[App_rpt-users] Simulcasting with RTCM/voter

Tue Mar 14 02:59:35 UTC 2017

RTCM's need rebooting too for the delay to take effect. At least my RTCM's seemed to require it when I set them. 

Also when I was experimenting I set the launch delay on the RTCM under test to the propagation time from the remote side to the site I was at. Then I put a dummy load on it (which I could hear from ~20 ft away). I could enable the remote site and listen to the two signals, see how the sounded and make sure that the settings were doing what was expected. Once set properly I could run audio through the remote site and key/unkey the local site under test with no noticeable distortion.  Of course this only works if theres a decent RF path from one site to the other. 

Cheers,
Jesse

> On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Joe Leikhim <rhyolite at leikhim.com> wrote:
> 
> Wow; 
> Great project. I suggest documenting everything and permanently posting for others to review the system design as a reference.
> 
> My background is in Public Safety LMR design so I have dabbled a bit in VHF, UHF and 800 MHz simulcast both analog and digital. I might be able to do some computer modelling for you. 
> Here is an example, picture two sites x1 and x2 spaced exactly 13 miles apart. 
> First: They both need to launch the audio waveform at exactly the same time T=0 in same phase.  This also means that there may need to be bulk delay to ensure that the most distant (with respect to the IP back haul network) transmitter site, receives the entire data payload before it is transmitted. I am just learning about the RTCM so I believe that bulk delay is inherent       to the process. 
> Assuming both sites are exactly synced T=0, then where the wave fronts meet midway will be in exactly sync even though 35.1us (6.5 miles x 5.4 us = 35.1 us) has passed due to propagation delay. 
> The wave fronts will also form a pair of theoretical opposing hyperbolic curves that meet at the center of the two sites like this: x1 )( x2  with the x representing each site. 
> As a mobile travels away from center and along or behind the hyperbolic curves )(, the time differential will increase, creating time differential interference (TDI), or intersymbol interference (ISI) in a digital system. This can be calculated at any point location by using a map and a mileage scale.
> A mobile very close to or behind either site (paced 13 miles) will experience the delay of 70.2 us or more. This is somewhat mitigated by the capture effect of the closest site and the capture ratio afforded by the modulation index. TDI at 70.2 us is not too bad for analog FM. 135 us, the distortion might be intolerable. 
> Adding a third site will require consideration that its signal may arrive earlier or later than the sites described above, In the event the third site is closer than 6.5 miles, the adjustment would be to increase the launch delay for the third site to meet with sites 1 and 2. If it is further than 6.5 miles, the delay of sites 1 and 2 could be increased equally by the amount required for site 3 to travel.
> 
> A variation of this scheme, is one where a central site is predominant and is ringed by remote sites. In one configuration, the central site has an omni directional antenna and the remote sites have directional antennas facing outward. The central site would be timed to transmit first, and the remote sites would be delayed until the wavefront reaches them. If the distances are unequal, the remote sites would be timed +/- the time differential of the central site reaching them.
> There are a couple very proprietary computer programs for modeling this, however it can be worked out by hand.
> 
> Some thoughts.
> 
> 1) Don't worry about frequency offset until you are sure the timing and other parameters are correct. Set everything dead on with GPS to start. In commercial systems using GPS disciplined reference frequency offset is usually not performed.
> 2) Make 100% sure that the modulators are wired for the same polarity. It makes no sense to have one transmitter deviating +4 KHz while another is going -4KHz. Same goes for voice and CTCSS modulation.
> 
> 3) Are your transmitters the exact same make/model and version? This can be a non starter. You can get away with different RF amps, filters etc, but if you have a Micor exciter and a Mastr II exciter it is going to be funky.
> 
> 4) The audio chain needs to be identical. Any filters, amps etc, in the transmitter audio chain must be same at each site.
> 5) Adjust the modulation limiting such that the transmitter audio is never in limiting. For Part 97 work, you could get away with the limiter adjusted beyond system deviation and set the RTCM so that deviation is equal to 5 KHz. Voice deviation for each transmitter must be identical, same with CTCSS.
> For my commercial projects I recommend the entire simulcast system be staged in a warehouse so that all these parameters can be set at same time with same test equipment in a controlled environment. Any errors must track the same direction. You can do this remotely, but noisy signals will make the setting of values less than ideal. If you reach a level of frustration, bring it all home and tweak it.
> I hope this helps!
> 
>> On 3/13/2017 7:15 PM, Hayden Honeywood       wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Thanks for all on the list who have given me a hand with getting the RTCM/voter boards running.
>> 
>> I currently have 1/3 of my system installed at the sites. It's as follows:
>> 
>> A TX only site - running a VOTER board, latest "Chuck" firmware. 9.6MHz OCXO replacing the onboard crystal and a 10MHz OCXO to keep the transmitter stable all on 53MHz.
>> 
>> On my bench at home I have an identical setup except with a receiver in addition. Both radios are the same, audio injected in the same spot.
>> 
>> I've been testing various frequency offsets to avoid the cancelling of the signal due to the inherent propagation effects at 6 metres. I've been able to run my bench radio into a dummy load and place it so that another radio nearby connected to an external antenna is receiving them almost the same (i.e. overlap). 
>> 
>> Currently 1-2Hz sounds the best. I have been encoding tone, however there is a very audible hum, as if the CTCSS tone from each transmitter is not in phase. The tone is 91.5Hz. I've checked/readjusted deviation levels etc, also checked the 9.6MHz OCXO etc but I cannot seem to null it out.
>> 
>> I've also tested the Simulcast Launch Delay.The main site is about 13 miles away, so I put a value of 330 in there to represent a delay of 66uS on the bench test radio. This makes a little bit of improvement, but not an overall huge improvement. Does anyone have an ideas that I've missed or more information on the usage of the Simulcast Launch delay?
>> 
>> Hayden   
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt-users mailing list
>> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
>> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
>> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem. 
> 
> -- 
> Joe Leikhim
> 
> 
> Leikhim and Associates
> 
> Communications Consultants
> 
> Oviedo, Florida
> 
> JLeikhim at Leikhim.com
> 
> 407-982-0446
> 
> WWW.LEIKHIM.COM
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20170313/d5ddd76c/attachment.html>