[App_rpt-users] Speaking of CW IDs

[Jim W7RY]

Yes. I just posted it about 2 hours ago.

20 WPM.
73
Jim W7RY

On 12/15/2013 6:33 PM, Jim Duuuude wrote:
> Isnt there something in part 97 about max speed for CW id?
>
> > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:30:28 -0600
> > From: ars.w5omr at gmail.com
> > To: app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Speaking of CW IDs
> >
> > On 12/15/2013 03:25 PM, Mike/W5JR wrote:
> > > So, there is a "speed=" in the morse stanza. Does it have a 
> governor on it to limit the speed maximum to 20 wpm? My entries 
> greater than 20 make no difference. And why would I want faster than 
> 20 wpm you ask, my HUB nodes are only send "ID" to web transceivers, 
> and I would like them faster. I have observed that at 20 wpm, there is 
> a bit of jitter and faster may not be possible. (An ID I built years 
> ago had a limit on how fast it could go before the code elements were 
> overrun by timing)
> > >
> >
> > I've been meaning to ask that same question.
> >
> > Rules wise, since there's no CW requirement *at all* for 'any' license,
> > then there shouldn't be a speed limit on how fast repeater id's should
> > be limited to.
> >
> > I like my code speed around 30~35wpm these days. I used to copy NTS
> > traffic at 40+wpm. 20wpm is such a '~*yawn*~' bore...
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > App_rpt-users mailing list
> > App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> > http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20131215/8d69a2d1/attachment.html>