[App_rpt-users] Verizon & Asterisk/Allstar
David Shaw
shawpbx at gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 15:27:52 UTC 2016
Fios does not like UDP packets. Verizon will not fix the problem. I live in
Murrieta, CA.. Good luck if you move to Verizon.
HOST: system0.ke6upi.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 72.67.127.1 0.0% 100 3.1 5.5 2.7 77.7 8.8
2. 130.81.146.122 0.0% 100 12.2 11.6 7.7 23.6 3.0
3. 130.81.199.98 29.0% 100 21.2 14.5 7.6 37.5 9.4
4. 140.222.227.15 74.0% 100 66.0 24.1 8.1 111.7 26.4
5. 140.222.227.19 0.0% 100 64.3 21.5 7.5 214.9 28.5
6. 152.63.114.213 1.0% 100 8.1 12.3 7.5 53.7 6.0
7. 80.91.247.171 0.0% 100 12.3 13.8 7.6 59.1 6.9
8. 213.155.134.77 0.0% 100 23.7 21.5 8.7 61.7 5.6
9. 62.115.134.159 0.0% 100 20.4 21.4 17.8 27.0 1.8
10. 62.115.134.171 0.0% 100 21.7 21.7 17.8 27.4 1.6
11. 162.213.61.60 0.0% 100 23.2 21.7 20.2 25.1 1.0
--
In 1988, America was strong. We had Ronald Reagan, Steve Jobs, Johnny Cash,
and Bob Hope. Today, we have Obama, no Jobs, no Cash, and no Hope.
Thanks, David
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:47 AM, George Csahanin <george at dyb.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick replies. I am, in fact, in NJ (Toms River) so the
> info from Apu is great.
>
> I was very spoiled for almost 20 years, first TCI cable (DFW) then AT&T
> with having static IP addresses but nobody in NJ (ok, two choices) provides
> that. With TCI (when it all worked) I had 4 addresses, with AT&T from
> 2001-2015 had a /29 network, five useable addresses. I miss it because AT&T
> didn't care that I was running mail/web/DNS from those addresses.
>
> FiOS and Comcast both offer static IP, but only one and for a large price.
>
> But y''all helped me decide to kick Comcast to the gutter they belong in.
>
> Thanks
>
> GeorgeC
> W2DB
> 2360
>
>
> On 03/17/2016 10:36 AM, Apu wrote:
>
>> I find the Comcast set-top boxes to be more responsive than the FiOS
>> STBs but, as far as Internet access, inbound access to various ports
>> (SSH, IAX, SIP, etc.), uptime, etc., I've had no problems in New Jersey.
>> Only port 25 outbound is blocked as far as I've noticed, which is
>> fairly typical.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down
> to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the
> "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email
> confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to
> the list detailing the problem.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20160318/585c0827/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
HOST: system0.ke6upi.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 72.67.127.1 0.0% 100 3.1 5.5 2.7 77.7 8.8
2. 130.81.146.122 0.0% 100 12.2 11.6 7.7 23.6 3.0
3. 130.81.199.98 29.0% 100 21.2 14.5 7.6 37.5 9.4
4. 140.222.227.15 74.0% 100 66.0 24.1 8.1 111.7 26.4
5. 140.222.227.19 0.0% 100 64.3 21.5 7.5 214.9 28.5
6. 152.63.114.213 1.0% 100 8.1 12.3 7.5 53.7 6.0
7. 80.91.247.171 0.0% 100 12.3 13.8 7.6 59.1 6.9
8. 213.155.134.77 0.0% 100 23.7 21.5 8.7 61.7 5.6
9. 62.115.134.159 0.0% 100 20.4 21.4 17.8 27.0 1.8
10. 62.115.134.171 0.0% 100 21.7 21.7 17.8 27.4 1.6
11. 162.213.61.60 0.0% 100 23.2 21.7 20.2 25.1 1.0
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list