[App_rpt-users] Outbound call problem! Unable to handleindication 13

[Pawlowski, Adam]

Eric,

                Thanks for your reply. I would assume that an ALG would be acceptable, so it would not be necessary to make such a sweeping arrangement of ports, but I had just thrown that in there to get it working.  This is connected to a cable modem, which seems to go up and down at various times, and has worked relatively well in keeping up with any issues. Really hasn’t’ been any trouble with it, seems plenty overkill and reliable.

Adam

From: ve3ei at iescomm.ca [mailto:ve3ei at iescomm.ca]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 12:48 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam; app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
Subject: RE: [App_rpt-users] Outbound call problem! Unable to handleindication 13

Forget what I said about RTP, I see you are using SIP. However, depending on your SIP server, you should not need that many connections. There are only 4 streams used per contact, so 100 streams should be suffient. Make sure the RTP are set on both the router and the asterisk server.
Eric – ve3ei

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Pawlowski, Adam<mailto:ajp26 at buffalo.edu>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 11:38 AM
To: app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org<mailto:app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org>
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Outbound call problem! Unable to handleindication 13

This is what I have for my node:

add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstar Link IAX2" dst-port=4569 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=4569
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink chan_echolink" dst-port=5198-5199 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=5198-5199
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink SIP" dst-port=5060 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=5060
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink RTP" dst-port=10000-65535 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=10000-65535

I am not running a src nat for the IAX port outbound. I have the rule in the chain but disabled, so I must have determined I didn't need it.

It either does PAT correctly in the background, or isn't natting that port:

220controller*CLI> iax2 show registry
Host                  dnsmgr  Username    Perceived             Refresh  State
67.215.233.178:4569   Y       27709       67.242.153.201:4569        60  Registered

I installed the MicroTIK router to replace an Adtran device which was utter trash and refused to do a static PAT, and it's been working swell since, to the best of my knowledge.

If there's some reason I should be doing a source NAT for that port, I guess, let me know? I suppose it would only make a difference if I'm operating multiple nodes and didn't want to connect them together internally.

Regards,


Adam
KC2YQF
_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org<mailto:App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org>
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20160718/329d109f/attachment.html>