[App_rpt-users] Outbound call problem! Unable to handle indication 13
Pawlowski, Adam
ajp26 at buffalo.edu
Mon Jul 18 15:38:20 UTC 2016
This is what I have for my node:
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstar Link IAX2" dst-port=4569 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=4569
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink chan_echolink" dst-port=5198-5199 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=5198-5199
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink SIP" dst-port=5060 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=5060
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink RTP" dst-port=10000-65535 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=10000-65535
I am not running a src nat for the IAX port outbound. I have the rule in the chain but disabled, so I must have determined I didn't need it.
It either does PAT correctly in the background, or isn't natting that port:
220controller*CLI> iax2 show registry
Host dnsmgr Username Perceived Refresh State
67.215.233.178:4569 Y 27709 67.242.153.201:4569 60 Registered
I installed the MicroTIK router to replace an Adtran device which was utter trash and refused to do a static PAT, and it's been working swell since, to the best of my knowledge.
If there's some reason I should be doing a source NAT for that port, I guess, let me know? I suppose it would only make a difference if I'm operating multiple nodes and didn't want to connect them together internally.
Regards,
Adam
KC2YQF
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list