[App_rpt] Remote Base

Brian Webster bwebster at wirelessmapping.com
Mon Mar 12 16:30:00 UTC 2007


Can we make an IAXY ata device work then? that works using IAX not SIP.



Thank You,
Brian N2KGC

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rodgers [mailto:hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:53 AM
To: Asterisk Repeater Controler
Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base


IAX2 already has radio support built-in with KEY and UNKEY messages in
the control frames. This is how we link to other systems in app_rpt. IAX
ATA's would have to be modified handle these control frames with a
special configuration setting. For receive, the ATA would have to send a
KEY message every time the loop is closed, and an UNKEY message every
time the loop is opened. For transmit, the ATA would have to apply
battery when the KEY message is received, and remove battery when the
UNKEY message is received. Also for transmit, there needs to be a
watchdog function to kill the TX if the connection is lost or degraded.


Steve.

> In my looking at this issue I noted that iax2 is headed for ietf
> standardization and is currently in draft.  me thinks that a few choice
> commands placed in the iax2 protocol to do this in call signalling would
be
> quite nice.  (I may ask a friend of mine who works at digium about
> that)  If
> IAX2 had the commands to do polarity reversal in call what would it take
to
> have app_rpt control it?
>
> Eric
>
> On 3/11/07, Jim Duuuude <telesistant at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No SIP ATA's even come CLOSE to supporting what we need.
>>
>> What they call battery reversal is an indication that the call has
>> answered
>> on the far end
>> which may happen ONLY once per call (if it un-answers on the far end it
>> terminates the
>> call).
>>
>> Our needs are to have a SIP call initiated and for it to say up (rather
>> permanently or so)
>> and to have the ability to send on-hook/off-hook states many times as
>> needed. No
>> one does this or even has a concept of this.
>>
>>
>> >From: Stephen Rodgers <hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com>
>> >Reply-To: Asterisk Repeater Controler <app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>> >To: Asterisk Repeater Controler <app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>> >Subject: Re: [App_rpt] Remote Base
>> >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:58:52 -0700
>> >MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >Received: from marauder.illiana.net ([64.212.212.35]) by
>> >bay0-mc7-f20.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668);
>> Sun,
>> >11 Mar 2007 13:58:35 -0700
>> >Received: (qmail 26925 invoked by uid 1484); 11 Mar 2007 20:58:34 -0000
>> >Received: from 127.0.0.1 by marauder (envelope-from
>> ><app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net>, uid 71) with qmail-scanner-2.01
>> >(clamdscan: 0.84/2481.   Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.  Processed in 0.039165
>> >secs); 11 Mar 2007 20:58:34 -0000
>> >Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1)  by 0 with SMTP;
>> 11
>> >Mar 2007 20:58:34 -0000
>> >Received: (qmail 26806 invoked by uid 1484); 11 Mar 2007 20:58:28 -0000
>> >Received: from 68.15.19.112 by marauder
>> >(envelope-from<hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com>, uid 71) with
>> >qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.84/2481.  Clear:RC:0(68.15.19.112):.
>> >Processed in 0.288186 secs); 11 Mar 2007 20:58:28 -0000
>> >Received: from wsip-68-15-19-112.sd.sd.cox.net (HELO
>> >sv.qrvc.com)(68.15.19.112) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2007 20:58:26 -0000
>> >Received: from [192.168.17.10] (steverod.sv.qrvc.com [192.168.17.10])by
>> >sv.qrvc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EAB4207F5for
>> ><app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:58:23 -0800 (PST)
>> >X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW42qcnmnBI8UHq9RUd57UmnYrrjh70Y4AzY=
>> >Return-Path: <hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com>
>> >Delivered-To: mailman-app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> >User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103)
>> >References:
>> ><da99ac960702270929j376a4da6mbbb88e4687313b98 at mail.gmail.com>  <
>> 45E4B697.6060900 at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com><
>> 2ad2af430703111219p3940b2d2pdff030f1667cb31d at mail.gmail.com>
>> >X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
>> >X-BeenThere: app_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
>> >Precedence: list
>> >List-Id: Asterisk Repeater Controler <app_rpt.lists.illiana.net>
>> >List-Unsubscribe:
>> ><http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt>,<mailto:
>> app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >List-Archive: <http://lists.illiana.net/pipermail/app_rpt>
>> >List-Post: <mailto:app_rpt at lists.illiana.net>
>> >List-Help: <mailto:app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=help>
>> >List-Subscribe:
>> ><http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt>,<mailto:
>> app_rpt-request at lists.illiana.net?subject=subscribe>
>> >Errors-To: app_rpt-bounces at lists.illiana.net
>> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2007 20:58:35.0306 (UTC)
>> >FILETIME=[08D200A0:01C76420]
>> >
>> >
>> >Eric,
>> >
>> >You can research this further, but I'm not convinced SIP ATA's give a
>> >fine enough level of control for polarity reversal, or battery
>> >interruption.
>> >
>> >What would be required are special SIP commands which tell the far end
>> >Asterisk server when a phone goes off hook (for RX), and special SIP
>> >commands for applying and removing battery for the TX loop.
>> >
>> >For RX, SIP ATA's do not work like this. When a user goes off hook, a
>> >LOCAL dialtone is generated in the ATA, and only when the digits are
>> >dialed which match a route programmed into the ATA, does the ATA make
>> >connection with the Asterisk server. For TX, SIP ATA's provide battery
>> >all of the time and cannot be set up to interrupt battery on an ad-hoc
>> >basis.
>> >
>> >
>> >Even if all of the above were eventually sfound to be supported, App_rpt
>> >wuld have to undergo a significant rewrite to support SIP on the
>> >repeater port. A lot of things in app_rpt depend on the support Zaptel
>> >provides.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Eric Fort wrote:
>> > > Steve, Yes I read your reply below...then I googled and composed this
>> > > query.  Why will it not work?  how can it work?
>> > >
>> > > (Worst case a patch to asterisk may come to mind since we are running
>> > > seperate channels for tx/rx anyway)
>> > >
>> > > All of the ata's below (the majority of the market) would appear to
>> >support
>> > > polarity reversal  now how can that feature be used with an arib
>> board
>> >to
>> > > place a remote node at the end of an ethernet cable across the
>> network
>> > > (where the controlling asterisk box is say on another continent)?
>> > >
>> > > cisco ata186 and ata188
>> > >
>> >
>>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps514/products_administratio
n_guide_chapter09186a0080160f73.html#1021012
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > SIPURA SPA-3000
>> > > http://www.sipura.com/Documents/SipuraSPAUserGuidev2.0.9.pdf
>> > > also SPA-2000, SPA-2100, SPA-1001
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ustarcom
>> > > http://www.utstar.com/Document_Library/0043.pdf
>> > >
>> > > HandyTone 286
>> > > http://www.grandstream.com/user_manuals/HandyTone.pdf
>> > >
>> > > Grandstream Handytone ATA-496
>> > > http://www.grandstream.com/user_manuals/HT-496.pdf
>> > >
>> > > Grandstream Handytone ATA-386
>> > > http://www.grandstream.com/user_manuals/HandyTone-386UserManual.pdf
>> > >
>> > > Grandstream Handytone ATA-488
>> > > http://www.grandstream.com/user_manuals/HT488UserManual.pdf
>> > >
>> > > Grandstream Handytone ATA-486
>> > > http://www.grandstream.com/user_manuals/HandyTone-486UserManual.pdf
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Eric
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2/27/07, Stephen Rodgers < hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> ATA's don't support the line signalling methods required by the ARIB
>> to
>> > >> indicate PTT and/or COR presence.
>> > >>
>> > >> Steve.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> David Craig wrote:
>> > >> > Can App_rpt be used with an ATA for a simplex or half duplex
>> remote
>> > >> base.
>> > >> > The example might be an Grandstream HandyTone 286 with the FXS
>> port
>> > >> > connected ARIB.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I have a situation where I need a very small radio interface
>> and my
>> > >> > asterisk
>> > >> > box will be remote via a high speed connection.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks for any help.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > David
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> >
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > App_rpt mailing list
>> > >> > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> > >> > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> App_rpt mailing list
>> > >> App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> > >> http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > App_rpt mailing list
>> > > App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> > > http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >App_rpt mailing list
>> >App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> >http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt mailing list
>> App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
>> http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt mailing list
> App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
> http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt

_______________________________________________
App_rpt mailing list
App_rpt at lists.illiana.net
http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt





More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list