[App_rpt-users] Speaking of CW IDs

[Mike/W5JR]

Sounds like good logic to me for supporting at least an increase in the Part 97 20 wpm limit. :)

tnx
Mike / W5JR
Milton GA

> On Dec 15, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Geoff <ars.w5omr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/15/2013 03:25 PM, Mike/W5JR wrote:
>> So, there is a "speed=" in the morse stanza. Does it have a governor on it to limit the speed maximum to 20 wpm? My entries greater than 20 make no difference.  And why would I want faster than 20 wpm you ask, my HUB nodes are only send "ID" to web transceivers, and I would like them faster. I have observed that at 20 wpm, there is a bit of jitter and faster may not be possible. (An ID I built years ago had a limit on how fast it could go before the code elements were overrun by timing)
> 
> I've been meaning to ask that same question.
> 
> Rules wise, since there's no CW requirement *at all* for 'any' license, then there shouldn't be a speed limit on how fast repeater id's should be limited to.
> 
> I like my code speed around 30~35wpm these days.  I used to copy NTS traffic at 40+wpm.  20wpm is such a '~*yawn*~' bore...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users