[App_rpt-users] mikrotik and Allstar registration problem

[R Dahl]

Well, I have to admit, I wasn't sure whether this was the right forum
either. My network has 3 flaky wifi wan's and the routing mark/distance
settings have allowed for a simple failover system.  routing marks are
applied by the firewall based on ip's and works great for everything but
the connection from the allstar server to the rtcm or registration server.
Other connections from the allstar server work corrrectly and honor the
marks, (ssh, telnet, http, etc...)
All this leads me to believe there is something different about the allstar
arrangement that I haven't clued into.  I also tried applying the routing
marks based on mac but no luck there either.  Perhaps port and protocol as
well? As you suggest, I will try a mikrotik group
Thanks,
Ross.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc at inttek.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Ross,
>
> From what you describe, this isn't an Asterisk/AllStar problem at
> all--your router is load balancing across multiple Internet (WAN)
> connections.
>
> You need to add a source route for the IP address of your Asterisk server
> that guarantees that your router always uses the proper WAN connection for
> this host.
>
> I recommend finding a -local- MikroTik network guru. The problem with
> working on this kind of stuff remotely is that, with one accidental
> misstep, you're down and they can't get back in.  Oops!
>
> 73, David KB4FXC
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, R Dahl wrote:
>
> > I have an Acid (40526) server with an rtcm for radio connection.  The
> > mikrotik router has 3 wan connections with the acid server connected to
> its
> > lan ports as well as the rtcm.  My problem is that the registration
> > requests appear to go out an arbitrary wan port rather than the one I
> want
> > it to use.
> > I try to force it to use a particular wan by assigning a routing mark
> based
> > on its ip and then have the desired wan with the same routing mark.  This
> > approach works for splitting workstations and servers among the wan's but
> > the asterisk registration process ignores it.
> >
> > iax2 registration shows it as perceived as one of the other wans and is
> not
> > consistent.
> > traceroute from asterisk server shows it using the desired wan.
> >
> >
> > This is all mostly over my payscale.
> >
> > Ross
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20150903/5c7c009f/attachment.html>