series (708, 700 etc) radios, and theoretically the D7 HT 144/440 radios using the Quad PCI card. >From: "Gary Young" >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > >To: >Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? >Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:04:16 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc8-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 7 >Oct 2006 00:04:20 -0700 >Received: (qmail 23496 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 07:04:19 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 7 >Oct 2006 07:04:19 -0000 >Received: (qmail 23487 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 07:04:17 -0000 >Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (204.127.200.85)by 0 with SMTP; 7 Oct >2006 07:04:17 -0000 >Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by >comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTPid <2006100707041601500mc89ge>; Sat, 7 Oct >2006 07:04:16 +0000 >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW40n1awjusdjyqDEZcQleF38hm6CS5pQDGQ= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >thread-index: Acbp3OCSZMQg7q8gQpWQCvAweoVofw== >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2006 07:04:20.0466 (UTC) >FILETIME=[CFC84D20:01C6E9DE] > >Does anyone know where I can get a Doug Hall RBI-1 interface? >They are no longer in production. > >Also is the FT897 the only radio supported with a Quad PCI board, or are >there other radios with the same command structure? > >Thanks, Gary > >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From gary at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 7 15:09:42 2006 From: gary at tcomeng.com (Gary) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:09:42 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <011001c6ea22$9dfd7920$6301a8c0@DEN> It happens I have a TM-D700 sitting here that is not being used. I will plan on getting a Quad PCI card and using this radio when the next version is released. To clarify, are you saying any of the FT-897/857/817 radios will work with the current version? Thanks, Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 1:49 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > > Yes, the RBI-1 is a thing of the past, sorry. > > I would certainly imagine that the command structure of the > FT-897/857/817 > has got to > be similar to some of their "bigger" radios. > > Also, in the new release that is about to be released, we support the > Kenwood TM-G707 > series (708, 700 etc) radios, and theoretically the D7 HT > 144/440 radios > using the > Quad PCI card. > > >From: "Gary Young" > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > >To: > >Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > >Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:04:16 -0700 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > >bay0-mc8-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 7 > >Oct 2006 00:04:20 -0700 > >Received: (qmail 23496 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > 07:04:19 -0000 > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > 0 with SMTP; 7 > >Oct 2006 07:04:19 -0000 > >Received: (qmail 23487 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > 07:04:17 -0000 > >Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (204.127.200.85)by 0 > with SMTP; 7 Oct > >2006 07:04:17 -0000 > >Received: from den > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > >comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTPid > <2006100707041601500mc89ge>; Sat, 7 Oct > >2006 07:04:16 +0000 > >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW40n1awjusdjyqDEZcQleF38hm6CS5pQDGQ= > >Return-Path: > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > >thread-index: Acbp3OCSZMQg7q8gQpWQCvAweoVofw== > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > >Precedence: list > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > >List-Unsubscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > >List-Archive: > >List-Post: > >List-Help: > >List-Subscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2006 07:04:20.0466 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[CFC84D20:01C6E9DE] > > > >Does anyone know where I can get a Doug Hall RBI-1 interface? > >They are no longer in production. > > > >Also is the FT897 the only radio supported with a Quad PCI > board, or are > >there other radios with the same command structure? > > > >Thanks, Gary > > > >_______________________________________________ > >App_rpt mailing list > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From telesistant at hotmail.com Sat Oct 7 17:40:22 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 10:40:22 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? In-Reply-To: <011001c6ea22$9dfd7920$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: Although we havent actually tested on the 817 and 857, according to documentation, it should work fine. All 3 of those radios are the same internal design, and most of the difference between them is physical and whats at the "business" end of the transmitter section. Frankly, I have never come across anyone, that, given the choice between the 3 radios, didnt pick the 897, given the minimal price difference between each of them. Since the software is still in "development" we still have to get access to a D708 and a D700 (geeze, theyre the same radio +/- the TNC, but I gotta test both to be completely thorough) to do final testing. I have been developing it on a G707, and that works great. Sure, if you already have a D700, then this would be a great use of it. >From: "Gary" >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base? >Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:09:42 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc7-f3.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 7 >Oct 2006 08:09:46 -0700 >Received: (qmail 17312 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 15:09:45 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 7 >Oct 2006 15:09:45 -0000 >Received: (qmail 17302 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 15:09:42 -0000 >Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (63.240.77.84)by 0 with SMTP; 7 Oct >2006 15:09:42 -0000 >Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by >comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTPid <2006100715094201400qq2uee>; Sat, 7 Oct >2006 15:09:42 +0000 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >thread-index: Acbp7XjP1l9WvWfSSVeLRVlgfbLJMgANELHg >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2006 15:09:46.0335 (UTC) >FILETIME=[A02736F0:01C6EA22] > >It happens I have a TM-D700 sitting here that is not being used. I will >plan >on getting a Quad PCI card and using this radio when the next version is >released. > >To clarify, are you saying any of the FT-897/857/817 radios will work with >the current version? > >Thanks, Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > > Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 1:49 AM > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > > > > Yes, the RBI-1 is a thing of the past, sorry. > > > > I would certainly imagine that the command structure of the > > FT-897/857/817 > > has got to > > be similar to some of their "bigger" radios. > > > > Also, in the new release that is about to be released, we support the > > Kenwood TM-G707 > > series (708, 700 etc) radios, and theoretically the D7 HT > > 144/440 radios > > using the > > Quad PCI card. > > > > >From: "Gary Young" > > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > > > >To: > > >Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > > >Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:04:16 -0700 > > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > > >bay0-mc8-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 7 > > >Oct 2006 00:04:20 -0700 > > >Received: (qmail 23496 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > > 07:04:19 -0000 > > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > > 0 with SMTP; 7 > > >Oct 2006 07:04:19 -0000 > > >Received: (qmail 23487 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > > 07:04:17 -0000 > > >Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (204.127.200.85)by 0 > > with SMTP; 7 Oct > > >2006 07:04:17 -0000 > > >Received: from den > > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > > >comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTPid > > <2006100707041601500mc89ge>; Sat, 7 Oct > > >2006 07:04:16 +0000 > > >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW40n1awjusdjyqDEZcQleF38hm6CS5pQDGQ= > > >Return-Path: > > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > > >thread-index: Acbp3OCSZMQg7q8gQpWQCvAweoVofw== > > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > > >Precedence: list > > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > > >List-Unsubscribe: > > >, > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > > >List-Archive: > > >List-Post: > > >List-Help: > > >List-Subscribe: > > >, > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2006 07:04:20.0466 (UTC) > > >FILETIME=[CFC84D20:01C6E9DE] > > > > > >Does anyone know where I can get a Doug Hall RBI-1 interface? > > >They are no longer in production. > > > > > >Also is the FT897 the only radio supported with a Quad PCI > > board, or are > > >there other radios with the same command structure? > > > > > >Thanks, Gary > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >App_rpt mailing list > > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From gary at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 7 17:57:19 2006 From: gary at tcomeng.com (Gary) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:57:19 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <012c01c6ea3a$08919840$6301a8c0@DEN> I would be glad to help out and test the new version on my D700 if you can't find any other way to verify compatibility. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 10:40 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > > Although we havent actually tested on the 817 and 857, according to > documentation, it should > work fine. All 3 of those radios are the same internal > design, and most of > the difference between > them is physical and whats at the "business" end of the > transmitter section. > Frankly, I have > never come across anyone, that, given the choice between the > 3 radios, didnt > pick the 897, > given the minimal price difference between each of them. > > Since the software is still in "development" we still have to > get access to > a D708 and a D700 > (geeze, theyre the same radio +/- the TNC, but I gotta test > both to be > completely > thorough) to do final testing. I have been developing it on a > G707, and that > works > great. > > Sure, if you already have a D700, then this would be a great > use of it. > > > > >From: "Gary" > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" > >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > >Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:09:42 -0700 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > >bay0-mc7-f3.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 7 > >Oct 2006 08:09:46 -0700 > >Received: (qmail 17312 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > 15:09:45 -0000 > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > 0 with SMTP; 7 > >Oct 2006 15:09:45 -0000 > >Received: (qmail 17302 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > 15:09:42 -0000 > >Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (63.240.77.84)by 0 with > SMTP; 7 Oct > >2006 15:09:42 -0000 > >Received: from den > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > >comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTPid > <2006100715094201400qq2uee>; Sat, 7 Oct > >2006 15:09:42 +0000 > >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= > >Return-Path: > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > >thread-index: Acbp7XjP1l9WvWfSSVeLRVlgfbLJMgANELHg > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > >Precedence: list > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > >List-Unsubscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > >List-Archive: > >List-Post: > >List-Help: > >List-Subscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2006 15:09:46.0335 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[A02736F0:01C6EA22] > > > >It happens I have a TM-D700 sitting here that is not being > used. I will > >plan > >on getting a Quad PCI card and using this radio when the > next version is > >released. > > > >To clarify, are you saying any of the FT-897/857/817 radios > will work with > >the current version? > > > >Thanks, Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of > Jim Duuuude > > > Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 1:49 AM > > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > > > > > > Yes, the RBI-1 is a thing of the past, sorry. > > > > > > I would certainly imagine that the command structure of the > > > FT-897/857/817 > > > has got to > > > be similar to some of their "bigger" radios. > > > > > > Also, in the new release that is about to be released, we > support the > > > Kenwood TM-G707 > > > series (708, 700 etc) radios, and theoretically the D7 HT > > > 144/440 radios > > > using the > > > Quad PCI card. > > > > > > >From: "Gary Young" > > > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > > > > > >To: > > > >Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base? > > > >Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:04:16 -0700 > > > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > > > >bay0-mc8-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > > > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 7 > > > >Oct 2006 00:04:20 -0700 > > > >Received: (qmail 23496 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > > > 07:04:19 -0000 > > > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > > > 0 with SMTP; 7 > > > >Oct 2006 07:04:19 -0000 > > > >Received: (qmail 23487 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2006 > > > 07:04:17 -0000 > > > >Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (204.127.200.85)by 0 > > > with SMTP; 7 Oct > > > >2006 07:04:17 -0000 > > > >Received: from den > > > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > > > >comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTPid > > > <2006100707041601500mc89ge>; Sat, 7 Oct > > > >2006 07:04:16 +0000 > > > >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW40n1awjusdjyqDEZcQleF38hm6CS5pQDGQ= > > > >Return-Path: > > > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > > > >thread-index: Acbp3OCSZMQg7q8gQpWQCvAweoVofw== > > > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > > > >Precedence: list > > > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > >List-Unsubscribe: > > > >, > > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > > > >List-Archive: > > > >List-Post: > > > >List-Help: > > > > >List-Subscribe: > > > >, > > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > > > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2006 07:04:20.0466 (UTC) > > > >FILETIME=[CFC84D20:01C6E9DE] > > > > > > > >Does anyone know where I can get a Doug Hall RBI-1 interface? > > > >They are no longer in production. > > > > > > > >Also is the FT897 the only radio supported with a Quad PCI > > > board, or are > > > >there other radios with the same command structure? > > > > > > > >Thanks, Gary > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >App_rpt mailing list > > > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > App_rpt mailing list > > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >App_rpt mailing list > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sun Oct 8 01:49:48 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:49:48 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Custom ID and CT tones? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <014901c6ea7c$0a268a20$6301a8c0@DEN> How does one change the Id'er frequency and make a custom Courtesy Tone? Changing the settings in rpt.conf doesn't appear to do anything. Gary From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Sun Oct 8 16:03:03 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 09:03:03 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Custom ID and CT tones? In-Reply-To: <014901c6ea7c$0a268a20$6301a8c0@DEN> References: <014901c6ea7c$0a268a20$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: <200610080903.03069.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Gary, See if your version supports "rpt reload" from the asterisk command line. If it does, you can change the unlinked courtesy tone ct1 in rpt.conf then execute rpt reload on the command line, and when you key the radio, the new courtesy tone will be played on unkey. For morse, "rpt reload" does not reload the parameters from the config file. Asterisk must be restarted for morse changes to take place. This appears to be a bug which needs to be fixed in app_rpt.c If the asterisk comand line doesn't understand "rpt reload", this means you are running an older version of app_rpt.c without reload support. Try restaring asterisk after making the changes to rpt.conf. Steve. On Saturday 07 October 2006 18:49, Gary Young wrote: > How does one change the Id'er frequency and make a custom Courtesy Tone? > > Changing the settings in rpt.conf doesn't appear to do anything. > > Gary > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sun Oct 8 17:52:52 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:52:52 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Custom ID and CT tones? In-Reply-To: <200610080903.03069.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Message-ID: <018a01c6eb02$940ade40$6301a8c0@DEN> Thanks, it is working. Restarting asterisk was the answer. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 9:03 AM > To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com; Asterisk Repeater Controler > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Custom ID and CT tones? > > > Gary, > > See if your version supports "rpt reload" from the asterisk > command line. If > it does, you can change the unlinked courtesy tone ct1 in > rpt.conf then > execute rpt reload on the command line, and when you key the radio, > the new courtesy tone will be played on unkey. > > For morse, "rpt reload" does not reload the parameters from > the config file. > Asterisk must be restarted for morse changes to take place. > This appears to > be a bug which needs to be fixed in app_rpt.c > > If the asterisk comand line doesn't understand "rpt reload", > this means you > are running an older version of app_rpt.c without reload > support. Try > restaring asterisk after making the changes to rpt.conf. > > Steve. > > > > On Saturday 07 October 2006 18:49, Gary Young wrote: > > How does one change the Id'er frequency and make a custom > Courtesy Tone? > > > > Changing the settings in rpt.conf doesn't appear to do anything. > > > > Gary > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From eric.fort at gmail.com Mon Oct 9 02:11:10 2006 From: eric.fort at gmail.com (Eric Fort) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:11:10 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. Message-ID: <2ad2af430610081911va4088bdy7217abff1df9176a@mail.gmail.com> Hopefully those on the list can answer a few questions about getting app_rpt setup and what is really required. 1. why is the arib needed and what exactly does it do? 2. Why do I need 2 fxs ports for full duplex operation? my phone is full duplex when plugged into the same port why can't the audio for the radio be? Come to think of it I can buy a little phone with a headset jack for next to nothing and have seperate tx (mike) and rx (speaker) audio. this just takes a 2 to 4 wire hybrid common to most phones. why do I need the arib at all? 3. Why do I need the arib at all? 4. is the rbi-1 really needed? what function does it serve? I've seen mention of using an ft-897 directly without it. How is this done? why hf only for the 897 when the 897 covers hf, 6m, 2m, and 440? 5. what about interfacing other radios used for repeaters such as micor, maxtrack, etc. Thanks, Eric - kg6kqt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Mon Oct 9 05:09:31 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:09:31 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: <2ad2af430610081911va4088bdy7217abff1df9176a@mail.gmail.com> References: <2ad2af430610081911va4088bdy7217abff1df9176a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200610082209.31185.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Eric, See below for the answers. On Sunday 08 October 2006 19:11, Eric Fort wrote: > Hopefully those on the list can answer a few questions about getting > app_rpt setup and what is really required. > > 1. why is the arib needed and what exactly does it do? The main task of the ARIB is to separate the audio from the signaling. FXS connections carry audio (AC) and signalling (DC) on the same twisted pair. The signalling and the audio need to be separated when interfacing to a radio. > > 2. Why do I need 2 fxs ports for full duplex operation? my phone is full > duplex when plugged into the same port why can't the audio for the radio > be? > Come to think of it I can buy a little phone with a headset jack for > next to nothing and have seperate tx (mike) and rx (speaker) audio. this > just takes a 2 to 4 wire hybrid common to most phones. why do I need the > arib at all? > > 3. Why do I need the arib at all? For full-duplex repeater operation 2 FXS ports are an absolute requirement. To see why, keep reading. If you are not running a repeater, onty one FXS port is needed, and a two wire connection can be used. We prefer to set up repeaters instead of half-duplex configurations like Echolink or IRLP. We feel the full duplex repeater configuration gives us more control as we can issue commands while the transmitter is still transmitting, and we don't have to wait for a transmitter to unkey before starting a new transmission. Why the two FXS port requirement for full duplex audio? For full duplex audio (simultaneous receive and transmit) as used with repeaters, no receive audio can be allowed to couple into the transmit audio, without going through audio processing (muting, mixing, etc) first. The hybrid transformers used in phones don't have to be perfect full duplex devices. What I mean by perfect full duplex device, is that no receive audio is discernable in the transmit audio. Phones are not perfect full duplex devices, in fact, some receive audio is purposely introduced in the transmit audio to generate a sidetone. Even the hybrid transformer is still not going to do an acceptable job of rejecting the receive audio on the transmit port, hence the need for a 4-wire connection back to Asterisk using 2FXS ports. > > 4. is the rbi-1 really needed? what function does it serve? I've seen > mention of using an ft-897 directly without it. How is this done? why hf > only for the 897 when the 897 covers hf, 6m, 2m, and 440? The RBI-1 is only required it you want to change the frequency of your radio remotely, and you have the Kenwood mobile radios which are compatible with it. > > 5. what about interfacing other radios used for repeaters such as micor, > maxtrack, etc. We do it all the time. My repeaters are all Motorola Mitrek, or GE Custom MVP. Other guys use Maxtracs, and Desktracs or other synthesized commerial land mobile radios. > > Thanks, > > Eric - kg6kqt From telesistant at hotmail.com Mon Oct 9 06:01:18 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:01:18 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: <2ad2af430610081911va4088bdy7217abff1df9176a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: First of all, analog telephone sets are FAR from full duplex devices (look at one through a sweep generator sometime). A pure 2/4 wire hybrid (a real analog one), even in its best practical (and expensive and heavy with transformers, etc) configuration is WAY far from perfict. Between a telephone set and an FXS interface of todays (poor) quality, the transhybrid loss is not ever expected to be better then 20 db or so, and then only on good days. The bottom line is that being able to do real full duplex (which is ABSOULTELY necessary for a radio system) is just not feasable on a 2 wire interface. So you need a 4 wire one. Most channel banks and other channel termination devices generally only come in FXS and FXO these days (not many 4 wire E&M or SF trunks around anymore), so the idea was to interface to something available and practical. 1 loopstart (for receive) and 1 groundstart (for transmit) FXS interface does the trick really nicely. The ARIB board is there to adjust audio levels and impedances between the 2 FXS interfaces and the receiver and transmitter of repeater RF hardware. Also it takes in typical keying signals (such as COR/PL decode) and outputs PTT to key the transmitter, based upon loop condition of the 2 FXS circuits. A radio system is just not typically able to swallow a telco loop with DC current on it raw. Different radios have different needs for levels, De-emphasis, etc. The ARIB card takes care of all of that for you. The different interface methods (ARIB board, PCI card, etc), are all designed to be a more or less generic interface to 2-way RF hardware. Certainly the Micor, Maxtrac/Radius, Mitrek, etc all are more then capable (and we use all of them ourselves) of being used with any of our interfaces. The Doug Hall RBI-1 is an interface controller (now extinct) that directly interfaces with Kenwood mobile radios, such as the TM-241, TM-331, TM-441, TM-541 (which are also extinct). IT allows the radios to be programmed (their frequency, mode, etc) in real time from a remote-base controller, such as app_rpt. They were a wonderful device in their time. Modernly, we support the Yaesu Radios that have a CAT interface (Which, unfortunately are only the larger mulitband HF-440 radios), such as the FT817/857/897. Also we are just finishing suport for the Kenwood TM-G707 for those that just want a 2m/440 remote for less money. The Yaesu radios are nice (since they cover about everything), but are sometimes not cost effective. And yes, of course, we do support the HF/VHF/UHF on ALL of their bands, including 6m/144/440, even on sideband. Basically our intention is eventually to support all of the affordable radios that have remote control from a PC device possible and accessible. I wish more manufacturers would make this functionality available on the less expensive radios. I hope I have answered all your questions Jim WB6NIL >From: "Eric Fort" >Reply-To: Asterisk Repeater Controler >To: "Asterisk Repeater Controler" >Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. >Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:11:10 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc2-f3.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sun, 8 >Oct 2006 19:12:15 -0700 >Received: (qmail 6029 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 02:11:14 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 9 >Oct 2006 02:11:14 -0000 >Received: (qmail 6019 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 02:11:11 -0000 >Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (66.249.82.227)by 0 with SMTP; 9 Oct >2006 02:11:11 -0000 >Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so1565598wxdfor >; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:11:10 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by 10.90.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr2257616aga;Sun, 08 Oct 2006 >19:11:10 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by 10.90.114.3 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:11:10 -0700 (PDT) >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW40jTUUOq22oCAKzRILYRfEMbhqx9mttO+o= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; >d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;b=QemsegszKRJ9la7q/+NIjS0n+ZtDz4hR3pYjAe2oW2Inlp0M6Xvb1Q3sEzUzuOu9HxNlaTEyhii2xLiLRsXBxEx1L8U10B3VsnlOql4T3Fa/ESrsOL465LQ+DricgEMwrqJSOMDnWL/JW/1r4teBXkRgb8hNe71yOcq8boYiJBw= >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 02:12:15.0538 (UTC) >FILETIME=[56F00120:01C6EB48] > >Hopefully those on the list can answer a few questions about getting >app_rpt >setup and what is really required. > >1. why is the arib needed and what exactly does it do? > >2. Why do I need 2 fxs ports for full duplex operation? my phone is full >duplex when plugged into the same port why can't the audio for the radio >be? Come to think of it I can buy a little phone with a headset jack for >next to nothing and have seperate tx (mike) and rx (speaker) audio. this >just takes a 2 to 4 wire hybrid common to most phones. why do I need the >arib at all? > >3. Why do I need the arib at all? > >4. is the rbi-1 really needed? what function does it serve? I've seen >mention of using an ft-897 directly without it. How is this done? why hf >only for the 897 when the 897 covers hf, 6m, 2m, and 440? > >5. what about interfacing other radios used for repeaters such as micor, >maxtrack, etc. > >Thanks, > >Eric - kg6kqt >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From eric.fort at gmail.com Mon Oct 9 06:06:01 2006 From: eric.fort at gmail.com (Eric Fort) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:06:01 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: <200610082209.31185.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> References: <2ad2af430610081911va4088bdy7217abff1df9176a@mail.gmail.com> <200610082209.31185.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Message-ID: <2ad2af430610082306j5f038f25r653d0e469b2b2780@mail.gmail.com> see below: On 10/8/06, Steve Rodgers wrote: > > Eric, > > See below for the answers. > > > On Sunday 08 October 2006 19:11, Eric Fort wrote: > > Hopefully those on the list can answer a few questions about getting > > app_rpt setup and what is really required. > > > > 1. why is the arib needed and what exactly does it do? > > The main task of the ARIB is to separate the audio from the signaling. > FXS connections carry audio (AC) and signalling (DC) on the same twisted > pair. > The signalling and the audio need to be separated when interfacing to a > radio. > > > > > 2. Why do I need 2 fxs ports for full duplex operation? my phone is > full > > duplex when plugged into the same port why can't the audio for the radio > > be? > > > Come to think of it I can buy a little phone with a headset jack for > > next to nothing and have seperate tx (mike) and rx (speaker) > audio. this > > just takes a 2 to 4 wire hybrid common to most phones. why do I need > the > > arib at all? > > > > 3. Why do I need the arib at all? > > > For full-duplex repeater operation 2 FXS ports are an absolute > requirement. To > see why, keep reading. If you are not running a repeater, onty one FXS > port > is needed, and a two wire connection can be used. > > We prefer to set up repeaters instead of half-duplex configurations like > Echolink or IRLP. We feel the full duplex repeater configuration gives us > more control as we can issue commands while the transmitter is still > transmitting, and we don't have to wait for a transmitter to unkey before > starting a new transmission. agreed, the cactus intertie which I use much of the time is full duplex and it offers many advantages. Why the two FXS port requirement for full duplex audio? For full duplex > audio > (simultaneous receive and transmit) as used with repeaters, no receive > audio > can be allowed to couple into the transmit audio, without going through > audio processing (muting, mixing, etc) first. The hybrid transformers used > in > phones don't have to be perfect full duplex devices. What I mean by > perfect > full duplex device, is that no receive audio is discernable in the > transmit > audio. Phones are not perfect full duplex devices, in fact, some receive > audio is purposely introduced in the transmit audio to generate a > sidetone. > Even the hybrid transformer is still not going to do an acceptable job of > rejecting the receive audio on the transmit port, hence the need for a > 4-wire > connection back to Asterisk using 2FXS ports. thanks for the explaination. too bad there are not 4 wire modules for the DIGIUM cards. what about using an E&M interface/port for radio interfacing (6 wire)? > > > 4. is the rbi-1 really needed? what function does it serve? I've seen > > mention of using an ft-897 directly without it. How is this done? why > hf > > only for the 897 when the 897 covers hf, 6m, 2m, and 440? > > The RBI-1 is only required it you want to change the frequency of your > radio > remotely, and you have the Kenwood mobile radios which are compatible with > it. does app_rpt speak the cat protocol to a serial port? can an ft897 be used in a frequency agile way, just by plugging it in (to the arib board? if not what would it take to impliment this? where can I find docs about how this setup was made to work for the demo. > > > 5. what about interfacing other radios used for repeaters such as > micor, > > maxtrack, etc. > > We do it all the time. My repeaters are all Motorola Mitrek, or GE Custom > MVP. > Other guys use Maxtracs, and Desktracs or other synthesized commerial land > mobile radios. are docs/diagrams available to show how this is done? > Thanks, > > Eric - kg6kqt > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From telesistant at hotmail.com Mon Oct 9 07:07:29 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:07:29 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: <2ad2af430610082306j5f038f25r653d0e469b2b2780@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: As far as the CAT protocol goes, the ARIB board talks to the "Packet Data interface", the 6 pin connector (I believe), which has the Tx and Rx audio, PTT and COR. The CAT protocol goes through one of the serial ports on the PC. On the PCI card, we talk to the serial port (CAT port) directly also, all through 1 8 pin cable, (which forks off to 2 connectors one 6 pin and one 8 pin on the back of the Yaesu radio). Yes we fully support CAT in frequency/mode agile mode along as well as the Doug Hall RBI-1 as well as the Kenwood TM-G707. As far as Digium cards supporting E&M goes, I really think there is VERY little need or desire for such things these days. (Actually the FXS also operates as a DPT like a DID trunk, which technially *is* a 2 wire loop-closure E&M Interface). >From: "Eric Fort" >Reply-To: Asterisk Repeater Controler >To: "Asterisk Repeater Controler" >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. >Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:06:01 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc3-f5.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sun, 8 >Oct 2006 23:06:07 -0700 >Received: (qmail 1314 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 06:06:04 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 9 >Oct 2006 06:06:04 -0000 >Received: (qmail 1304 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 06:06:02 -0000 >Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (66.249.82.226)by 0 with SMTP; 9 Oct >2006 06:06:02 -0000 >Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so1605641wxdfor >; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:06:02 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by 10.90.90.3 with SMTP id n3mr2263657agb;Sun, 08 Oct 2006 >23:06:01 -0700 (PDT) >Received: by 10.90.114.3 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:06:01 -0700 (PDT) >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW42CawCpr6CH+cQyTbKVr/qyYMIhkBTygSg= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; >d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;b=Xn8lzUjJAV4kEdXZa30jYWsE22B4SHK9XD5E+uazeu2Tf4ytM3xuyEn0L4O0bHOqDqZl0kmtN1g39skNK8qLTEvTWFzixQiJxUXh2ulAr0rVzrtUe3ULmMt0EmdccxeHCeTzhD58JVJmkjzTW7bLPOaXrjI1DroXeG874phyMLM= >References: ><2ad2af430610081911va4088bdy7217abff1df9176a at mail.gmail.com><200610082209.31185.hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 06:06:08.0621 (UTC) >FILETIME=[034E89D0:01C6EB69] > >see below: > >On 10/8/06, Steve Rodgers wrote: >> >>Eric, >> >>See below for the answers. >> >> >>On Sunday 08 October 2006 19:11, Eric Fort wrote: >> > Hopefully those on the list can answer a few questions about getting >> > app_rpt setup and what is really required. >> > >> > 1. why is the arib needed and what exactly does it do? >> >>The main task of the ARIB is to separate the audio from the signaling. >>FXS connections carry audio (AC) and signalling (DC) on the same twisted >>pair. >>The signalling and the audio need to be separated when interfacing to a >>radio. >> >> > >> > 2. Why do I need 2 fxs ports for full duplex operation? my phone is >>full >> > duplex when plugged into the same port why can't the audio for the >>radio >> > be? >> >> > Come to think of it I can buy a little phone with a headset jack for >> > next to nothing and have seperate tx (mike) and rx (speaker) >>audio. this >> > just takes a 2 to 4 wire hybrid common to most phones. why do I need >>the >> > arib at all? >> > >> > 3. Why do I need the arib at all? >> >> >>For full-duplex repeater operation 2 FXS ports are an absolute >>requirement. To >>see why, keep reading. If you are not running a repeater, onty one FXS >>port >>is needed, and a two wire connection can be used. >> >>We prefer to set up repeaters instead of half-duplex configurations like >>Echolink or IRLP. We feel the full duplex repeater configuration gives us >>more control as we can issue commands while the transmitter is still >>transmitting, and we don't have to wait for a transmitter to unkey before >>starting a new transmission. > > >agreed, the cactus intertie which I use much of the time is full duplex and >it offers many advantages. > >Why the two FXS port requirement for full duplex audio? For full duplex >>audio >>(simultaneous receive and transmit) as used with repeaters, no receive >>audio >>can be allowed to couple into the transmit audio, without going through >>audio processing (muting, mixing, etc) first. The hybrid transformers used >>in >>phones don't have to be perfect full duplex devices. What I mean by >>perfect >>full duplex device, is that no receive audio is discernable in the >>transmit >>audio. Phones are not perfect full duplex devices, in fact, some receive >>audio is purposely introduced in the transmit audio to generate a >>sidetone. >>Even the hybrid transformer is still not going to do an acceptable job of >>rejecting the receive audio on the transmit port, hence the need for a >>4-wire >>connection back to Asterisk using 2FXS ports. > > >thanks for the explaination. too bad there are not 4 wire modules for the >DIGIUM cards. what about using an E&M interface/port for radio interfacing >(6 wire)? > >> >> > 4. is the rbi-1 really needed? what function does it serve? I've >>seen >> > mention of using an ft-897 directly without it. How is this done? why >>hf >> > only for the 897 when the 897 covers hf, 6m, 2m, and 440? >> >>The RBI-1 is only required it you want to change the frequency of your >>radio >>remotely, and you have the Kenwood mobile radios which are compatible with >>it. > > >does app_rpt speak the cat protocol to a serial port? can an ft897 be used >in a frequency agile way, just by plugging it in (to the arib board? if >not >what would it take to impliment this? where can I find docs about how this >setup was made to work for the demo. > >> >> > 5. what about interfacing other radios used for repeaters such as >>micor, >> > maxtrack, etc. >> >>We do it all the time. My repeaters are all Motorola Mitrek, or GE Custom >>MVP. >>Other guys use Maxtracs, and Desktracs or other synthesized commerial land >>mobile radios. > > > >are docs/diagrams available to show how this is done? > > >> Thanks, >> >> Eric - kg6kqt >>_______________________________________________ >>App_rpt mailing list >>App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >>http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt >> >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 9 16:03:40 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:03:40 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <026701c6ebbc$7f224850$6301a8c0@DEN> Is a 'Quad PCI card' required for Yaseu CAT control of a 787 or can one of the standard PC serial ports be used? Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:07 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. > > As far as the CAT protocol goes, the ARIB board talks to the > "Packet Data > interface", the > 6 pin connector (I believe), which has the Tx and Rx audio, > PTT and COR. The > CAT protocol > goes through one of the serial ports on the PC. On the PCI > card, we talk to > the serial > port (CAT port) directly also, all through 1 8 pin cable, > (which forks off > to 2 connectors > one 6 pin and one 8 pin on the back of the Yaesu radio). > > Yes we fully support CAT in frequency/mode agile mode along > as well as the > Doug Hall RBI-1 as well as the Kenwood TM-G707. > > As far as Digium cards supporting E&M goes, I really think > there is VERY > little need > or desire for such things these days. (Actually the FXS also > operates as a > DPT > like a DID trunk, which technially *is* a 2 wire loop-closure E&M > Interface). > From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 9 16:06:44 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:06:44 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <026801c6ebbc$eaac57a0$6301a8c0@DEN> Is there any support for Digital outputs via the Parallel port or some other device? How are others controlling external I/O devices via Asterisk and app_rpt? Gary From telesistant at hotmail.com Mon Oct 9 16:23:15 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:23:15 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? In-Reply-To: <026801c6ebbc$eaac57a0$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: Excellent question. Before I even considered having app_rpt do such things, people were already being very clever. What people do is use the fact that Asterisk is a multi-functional platform (not just a telephone switch) and use some of the meriad of applications and things available to perform all sorts of tasks. They access and control these things using the autopatch feature of app_rpt. All (well, any that apply which are most) of the dialing plan features avaiable in Asterisk are available to the app_rpt autopatch. Because of this rich inherent ability, I never thought it was necessary to do anyting specifically in app_rpt. People have repeaters doing things I never even imagined repeaters doing. >From: "Gary Young" >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" >Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:06:44 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc4-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 9 >Oct 2006 09:06:50 -0700 >Received: (qmail 3952 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:06:47 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 9 >Oct 2006 16:06:47 -0000 >Received: (qmail 3938 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:06:45 -0000 >Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (63.240.77.82)by 0 with SMTP; 9 Oct >2006 16:06:45 -0000 >Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by >comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTPid <20061009160644012002g97te>; Mon, 9 Oct >2006 16:06:44 +0000 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >thread-index: AcbrcaBOJrGbAuozSGGWc/wmgygNOwASt3Ew >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 16:06:51.0059 (UTC) >FILETIME=[EE462030:01C6EBBC] > >Is there any support for Digital outputs via the Parallel port or some >other >device? > >How are others controlling external I/O devices via Asterisk and app_rpt? > >Gary > >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 9 16:27:38 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:27:38 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <02ad01c6ebbf$d6593810$6301a8c0@DEN> Just thought I would ask before I took the next step which is to investigate this from the phone side of Asterisk. A simple DTMF decoder on a PBX port would certainly work. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:23 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? > > Excellent question. Before I even considered having app_rpt > do such things, > people were already > being very clever. What people do is use the fact that Asterisk is a > multi-functional platform > (not just a telephone switch) and use some of the meriad of > applications and > things available > to perform all sorts of tasks. They access and control these > things using > the autopatch feature > of app_rpt. All (well, any that apply which are most) of the > dialing plan > features avaiable in > Asterisk are available to the app_rpt autopatch. Because of this rich > inherent ability, I never > thought it was necessary to do anyting specifically in > app_rpt. People have > repeaters doing > things I never even imagined repeaters doing. > > > >From: "Gary Young" > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" > >Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? > >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:06:44 -0700 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > >bay0-mc4-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 9 > >Oct 2006 09:06:50 -0700 > >Received: (qmail 3952 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > 16:06:47 -0000 > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > 0 with SMTP; 9 > >Oct 2006 16:06:47 -0000 > >Received: (qmail 3938 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > 16:06:45 -0000 > >Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (63.240.77.82)by 0 with > SMTP; 9 Oct > >2006 16:06:45 -0000 > >Received: from den > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > >comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTPid > <20061009160644012002g97te>; Mon, 9 Oct > >2006 16:06:44 +0000 > >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= > >Return-Path: > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > >thread-index: AcbrcaBOJrGbAuozSGGWc/wmgygNOwASt3Ew > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > >Precedence: list > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > >List-Unsubscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > >List-Archive: > >List-Post: > >List-Help: > >List-Subscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 16:06:51.0059 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[EE462030:01C6EBBC] > > > >Is there any support for Digital outputs via the Parallel > port or some > >other > >device? > > > >How are others controlling external I/O devices via Asterisk > and app_rpt? > > > >Gary > > > >_______________________________________________ > >App_rpt mailing list > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From telesistant at hotmail.com Mon Oct 9 16:29:30 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:29:30 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: <026701c6ebbc$7f224850$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: As I said, with an ARIB board you would use a PC's serial port for CAT. I am not familiar with a '787', but (I believe) according to Yaesu, CAT should be the same on all radios that support it. I just know it works on the 897 and like radios. >From: "Gary Young" >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:03:40 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc9-f8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 9 >Oct 2006 09:03:49 -0700 >Received: (qmail 3395 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:03:47 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 9 >Oct 2006 16:03:47 -0000 >Received: (qmail 3385 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:03:44 -0000 >Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (204.127.200.84)by 0 with SMTP; 9 Oct >2006 16:03:44 -0000 >Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by >comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTPid <2006100916034001400qq9pne>; Mon, 9 Oct >2006 16:03:44 +0000 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >thread-index: AcbrcaBOJrGbAuozSGGWc/wmgygNOwASqXYw >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 16:03:49.0957 (UTC) >FILETIME=[82542750:01C6EBBC] > >Is a 'Quad PCI card' required for Yaseu CAT control of a 787 or can one of >the standard PC serial ports be used? > >Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:07 AM > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. > > > > As far as the CAT protocol goes, the ARIB board talks to the > > "Packet Data > > interface", the > > 6 pin connector (I believe), which has the Tx and Rx audio, > > PTT and COR. The > > CAT protocol > > goes through one of the serial ports on the PC. On the PCI > > card, we talk to > > the serial > > port (CAT port) directly also, all through 1 8 pin cable, > > (which forks off > > to 2 connectors > > one 6 pin and one 8 pin on the back of the Yaesu radio). > > > > Yes we fully support CAT in frequency/mode agile mode along > > as well as the > > Doug Hall RBI-1 as well as the Kenwood TM-G707. > > > > As far as Digium cards supporting E&M goes, I really think > > there is VERY > > little need > > or desire for such things these days. (Actually the FXS also > > operates as a > > DPT > > like a DID trunk, which technially *is* a 2 wire loop-closure E&M > > Interface). > > > >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 9 16:39:01 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:39:01 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base setup? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <02af01c6ebc1$6d267450$6301a8c0@DEN> Are two FXS Ports required for a Remote Base Simplex Operation or can one FXS port be used? Can a Remote base port ever have control capabilities? Gary From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 9 16:42:51 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:42:51 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <02b001c6ebc1$f6d641d0$6301a8c0@DEN> Typo on the radio, I meant 897. Is there a rpt.conf definition for which serial port to use? I didn't see one noted. Sorry for all the question, I am just trying to understand all the capabilities of this system. We have two repeaters working and want to add some remote bases. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:30 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. > > > As I said, with an ARIB board you would use a PC's serial > port for CAT. > > I am not familiar with a '787', but (I believe) according to > Yaesu, CAT > should be the same on all > radios that support it. I just know it works on the 897 and > like radios. > > >From: "Gary Young" > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" > >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. > >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:03:40 -0700 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > >bay0-mc9-f8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 9 > >Oct 2006 09:03:49 -0700 > >Received: (qmail 3395 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > 16:03:47 -0000 > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > 0 with SMTP; 9 > >Oct 2006 16:03:47 -0000 > >Received: (qmail 3385 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > 16:03:44 -0000 > >Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (204.127.200.84)by 0 > with SMTP; 9 Oct > >2006 16:03:44 -0000 > >Received: from den > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > >comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTPid > <2006100916034001400qq9pne>; Mon, 9 Oct > >2006 16:03:44 +0000 > >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= > >Return-Path: > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > >thread-index: AcbrcaBOJrGbAuozSGGWc/wmgygNOwASqXYw > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > >Precedence: list > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > >List-Unsubscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > >List-Archive: > >List-Post: > >List-Help: > >List-Subscribe: > >, pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 16:03:49.0957 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[82542750:01C6EBBC] > > > >Is a 'Quad PCI card' required for Yaseu CAT control of a 787 > or can one of > >the standard PC serial ports be used? > > > >Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of > Jim Duuuude > > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:07 AM > > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] app_rpt setup and requirements. > > > > > > As far as the CAT protocol goes, the ARIB board talks to the > > > "Packet Data > > > interface", the > > > 6 pin connector (I believe), which has the Tx and Rx audio, > > > PTT and COR. The > > > CAT protocol > > > goes through one of the serial ports on the PC. On the PCI > > > card, we talk to > > > the serial > > > port (CAT port) directly also, all through 1 8 pin cable, > > > (which forks off > > > to 2 connectors > > > one 6 pin and one 8 pin on the back of the Yaesu radio). > > > > > > Yes we fully support CAT in frequency/mode agile mode along > > > as well as the > > > Doug Hall RBI-1 as well as the Kenwood TM-G707. > > > > > > As far as Digium cards supporting E&M goes, I really think > > > there is VERY > > > little need > > > or desire for such things these days. (Actually the FXS also > > > operates as a > > > DPT > > > like a DID trunk, which technially *is* a 2 wire loop-closure E&M > > > Interface). > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >App_rpt mailing list > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From eric.fort at gmail.com Mon Oct 9 17:38:35 2006 From: eric.fort at gmail.com (Eric Fort) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:38:35 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? In-Reply-To: <02ad01c6ebbf$d6593810$6301a8c0@DEN> References: <02ad01c6ebbf$d6593810$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: <2ad2af430610091038x58a957a3v7d92ad48b8001c9c@mail.gmail.com> agi under asterisk would be the place to look. This allows asterisk to run external programs similar to the way cgi works with a webserver. These programs can do all sorts of things. look here for info: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+AGI http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+agi eric On 10/9/06, Gary Young wrote: > > Just thought I would ask before I took the next step which is to > investigate > this from the phone side of Asterisk. > > A simple DTMF decoder on a PBX port would certainly work. > > Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:23 AM > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? > > > > Excellent question. Before I even considered having app_rpt > > do such things, > > people were already > > being very clever. What people do is use the fact that Asterisk is a > > multi-functional platform > > (not just a telephone switch) and use some of the meriad of > > applications and > > things available > > to perform all sorts of tasks. They access and control these > > things using > > the autopatch feature > > of app_rpt. All (well, any that apply which are most) of the > > dialing plan > > features avaiable in > > Asterisk are available to the app_rpt autopatch. Because of this rich > > inherent ability, I never > > thought it was necessary to do anyting specifically in > > app_rpt. People have > > repeaters doing > > things I never even imagined repeaters doing. > > > > > > >From: "Gary Young" > > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > > > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" > > >Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? > > >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:06:44 -0700 > > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > > >bay0-mc4-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 9 > > >Oct 2006 09:06:50 -0700 > > >Received: (qmail 3952 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > > 16:06:47 -0000 > > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > > 0 with SMTP; 9 > > >Oct 2006 16:06:47 -0000 > > >Received: (qmail 3938 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > > 16:06:45 -0000 > > >Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (63.240.77.82)by 0 with > > SMTP; 9 Oct > > >2006 16:06:45 -0000 > > >Received: from den > > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > > >comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTPid > > <20061009160644012002g97te>; Mon, 9 Oct > > >2006 16:06:44 +0000 > > >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= > > >Return-Path: > > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > > >thread-index: AcbrcaBOJrGbAuozSGGWc/wmgygNOwASt3Ew > > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > > >Precedence: list > > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > > >List-Unsubscribe: > > >, > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > > >List-Archive: > > >List-Post: > > >List-Help: > > >List-Subscribe: > > >, > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 16:06:51.0059 (UTC) > > >FILETIME=[EE462030:01C6EBBC] > > > > > >Is there any support for Digital outputs via the Parallel > > port or some > > >other > > >device? > > > > > >How are others controlling external I/O devices via Asterisk > > and app_rpt? > > > > > >Gary > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >App_rpt mailing list > > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From apprpt at shaneyoung.com Mon Oct 9 17:46:32 2006 From: apprpt at shaneyoung.com (Shane Young =?iso-8859-1?b?S9hTRVk=?=) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:46:32 -0500 Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? In-Reply-To: <2ad2af430610091038x58a957a3v7d92ad48b8001c9c@mail.gmail.com> References: <02ad01c6ebbf$d6593810$6301a8c0@DEN> <2ad2af430610091038x58a957a3v7d92ad48b8001c9c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1160415992.452a8af876bb9@mail.shaneyoung.com> System works as well for doing things like this: Sally*CLI> show application System Sally*CLI> -= Info about application 'System' =- [Synopsis] Execute a system command [Description] System(command): Executes a command by using system(). If the command fails, the console should report a fallthrough. Result of execution is returned in the SYSTEMSTATUS channel variable: FAILURE Could not execute the specified command SUCCESS Specified command successfully executed Old behaviour: If the command itself executes but is in error, and if there exists a priority n + 101, where 'n' is the priority of the current instance, then the channel will be setup to continue at that priority level. Note that this jump functionality has been deprecated and will only occur if the global priority jumping option is enabled in extensions.conf. Sally*CLI> Quoting Eric Fort : > agi under asterisk would be the place to look. This allows asterisk to run > external programs similar to the way cgi works with a webserver. These > programs can do all sorts of things. > > look here for info: > > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+AGI > > http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+agi > > > eric > > On 10/9/06, Gary Young wrote: > > > > Just thought I would ask before I took the next step which is to > > investigate > > this from the phone side of Asterisk. > > > > A simple DTMF decoder on a PBX port would certainly work. > > > > Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:23 AM > > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? > > > > > > Excellent question. Before I even considered having app_rpt > > > do such things, > > > people were already > > > being very clever. What people do is use the fact that Asterisk is a > > > multi-functional platform > > > (not just a telephone switch) and use some of the meriad of > > > applications and > > > things available > > > to perform all sorts of tasks. They access and control these > > > things using > > > the autopatch feature > > > of app_rpt. All (well, any that apply which are most) of the > > > dialing plan > > > features avaiable in > > > Asterisk are available to the app_rpt autopatch. Because of this rich > > > inherent ability, I never > > > thought it was necessary to do anyting specifically in > > > app_rpt. People have > > > repeaters doing > > > things I never even imagined repeaters doing. > > > > > > > > > >From: "Gary Young" > > > >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > > > > > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" > > > >Subject: [App_rpt] Digital Outputs? > > > >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:06:44 -0700 > > > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by > > > >bay0-mc4-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft > > > SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 9 > > > >Oct 2006 09:06:50 -0700 > > > >Received: (qmail 3952 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > > > 16:06:47 -0000 > > > >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by > > > 0 with SMTP; 9 > > > >Oct 2006 16:06:47 -0000 > > > >Received: (qmail 3938 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 > > > 16:06:45 -0000 > > > >Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (63.240.77.82)by 0 with > > > SMTP; 9 Oct > > > >2006 16:06:45 -0000 > > > >Received: from den > > > (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by > > > >comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTPid > > > <20061009160644012002g97te>; Mon, 9 Oct > > > >2006 16:06:44 +0000 > > > >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= > > > >Return-Path: > > > >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 > > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > > > >thread-index: AcbrcaBOJrGbAuozSGGWc/wmgygNOwASt3Ew > > > >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 > > > >Precedence: list > > > >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler > > > >List-Unsubscribe: > > > >, > > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe> > > > >List-Archive: > > > >List-Post: > > > >List-Help: > > > >List-Subscribe: > > > >, > > pp_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe> > > > >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2006 16:06:51.0059 (UTC) > > > >FILETIME=[EE462030:01C6EBBC] > > > > > > > >Is there any support for Digital outputs via the Parallel > > > port or some > > > >other > > > >device? > > > > > > > >How are others controlling external I/O devices via Asterisk > > > and app_rpt? > > > > > > > >Gary > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >App_rpt mailing list > > > >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > App_rpt mailing list > > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From eric.fort at gmail.com Mon Oct 9 18:17:08 2006 From: eric.fort at gmail.com (Eric Fort) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:17:08 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote Base setup? In-Reply-To: <02af01c6ebc1$6d267450$6301a8c0@DEN> References: <02af01c6ebc1$6d267450$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: <2ad2af430610091117g4d8a03f7hdb3d997b8a537fa8@mail.gmail.com> simplex requires 1 fxs port, full duplex requires 2. Remote control of a remote base may be permitted as could system control through a remote base input. it all depends on how you set things to work. a better description is in the paralell thread with the subject "app_rpt setup and requirements. " eric On 10/9/06, Gary Young wrote: > Are two FXS Ports required for a Remote Base Simplex Operation or can one > FXS port be used? > > Can a Remote base port ever have control capabilities? > > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 9 18:26:19 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:26:19 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Telemetry tones change? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <02bd01c6ebd0$6a88e840$6301a8c0@DEN> Is it true that in order to change the frequencies of the telemetry tones, I have to change them in app_rpt.c then re-make asterisk? Changing the tone frequency definitions in rpt.conf did nothing even after an asterisk restart. Gary From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Tue Oct 10 03:00:13 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:00:13 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Fwd: Re: Telemetry tones change? Message-ID: <200610092000.13091.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Telemetry tones change? Date: Monday 09 October 2006 19:13 From: Steve Rodgers To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com Gary, I just tested this on my system, and it works as advertised I can switch these two statements in rpt.conf: ;remotetx=|t(1633,0,50,3000)(0,0,80,0)(1209,0,50,3000); remotetx=|t(2000,0,50,3000)(0,0,80,0)(1000,0,50,3000); Restarting asterisk or doing "rpt reload" after changing the lines above will cause the remotetx courtesy tone to change. Could you be confused about the function of the remoterx and remotemon courtesy tones defined in the telemetry block? The remotetx courtesy tone is that courtesy tone which is sent when an internet link to a node (remote base or repeater) is connected in trancieve to a remote node on the node you are coming in on from the radio. The remotemon courtesy tone is that courtesy tone which is sent when an internet link to a (remote base or repeater) is connected in monitor to a remote node on the node you are coming in on from the radio. The repeater courtesy tone to play when unlinked (no repeaters or remote linked) is determined by the unlinkedct setting in the node configuration block. This is set to point to ct1 in the default rpt.conf configuration file. It can be set to point to any courtesy tone defined in the telemetry block. Finally, there is one last courtesy tone which is used only for the remote base when it is in tranceive mode and is played following the remotetx courtesy tone when there is a remote base connected to the node you are coming in on AND it is in tranceive mode. This is the remotect setting in the node configuration block. This is set to point to ct3 in the default rpt.conf configuration file. It can be set to point to any courtesy tone defined in the telemetry block. There are no other courtesy tones for the remote base which can be changed in the latest version of app_rpt.c Hope this clears up any confusion. Steve WA6ZFT On Monday 09 October 2006 16:47, Gary Young wrote: > Remotetx is the one I wanted to change. > > The only way I can make a change is to change the tone definitions in > app_rpt.c, then make a new install, then put the same new tone definitions > in the rpt.conf file, and it will work. > > Way to much work... Why are there tone definitions in rpt.conf if they > don't change anything? > > Any other way I tried it gives me NO tones. > > What do you mean by ct1? Can't I select the unlinked ct by using this > statement? > > unlinkedct = ct4 > > > Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com > > [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 11:49 AM > > To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Telemetry tones change? > > > > Gary, > > > > Which tones did you change? CT1, remotetx, and remotemon are > > the only ones relevant at this point. > > > > > From: "Gary Young" > > > Date: 2006/10/09 Mon AM 11:26:19 PDT > > > To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" > > > Subject: [App_rpt] Telemetry tones change? > > > > > > Is it true that in order to change the frequencies of the > > > > telemetry tones, I > > > > > have to change them in app_rpt.c then re-make asterisk? > > > > > > Changing the tone frequency definitions in rpt.conf did > > > > nothing even after > > > > > an asterisk restart. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > App_rpt mailing list > > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt ------------------------------------------------------- From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Wed Oct 11 05:14:04 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:14:04 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Advisory: Changing the courtesy tones Message-ID: <200610102214.04599.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Advisory To change the courtesy tones from defaults it is necessary to have a telemetry=telemetry statement defined in each node configuration block in rpt.conf The default configuration files distributed with asterisk DO NOT have this statement in them. If the statement is left out, the courtesy tone lists in rpt.conf in the telemetry section will never be read in, and the defulat settings in app_rpt.c will always be used. Steve. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: Test results - Found the problem? Date: Tuesday 10 October 2006 20:38 From: "Gary" To: "'Steve Rodgers'" By looking at the code you referenced I discovered the possible need for a 'telemetry = telemetry' statement in the node definition. As soon as I added that line the tones changed from default to the ones defined in the config file. I am going to assume this was the problem and it is supposed to work that way so you can define different telemetry for each node? FYI my sample config did not have that line in it and there is no reference I have found indicating it is required. Thanks for your help. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 7:30 PM > To: Gary > Cc: telesistant at hotmail.com > Subject: Re: Test results > > Gary, > > If you don't mind trying your hand at a little programming > and "foop/feep" > debugging, maybe a few judicious ast_log(LOG_WARNING, > "foop"); statements > might tell what is going on with app_rpt on your system. Save > a copy of the > app_rpt_055_pre.c file first so that you have something to go > back to. > > > Adding an ast_log(LOG_WARNING,"foop"); between line 2301 and > 2302 will tell > you if the [telemetry] block was found in the config file. > > Adding an ast_log(LOG_WARNING,"feep"); between line 2312 and 2313 of > app_rpt_055_pre.c will tell you whether the telemetry entry > in the file is > being loaded or the default value was taken instead. > > The function telem_lookup() is called whenever a telemetry > event is occuring. > You should see both foop and feep on the Asterisk console > every time you unkey > if the entries in the file are being used > > Steve. > > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 18:41, you wrote: > > FYI, I tried it on a third node and it does the same thing. > > I can select any app_rpt.c pre-defined tone set, but cannot > > define a new > > > tone set via rpt.conf. > > > > This is not a big problem as I will just change app_rpt.c > > to the tones I > > > want to use. > > > > Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:55 AM > > > To: Gary > > > Cc: telesistant at hotmail.com > > > Subject: Re: Test results > > > > > > > > > Gary, > > > > > > Please try this version of app_rpt.c and let me know what the > > > results are? > > > This is the version I did the CT test on my system with. > > > Also, could you > > > tell me what version you are running on your system? > > > > > > BTW: I'm also using asterisk 1.2.11 as well. > > > > > > > > > Steve, WA6ZFT > > > > > > On Monday 09 October 2006 22:41, you wrote: > > > > Test results are consistant. > > > > > > > > I have two nodes and they both exhibit the same results. > > > > > > Both built from > > > > > > > the same source files. Could I have bad source? I am using > > > > > > asterisk 1.2.11 > > > > > > > if that matters. > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 10:09 PM > > > > > To: Gary > > > > > Subject: Re: Quad PCI pricing? > > > > > > > > > > Gary, see my responses below: > > > > > > > > > > On Monday 09 October 2006 21:07, you wrote: > > > > > > Can you let me know what the Ham pricing is on the Quad > > > > > > PCI cards? > > > > > > > > The ham discount is 35% from the list price of $895.00 or > > > > > $581.75 plus $20.00 > > > > > shipping and handling. > > > > > > > > > > > Please confirm this board is required for controlling the > > > > > > > > > > Yasue FT897 radio > > > > > > > > > > > and that a PC serial port is not supported? > > > > > > > > > > The currently released app_rpt.c does not support PC serial > > > > > port for FT897 > > > > > control. The "bleeding edge" version as we call it, does > > > > > support sending > > > > > commands to the FT897 over a PC serial port, but it is not > > > > > ready for general > > > > > release as we speak at this moment. > > > > > > > > > > If you don't mind a 'rough' version, wait a few days and it > > > > > will be in a form > > > > > we can give out for testing. > > > > > > > > > > Also, regarding the problems with the CT telemetry: > > > > > > > > > > Would you mind going back to the default config file trying > > > > > it tout, then > > > > > trying to modify a courtesy tone setting to see if that fixes > > > > > your courtesy > > > > > tone issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve. ------------------------------------------------------- From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Fri Oct 13 04:23:25 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:23:25 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote setup help please. In-Reply-To: <1160415992.452a8af876bb9@mail.shaneyoung.com> Message-ID: <048001c6ee7f$541d9540$6301a8c0@DEN> Can some one tell me what the proper config entries are to get a dumb remote working? Should this work? On my system I only can get RX to work from the remote, but no TX out the remote. [1001] rxchannel = Zap/1 functions = functions-remote remote = y [functions-remote] 0=cop,6 ; Phone PTT [nodes] 1001 = radio at remote.remote-address.com/1001,y Thanks, Gary From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Fri Oct 13 04:53:30 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:53:30 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote setup help please. In-Reply-To: <048001c6ee7f$541d9540$6301a8c0@DEN> References: <048001c6ee7f$541d9540$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: <200610122153.30675.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Gary, Here's a half-duplex remote base checklist taken from a prior [app_rpt] mail list thread: 1. The ARIB card needs to have the 4W/2W switch set to 2W (2 wire). 2. Only one cable should be connected from the channelbank to the ARIB card. This should go from the FXS port to J1 on the ARIB card. 3. There should not be a txchannel defined in the nodes section of rpt.conf. 4. Since you are running as a remote base, you must add a 'y' argument to the end of the node definition, like this: 101 = radio at me.asterisk.net/101,y 5. /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf should have em_txrx for signalling on Zap/x. 6. /etc/zaptel.conf should have channel type for Zap/x set to e&m Sample remote configuration for rpt.conf (taken from my setup): [101] rxchannel = Zap/x ; Rx audio/signalling channel remote = ft897 functions = remote-functions phone_functions = remote-functions ; ; Remote base function table ; [remote-functions] 1=remote,2 ; Set freq. 2=remote,3 ; Set tx PL tone 3=remote,4 ; Set rx PL tone 40=remote,100 ; Rx PL off 41=remote,101 ; Rx PL on 42=remote,102 ; Tx PL off 43=remote,103 ; Tx PL on 44=remote,104 ; Low Power 45=remote,105 ; Medium Power 46=remote,106 ; High Power 711=remote,107 ; Bump -20 714=remote,108 ; Bump -100 717=remote,109 ; Bump -500 713=remote,110 ; Bump +20 716=remote,111 ; Bump +100 719=remote,112 ; Bump +500 721=remote,113 ; Scan - slow 724=remote,114 ; Scan - quick 727=remote,115 ; Scan - fast 723=remote,116 ; Scan + slow 726=remote,117 ; Scan + quick 729=remote,118 ; Scan + fast 79=remote,119 ; Tune 51=remote,5 ; Long status query 52=remote,140 ; Short status query 6=remote,6 ; Set mode 8=remote,99 ; User login 9=cop,6 ; Phone ptt [nodes] 101 = radio at me.asterisk.net/101,y Steve On Thursday 12 October 2006 21:23, Gary Young wrote: > Can some one tell me what the proper config entries are to get a dumb > remote working? > > Should this work? On my system I only can get RX to work from the remote, > but no TX out the remote. > > > [1001] > rxchannel = Zap/1 > functions = functions-remote > remote = y > > [functions-remote] > > 0=cop,6 ; Phone PTT > > [nodes] > > 1001 = radio at remote.remote-address.com/1001,y > > > > > > Thanks, Gary > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Fri Oct 13 05:03:46 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:03:46 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Remote setup help please. In-Reply-To: <200610122153.30675.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Message-ID: <049801c6ee84$f72c09b0$6301a8c0@DEN> Thanks! The important items that were missing were the zapata.conf and zaptel.conf settings. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:53 PM > To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com; Asterisk Repeater Controler > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote setup help please. > > > Gary, > > Here's a half-duplex remote base checklist taken from a prior > [app_rpt] mail > list thread: > > > 1. The ARIB card needs to have the 4W/2W switch set to 2W (2 wire). > > 2. Only one cable should be connected from the channelbank to > the ARIB card. > This should go from the FXS port to J1 on the ARIB card. > > 3. There should not be a txchannel defined in the nodes > section of rpt.conf. > > 4. Since you are running as a remote base, you must add a 'y' > argument to the > end of the node definition, like this: 101 = > radio at me.asterisk.net/101,y > > 5. /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf should have em_txrx for > signalling on Zap/x. > > 6. /etc/zaptel.conf should have channel type for Zap/x set to e&m > > Sample remote configuration for rpt.conf (taken from my setup): > > [101] > > rxchannel = Zap/x ; Rx audio/signalling channel > remote = ft897 > functions = remote-functions > phone_functions = remote-functions > > ; > ; Remote base function table > ; > > [remote-functions] > 1=remote,2 ; Set freq. > 2=remote,3 ; Set tx PL tone > 3=remote,4 ; Set rx PL tone > 40=remote,100 ; Rx PL off > 41=remote,101 ; Rx PL on > 42=remote,102 ; Tx PL off > 43=remote,103 ; Tx PL on > 44=remote,104 ; Low Power > 45=remote,105 ; Medium Power > 46=remote,106 ; High Power > 711=remote,107 ; Bump -20 > 714=remote,108 ; Bump -100 > 717=remote,109 ; Bump -500 > 713=remote,110 ; Bump +20 > 716=remote,111 ; Bump +100 > 719=remote,112 ; Bump +500 > 721=remote,113 ; Scan - slow > 724=remote,114 ; Scan - quick > 727=remote,115 ; Scan - fast > 723=remote,116 ; Scan + slow > 726=remote,117 ; Scan + quick > 729=remote,118 ; Scan + fast > 79=remote,119 ; Tune > 51=remote,5 ; Long status query > 52=remote,140 ; Short status query > 6=remote,6 ; Set mode > 8=remote,99 ; User login > 9=cop,6 ; Phone ptt > > [nodes] > > 101 = radio at me.asterisk.net/101,y > > > Steve > > > On Thursday 12 October 2006 21:23, Gary Young wrote: > > Can some one tell me what the proper config entries are to > get a dumb > > remote working? > > > > Should this work? On my system I only can get RX to work > from the remote, > > but no TX out the remote. > > > > > > [1001] > > rxchannel = Zap/1 > > functions = functions-remote > > remote = y > > > > [functions-remote] > > > > 0=cop,6 ; Phone PTT > > > > [nodes] > > > > 1001 = radio at remote.remote-address.com/1001,y > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Gary > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From w4wwm at knology.net Sat Oct 21 07:22:58 2006 From: w4wwm at knology.net (Will) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:22:58 -0500 Subject: [App_rpt] Setup the iaxrpt soft radio base station Message-ID: <4539CAD2.3000502@knology.net> Steve, In the iaxRPT account setup for connection to my app_rpt node, 2059, step ( 4) is in question. Could you tell me where or what parameter in the iax.conf will the password be set? Or how to set it? I don't think a password was set in the config script. In the Accounts dialog box, Add a new account and then: 1. Set the Account Name field to the node number you wish to connect to. 2. Set the Host field to the host IP address or FQDN you wish to connect to. 3. Set the Username field to gui ***4. Set the Password and Confirm fields to the password you set in iax.conf. From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Sat Oct 21 09:41:59 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 2:41:59 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Setup the iaxrpt soft radio base station Message-ID: <20061021094200.KWOV11034.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Will, You need to add a stanza in iax.conf and context in extensions.conf to allow iaxrpt connections in. Here's what I use (password changed to protect the innocent)-- iax.conf: ; Gui users [gui] type=user context=radio-gui auth=md5 secret=yoursecret host=dynamic disallow=all allow=gsm notransfer=yes extensions.conf: [radio-gui] exten => 2010,1,rpt(2010|X) Steve. > > From: Will > Date: 2006/10/21 Sat AM 12:22:58 PDT > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: [App_rpt] Setup the iaxrpt soft radio base station > > Steve, > > In the iaxRPT account setup for connection to my app_rpt node, 2059, > step ( 4) is in question. Could you tell me where or what parameter in > the iax.conf will the password be set? Or how to set it? I don't think > a password was set in the config script. > > > In the Accounts dialog box, Add a new account and then: > 1. Set the Account Name field to the node number you wish to connect to. > 2. Set the Host field to the host IP address or FQDN you wish to connect > to. > 3. Set the Username field to gui > ***4. Set the Password and Confirm fields to the password you set in > iax.conf. > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From w4wwm at knology.net Sat Oct 21 20:16:33 2006 From: w4wwm at knology.net (Will Wright) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:16:33 -0500 Subject: [App_rpt] Setup the iaxrpt software radio base station Message-ID: <1161461794.6271.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Steve, Yes sir, I followed the instructions to the tee and have set up the stanza in both the extensions and the iax.conf script plus ran extensions reload. Here's the CLI> No registration for peer 'gui' (from 192.168.1.100) CLI> Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.1.100, who was trying to reach '2059@'. On my LAN I have the app_rpt box at 192.168.103 and the running win2000 on 192.168.1.100. According to the first messages is that I'm not registered. But I have place all the required information in the iaxrpt software. ie account = 2059, users = gui, host = 192.168.1.103 and the password and confirmed password. I wonder is the gui holding the information? From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Sun Oct 22 21:58:52 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:58:52 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Setup the iaxrpt software radio base station In-Reply-To: <1161461794.6271.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1161461794.6271.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <200610221458.52473.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Will, Reload extensions will not work, as you need to have Asterisk reload iax.conf as well. In other words, you need to restart Asterisk. Your setup is identical to mine. I just rechecked my system to see if I could connect with iaxrpt, and it connects just fine. Steve. On Saturday 21 October 2006 13:16, Will Wright wrote: > Steve, > > Yes sir, > > I followed the instructions to the tee and have set up the stanza in > both the extensions and the iax.conf script plus ran extensions reload. > > Here's the CLI> No registration for peer 'gui' (from 192.168.1.100) > CLI> Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.1.100, who was trying to > reach '2059@'. > > On my LAN I have the app_rpt box at 192.168.103 and the running win2000 > on 192.168.1.100. > > According to the first messages is that I'm not registered. But I have > place all the required information in the iaxrpt software. ie account = > 2059, users = gui, host = 192.168.1.103 and the password and confirmed > password. I wonder is the gui holding the information? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From w4wwm at knology.net Tue Oct 24 01:44:04 2006 From: w4wwm at knology.net (Will) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:44:04 -0500 Subject: [App_rpt] Setup the iaxrpt soft radio base station Message-ID: <453D6FE4.9060004@knology.net> Thanks Steve, it's all working now. I can now key the transmitter with iaxrpt. Thanks again. By the way, I am working to bring the new controller on line. It has three full duplex ports. Anyway take care. 73 Will / W4WWM From gary at tcomeng.com Fri Oct 27 01:55:45 2006 From: gary at tcomeng.com (Gary) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:55:45 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000c01c6f96b$047f3420$6301a8c0@DEN> Is there a way to open up a Link Port or Remote Base port to pass DTMF Audio? Gary From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Sat Oct 28 03:15:21 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:15:21 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <000c01c6f96b$047f3420$6301a8c0@DEN> References: <000c01c6f96b$047f3420$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: <200610272015.21967.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Gary, We have some functionality for this when operating a node as a bridge to a legacy RF-linked system. (We do this on the Calnet node) There are settings to faclitate this in rpt.conf: propagate_dtmf linktolink notelemtx inxlat outxlat They're not documented in the rpt. conf file yet, so you'll have to look at the app_rpt.c source file to figure out how to use them. The problem comes when you want to pass * and #. Since these mean something to the app_rpt command decoder, they need to be escaped with a 2 digit sequence. When you enable command passthrough on a node acting as a bridge, * traditionally becomes *7, and # becomes *0. This is true for all app_rpt commands directed at that node as well. This is what the inxlat and outxlat are used for. Steve On Thursday 26 October 2006 18:55, Gary wrote: > Is there a way to open up a Link Port or Remote Base port to pass DTMF > Audio? > > Gary > > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From telesistant at hotmail.com Sat Oct 28 04:47:48 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:47:48 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <200610272015.21967.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Message-ID: also, lets not forget about duplex=0 >From: Steve Rodgers >To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com, Asterisk Repeater Controler > >CC: telesistant at hotmail.com >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? >Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:15:21 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from sv.qrvc.com ([68.15.19.112]) by >bay0-mc10-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Fri, >27 Oct 2006 20:15:52 -0700 >Received: from steverod.sv.qrvc.com (steverod.sv.qrvc.com >[192.168.17.10])by sv.qrvc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1DC4204BD;Fri, 27 >Oct 2006 20:15:22 -0700 (PDT) >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2kboKMuduNa7Os9cSSI6xecS6toF5roo4= >User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 >References: <000c01c6f96b$047f3420$6301a8c0 at DEN> >Return-Path: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2006 03:15:53.0089 (UTC) >FILETIME=[60394F10:01C6FA3F] > > >Gary, > >We have some functionality for this when operating a node as a bridge to a >legacy RF-linked system. (We do this on the Calnet node) > >There are settings to faclitate this in rpt.conf: > >propagate_dtmf >linktolink >notelemtx >inxlat >outxlat > >They're not documented in the rpt. conf file yet, so you'll have to look at >the app_rpt.c source file to figure out how to use them. > >The problem comes when you want to pass * and #. Since these mean something >to >the app_rpt command decoder, they need to be escaped with a 2 digit >sequence. >When you enable command passthrough on a node acting as a bridge, * >traditionally becomes *7, and # becomes *0. This is true for all app_rpt >commands directed at that node as well. This is what the inxlat and >outxlat >are used for. > > >Steve > > > >On Thursday 26 October 2006 18:55, Gary wrote: > > Is there a way to open up a Link Port or Remote Base port to pass DTMF > > Audio? > > > > Gary > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From telesistant at hotmail.com Sat Oct 28 04:49:06 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:49:06 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <200610272015.21967.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Message-ID: or is it duplex=1?? I dont remember, its definitely one of the two >From: Steve Rodgers >To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com, Asterisk Repeater Controler > >CC: telesistant at hotmail.com >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? >Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:15:21 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from sv.qrvc.com ([68.15.19.112]) by >bay0-mc10-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Fri, >27 Oct 2006 20:15:52 -0700 >Received: from steverod.sv.qrvc.com (steverod.sv.qrvc.com >[192.168.17.10])by sv.qrvc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1DC4204BD;Fri, 27 >Oct 2006 20:15:22 -0700 (PDT) >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2kboKMuduNa7Os9cSSI6xecS6toF5roo4= >User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 >References: <000c01c6f96b$047f3420$6301a8c0 at DEN> >Return-Path: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2006 03:15:53.0089 (UTC) >FILETIME=[60394F10:01C6FA3F] > > >Gary, > >We have some functionality for this when operating a node as a bridge to a >legacy RF-linked system. (We do this on the Calnet node) > >There are settings to faclitate this in rpt.conf: > >propagate_dtmf >linktolink >notelemtx >inxlat >outxlat > >They're not documented in the rpt. conf file yet, so you'll have to look at >the app_rpt.c source file to figure out how to use them. > >The problem comes when you want to pass * and #. Since these mean something >to >the app_rpt command decoder, they need to be escaped with a 2 digit >sequence. >When you enable command passthrough on a node acting as a bridge, * >traditionally becomes *7, and # becomes *0. This is true for all app_rpt >commands directed at that node as well. This is what the inxlat and >outxlat >are used for. > > >Steve > > > >On Thursday 26 October 2006 18:55, Gary wrote: > > Is there a way to open up a Link Port or Remote Base port to pass DTMF > > Audio? > > > > Gary > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 28 16:56:03 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:56:03 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <200610272015.21967.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Message-ID: <00b601c6fab1$f457ada0$6301a8c0@DEN> With these settings I get a very short burst of the dtmf propagated, very short. Is there a way to make the dtmf burst longer in duration? The inxlat and outxlat do not seem to do anything with these settings. propagate_dtmf = yes linktolink = yes inxlat = 7 outxlat = 0 Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:15 PM > To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com; Asterisk Repeater Controler > Cc: telesistant at hotmail.com > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > > Gary, > > We have some functionality for this when operating a node as > a bridge to a > legacy RF-linked system. (We do this on the Calnet node) > > There are settings to faclitate this in rpt.conf: > > propagate_dtmf > linktolink > notelemtx > inxlat > outxlat > > They're not documented in the rpt. conf file yet, so you'll > have to look at > the app_rpt.c source file to figure out how to use them. > > The problem comes when you want to pass * and #. Since these > mean something to > the app_rpt command decoder, they need to be escaped with a 2 > digit sequence. > When you enable command passthrough on a node acting as a bridge, * > traditionally becomes *7, and # becomes *0. This is true for > all app_rpt > commands directed at that node as well. This is what the > inxlat and outxlat > are used for. > > > Steve > > > > On Thursday 26 October 2006 18:55, Gary wrote: > > Is there a way to open up a Link Port or Remote Base port > to pass DTMF > > Audio? > > > > Gary > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > App_rpt mailing list > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > From telesistant at hotmail.com Sat Oct 28 18:17:06 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:17:06 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <00b601c6fab1$f457ada0$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: The Zaptel driver's tone output is normally 100ms (which can be changed with and IOCTL). Is that not long enough?? >From: "Gary Young" >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > >To: "'Steve Rodgers'" ,"'Asterisk Repeater >Controler'" >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? >Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:56:03 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc4-f4.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 28 >Oct 2006 09:57:08 -0700 >Received: (qmail 31727 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2006 16:56:07 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 28 >Oct 2006 16:56:07 -0000 >Received: (qmail 31712 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2006 16:56:04 -0000 >Received: from alnrmhc12.comcast.net (204.127.225.92)by 0 with SMTP; 28 Oct >2006 16:56:04 -0000 >Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by >comcast.net (alnrmhc12) with SMTPid <20061028165603b12007ib68e>; Sat, 28 >Oct 2006 16:56:03 +0000 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3Lj5cLakrD8U30Q+AeLB9OnCuEcZrYQrw= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >thread-index: Acb6P1VxpeZRlKR9SPq0nM+LlsqzAgAcjKjA >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2006 16:57:08.0638 (UTC) >FILETIME=[1ABD63E0:01C6FAB2] > >With these settings I get a very short burst of the dtmf propagated, very >short. >Is there a way to make the dtmf burst longer in duration? >The inxlat and outxlat do not seem to do anything with these settings. > >propagate_dtmf = yes >linktolink = yes >inxlat = 7 >outxlat = 0 > >Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:15 PM > > To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com; Asterisk Repeater Controler > > Cc: telesistant at hotmail.com > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > > > > > Gary, > > > > We have some functionality for this when operating a node as > > a bridge to a > > legacy RF-linked system. (We do this on the Calnet node) > > > > There are settings to faclitate this in rpt.conf: > > > > propagate_dtmf > > linktolink > > notelemtx > > inxlat > > outxlat > > > > They're not documented in the rpt. conf file yet, so you'll > > have to look at > > the app_rpt.c source file to figure out how to use them. > > > > The problem comes when you want to pass * and #. Since these > > mean something to > > the app_rpt command decoder, they need to be escaped with a 2 > > digit sequence. > > When you enable command passthrough on a node acting as a bridge, * > > traditionally becomes *7, and # becomes *0. This is true for > > all app_rpt > > commands directed at that node as well. This is what the > > inxlat and outxlat > > are used for. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > On Thursday 26 October 2006 18:55, Gary wrote: > > > Is there a way to open up a Link Port or Remote Base port > > to pass DTMF > > > Audio? > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > App_rpt mailing list > > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt > > > >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 28 18:29:23 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:29:23 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00d501c6fabe$fdfd1630$6301a8c0@DEN> That would be fine if I were getting 100ms. I seem to be getting 30ms or less of tone. Gary > > The Zaptel driver's tone output is normally 100ms (which can > be changed with > and IOCTL). Is that not long enough?? > > From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 28 18:51:10 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:51:10 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00d601c6fac2$094d0600$6301a8c0@DEN> Could someone tell me how to check the zaptel dtmf setting? Sorry, I am Zaptel challenged... Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 11:17 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net; hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > The Zaptel driver's tone output is normally 100ms (which can > be changed with > and IOCTL). Is that not long enough?? > > > From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sat Oct 28 19:11:35 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:11:35 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00d701c6fac4$e3371610$6301a8c0@DEN> Found the Zaptel digits.h file dtmf tone length to be set to 100ms so that must not be the problem. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 11:17 AM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net; hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > The Zaptel driver's tone output is normally 100ms (which can > be changed with > and IOCTL). Is that not long enough?? > > From telesistant at hotmail.com Sat Oct 28 20:47:24 2006 From: telesistant at hotmail.com (Jim Duuuude) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:47:24 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <00d701c6fac4$e3371610$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: On my test node (102), I set the following: duplex = 0 ; No duplex, no response (mostly) propagate_dtmf = yes ; Propigate non-function DTMF digits linktolink = yes On my normal node (2001), I hit *3102 to bring up a full duplex link to node 102. I then go into command mode for node 102, by entering *40 (since 102 was the last addressed node). Then, whatever touchtones I hit, like 123 comes out the transmitter of node 102 just like it should. >From: "Gary Young" >Reply-To: pcfrover at tcomeng.com,Asterisk Repeater Controler > >To: "'Asterisk Repeater Controler'" >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? >Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:11:35 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists.illiana.net ([207.227.243.140]) by >bay0-mc4-f19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, >28 Oct 2006 12:12:38 -0700 >Received: (qmail 28399 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2006 19:11:37 -0000 >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 28 >Oct 2006 19:11:37 -0000 >Received: (qmail 28387 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2006 19:11:36 -0000 >Received: from alnrmhc12.comcast.net (206.18.177.52)by 0 with SMTP; 28 Oct >2006 19:11:36 -0000 >Received: from den (c-69-181-173-31.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[69.181.173.31])by >comcast.net (alnrmhc12) with SMTPid <20061028191135b12007hns2e>; Sat, 28 >Oct 2006 19:11:35 +0000 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKtU9j2Z7TuGo= >Return-Path: >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >thread-index: Acb6vVPmA47hJOATQ5K4sP7lk5B59QAB15HQ >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2006 19:12:38.0912 (UTC) >FILETIME=[08C2C000:01C6FAC5] > >Found the Zaptel digits.h file dtmf tone length to be set to 100ms so that >must not be the problem. > >Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 11:17 AM > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net; hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > > > The Zaptel driver's tone output is normally 100ms (which can > > be changed with > > and IOCTL). Is that not long enough?? > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >App_rpt mailing list >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sun Oct 29 01:57:30 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:57:30 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00ea01c6fafd$9816f8b0$6301a8c0@DEN> Thanks for the info. Confirm you must go into command mode to generate the DTMF? I was not using command mode (I don't really understand what it command mode is) so that could be the problem. My config is the same as yours so hopefully it is the lack of 'command mode' that was the problem. I'll try it and see what happens. Tell me more about using the '0' feature instead of a node number. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 1:47 PM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > On my test node (102), I set the following: > > duplex = 0 ; No duplex, no > response (mostly) > propagate_dtmf = yes ; Propigate > non-function DTMF digits > linktolink = yes > > On my normal node (2001), I hit *3102 to bring up a full > duplex link to > node 102. I then go into command mode for node 102, by > entering *40 (since 102 was the last addressed node). Then, > whatever touchtones I hit, like 123 comes out the transmitter > of node 102 just like it should. > > > From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Sun Oct 29 02:04:53 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:04:53 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00ec01c6fafe$a6593860$6301a8c0@DEN> Good news, it works! Thanks for the help and it appears there are a lot of hidden 'features' I need to learn about... Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 1:47 PM > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > On my test node (102), I set the following: > > duplex = 0 ; No duplex, no > response (mostly) > propagate_dtmf = yes ; Propigate > non-function DTMF digits > linktolink = yes > > On my normal node (2001), I hit *3102 to bring up a full > duplex link to > node 102. I then go into command mode for node 102, by > entering *40 (since 102 was the last addressed node). Then, > whatever touchtones I hit, like 123 comes out the transmitter > of node 102 just like it should. > > From hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com Sun Oct 29 03:01:51 2006 From: hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com (Steve Rodgers) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:01:51 -0700 Subject: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? In-Reply-To: <00ea01c6fafd$9816f8b0$6301a8c0@DEN> References: <00ea01c6fafd$9816f8b0$6301a8c0@DEN> Message-ID: <200610282001.51398.hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Gary, See below-- On Saturday 28 October 2006 18:57, Gary Young wrote: > Thanks for the info. Confirm you must go into command mode to generate the > DTMF? Yep. > I was not using command mode (I don't really understand what it command > mode is) so that could be the problem. The purpose of Command Mode makes is to make your local node command decoder ignore any DTMF, and instead forward it over the link to the far end where it gets decoded. When you are in commend mode, you should hear an extra beep in the courtesy tone sequence on the node you are accessing. You must remember to exit Command Mode when you are finished commanding the local node. If you do not, no audio will passed in command mode. > My config is the same as yours so hopefully it is the lack of 'command > mode' that was the problem. I'll try it and see what happens. > > Tell me more about using the '0' feature instead of a node number. 0 is shorthand for the last valid node number entered. If you connect to node 1234 using *31234, you can go in to command mode on node 1234 by dialing *40, or disconnect from node 1234 by dialing *10. > > Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Jim Duuuude > > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 1:47 PM > > To: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net > > Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Passing DTMF? > > > > On my test node (102), I set the following: > > > > duplex = 0 ; No duplex, no > > response (mostly) > > propagate_dtmf = yes ; Propigate > > non-function DTMF digits > > linktolink = yes > > > > On my normal node (2001), I hit *3102 to bring up a full > > duplex link to > > node 102. I then go into command mode for node 102, by > > entering *40 (since 102 was the last addressed node). Then, > > whatever touchtones I hit, like 123 comes out the transmitter > > of node 102 just like it should. > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt From f6hqz-m at hamwlan.net Sun Oct 29 09:55:24 2006 From: f6hqz-m at hamwlan.net (f6hqz-m at hamwlan.net) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:55:24 +0100 Subject: [App_rpt] Simplex radio interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hello friends, For those who want to build a very simple interface for a simplex radio behind a single FXS Asterisk interface as a Digium TDM400P or TDM2400P : http://www.hamwlan.net/images/FXS-SIMPLEX-RADIO-V2.jpg Have fun ! 73, F6HQZ, Francois BERGERET, France. From pcfrover at tcomeng.com Mon Oct 30 08:02:33 2006 From: pcfrover at tcomeng.com (Gary Young) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:02:33 -0800 Subject: [App_rpt] Simplex radio interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <014e01c6fbf9$c1d3a7a0$6301a8c0@DEN> Very nice, Thanks! Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net > [mailto:app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net] On Behalf Of > f6hqz-m at hamwlan.net > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:55 AM > To: 'Asterisk Repeater Controler' > Subject: [App_rpt] Simplex radio interface > > Hello friends, > > For those who want to build a very simple interface for a > simplex radio > behind a single FXS Asterisk interface as a Digium TDM400P or > TDM2400P : > http://www.hamwlan.net/images/FXS-SIMPLEX-RADIO-V2.jpg > > Have fun ! > > 73, > F6HQZ, > Francois BERGERET, > France. > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt mailing list > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt >