[App_rpt-users] Simulcasting with RTCM/voter
Joe Leikhim
rhyolite at leikhim.com
Tue Mar 14 07:25:10 UTC 2017
Jeff;
Yes True; It is indeed the _audio phasing_ that needs to be synced at
midpoint. I was trying to state in as few words as possible a very
complex topic. And yes, in the "real world" the reception will have
exaggerated multi-path effects due to the frequency error which are
unavoidable. I worked on some of the early crude analog 800 MHz FM
simulcast and my ears hurt listening to them.
Going from two transmitters to three or four (or more) becomes very
complex in short order. I have used computer software to simulate all
the effects to timing offset signal strength (reliability) and signal
capture. EIA/TIA TSB-88D describes monte carlo power weighted
methodology used in the computer models. Some software models can do
automatic iterations of timing to choose best fit.
Joe
On 3/14/2017 12:34 AM, Jeff DePolo wrote:
>> First: They both need to launch the audio waveform at exactly
>> the same time T=0 in same phase. This also means that there
>> may need to be bulk delay to ensure that the most distant
>> (with respect to the IP back haul network) transmitter site,
>> receives the entire data payload before it is transmitted. I
>> am just learning about the RTCM so I believe that bulk delay
>> is inherent to the process.
>>
>>
>> Assuming both sites are exactly synced T=0, then where the
>> wave fronts meet midway will be in exactly sync even though
>> 35.1us (6.5 miles x 5.4 us = 35.1 us) has passed due to
>> propagation delay.
> That's not correct (the part about "the wave fronts"). Simulcast audio/PL
> launch delay only guarantees AF synchronicity to the extent
> practical/possible (e.g. within a few microseconds of each other), but
> certainly not at the same RF phase. A microsecond at 150 MHz is 150 cycles.
>
>> The wave fronts will also form a pair of theoretical opposing
>> hyperbolic curves that meet at the center of the two sites
>> like this: x1 )( x2 with the x representing each site.
> Again, you can't look at it in the RF domain; AF sync is what you're working
> hard to achieve; you'll never get it at RF.
>
> Also keep in mind that sync at the midpoint isn't necessarily the goal. In
> a perfect world with no terrain, identical antenna patterns, identical ERP,
> etc. it might be, but not in the real world. You need to do coverage models
> for each of the sites (using actual ERP's and antenna patterns), see where
> the most-problematic areas are (i.e. the areas where capture effect isn't
> going to hide potential sins), and make decisions as to where to optimize
> and where to tolerate degradation, and then set delays accordingly.
>
>> 1) Don't worry about frequency offset until you are sure the
>> timing and other parameters are correct.
> Agree. Until the delays are correct (and again, that doesn't necessarily
> mean equal at the midpoint), there's no sense in adding another variable to
> the equation. Offsetting carrier frequency only helps mitigate cancellation
> nulls, it does nothing to mitigate delay errors.
>
> --- Jeff WN3A
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
--
Joe Leikhim
Leikhim and Associates
Communications Consultants
Oviedo, Florida
JLeikhim at Leikhim.com
407-982-0446
WWW.LEIKHIM.COM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20170314/ad5b324c/attachment.html>
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list