[App_rpt-users] one-way key-up delay

[Ken]

I restarted one of those nodes in the way you suggested and it seems to have
fixed the delay (at the moment)

 

The restart spit out a LOT of messages - I will send you the list
separately.

 

Ken

 

 

 

From: Jim Duuuude [mailto:telesistant at hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:27 PM
To: ke2n at cs.com; app_rpt mailing list
Subject: RE: [App_rpt-users] one-way key-up delay

 

Oh the 2 nodes that have the "delay", try starring Asterisk manually
(first by doing a 'service asterisk stop' then 'asterisk -vvvvc').
The system is "running" when you get the CLI> prompt.

Does it hang for a little bit before it gives you that prompt. If so,
I think I may know what the problem is.

JIM WB6NIL

> From: ke2n at cs.com
> To: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:37:17 -0500
> Subject: [App_rpt-users] one-way key-up delay
> 
> My system has 3 PCs, two of them have "private" nodes (node number <2000
not
> registering with the Allstar address server).
> These private nodes are half-duplex or simplex links (duplex=1 in
rpt.conf)
> - they are connected to transceivers (and use DSP squelch/ctcss just like
> the main node). Everything is connected together by gigabit Ethernet
behind
> a common router.
> 
> When I key up the "public" node, the other linked nodes start transmitting
> in a fraction of a second. But, when I transmit into one of the "private"
> nodes, from a cold start, it takes 3+ seconds before the main node starts
> transmitting. Other than the very first fraction of a second, no audio is
> lost - it is just delayed. Once things are going, the time delay largely
> disappears (i.e., private nodes are now keying up during the hang-time of
> the public node). 
> 
> What is causing the long startup time? I can key up, say my callsign and
go
> back to receive, before the public node has even started to transmit.
> 
> At the moment, the nodes are running versions 267 and 266. Each of the
> [nodes] stanzas include the local IP addresses of the "other" nodes in
> addition to its own. If it makes any difference - the connections were
made
> *from* the public node *to* the private node.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

= 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20101210/d4fe8e7c/attachment.html>