[App_rpt-users] Lies, damn lies, and John David McGough

Kevin Walsh w8khw1 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 23:16:11 UTC 2019


David,

I haven’t seen anything from anyone saying you need to publish your code under AllStarLink. You wouldn’t publish your code while Jim Dixon was still alive, so for me this ownership argument doesn’t hold any water.

Publish your code wherever you please. It’s yours, nobody should try to claim ownership of it and I for one would defend you if they did. You have made some great contributions, but you have also driven wedges into this community. 

I don’t care for how Mr. Fields has conducted himself at all. Just as I didn’t appreciate the constant bickering from Mr. Crompton about flaws in the usbradio driver that he could never seem to demonstrate or document. It was just childish nonsense. I was thrilled when Jim finally said “if you can do it better, go do it”. That’s how open source works. Many others have contributed to AllStar’s maturity. Are you going to tell us that Supemon wasn’t based on Allmon or Allmon2?

The code, Asterisk, apt_rpt, etc. etc. were all developed and published under GPL. Whomever is part of AllStarLink won’t own your code, nor have I seen anyone try to lay claim to anything you or Doug have written. The request has always simply been for you to comply with the GPL and publish your work.

Stop this BS now.

Kevin Walsh
W8KHW 



> On Jul 5, 2019, at 6:11 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc at inttek.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Joshua,
> 
> 
> I am now restating FACTS which have been presented multiple times. While
> various persons will quickly try and dispute these statements, to this
> date, NO ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn't
> truth. There continues to be plenty of hearsay and "oh, it's all GPL2" 
> comments.
> 
> The fact is that I firmly believe that app_rpt and some related software
> are dedicated to the public domain, as is stated in this document which
> was on the "official"  Zapata Telephony website from 2005 through 2016.
> See the fine print at the bottom of this document:
> 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20160315124205/http://zapatatelephony.org/Rpt_Flow.pdf
> 
> AllStar Link Inc (ASL) is an organization which formed after Jim Dixon
> died INTESTATE (he had no will).  I have not been presented with any PROOF
> that ASL has LEGAL ownership of *ANYTHING* related to Jim Dixon's estate.
> While various persons will quickly dispute this statement with hearsay, NO
> ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn't truth.
> 
> If you wish to lookup Jim Dixon's probate case, the case number is: 
> 17STPB08347
> 
> Go to this website and search for the case number:
> 
> http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/index.aspx?casetype=probate
> 
> 
> As a matter of record, no HamVoIP code comes from any ASL source (e.g. 
> github).  Our codebase pre-dates ASL's existence.
> 
> So, there isn't any "face to lose."  The HamVoIP team has done nothing
> wrong. My earlier post, which is at the bottom of this message, is simply
> a response to the stupidity of implications being made by others.
> 
> 
> Enough said, I've got other more important fish to fry. Now let the flames 
> (hearsay) fly.
> 
> 
> 73, David KB4FXC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Joshua Nulton wrote:
>> 
>> John don't go so far as to lose the dignity. Many of us in both aisles
>> respect you both as developers even though we don't agree with this move.
>> You're now making jokes about something serious and most who understand the
>> deeper issues know it is not a laughing matter, as a developer you know
>> this too.
>> 
>> I am not bashing you guys. I know you guys have good intentions. Doug too
>> is a good man. You have made Pi specific improvements, you know VoIP
>> networking very well (probably better than the ASL team) and your team
>> offers TONS of support to the public. But those of us who know software
>> (yourself included) also know you are not doing the right thing.
>> 
>> Forking software is one thing, and is acceptable, but that is not what was
>> done. You can not take open source software and brand it as your own
>> proprietary product, released as a package or not. I am sure you feel a
>> deep connection to it after all the years you've put into it, but it was
>> not yours to foster in the first place. Worse than that you are trying to
>> fork the entire community. It is getting ugly and you could fix it all so
>> easily. Your improvements are good, so commit it to master, take the credit
>> for it and be done with what could get nasty. Don't lose face on this. It
>> was a gift to all of us on the condition that it remain open, it really is
>> that simple. Have some respect for Jim and the team that gave us this gift.
>> Please just do the right thing and let's put this behind us.
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 2:49 PM Robert Ruddy <bob at ruddy.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 100% agree with everything you said.
>>> 
>>> Bob
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 13:37 Steve L <kb9mwr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I won't go so far as to suggest there could be something nefarious in
>>>> the compiled hamvoip code.  That is something that really on concerns
>>>> me with big corporations like Sony Rootkit scandal.  Here we just have
>>>> two groups of people who don't see eye-to eye.
>>>> 
>>>> The bigger problem is the folks (user base/end users) that don't see
>>>> the benefit of open source
>>>> 
>>>> Well I will share the reason I moved to Allstar (or more specifically
>>>> App_rpt at the time, because I think the Allstar branding came later)
>>>> from the IRLP platform was IRLP suffered the same lack of source
>>>> issues.  And I am no appliance operator.  I can only be satisfied so
>>>> long being and end user.  I wanted to modify things, change things
>>>> that that the closed IRLP platform wouldn't allow me to.  Allstar
>>>> became the answer to my prayers.
>>>> 
>>>> Sure Hamvoip can be a good place to start, but if you are like many
>>>> you will be unsatisfied at some point later.  Then there is the whole
>>>> what happens if some dies (like Jim did) or pulls the plug?  In an
>>>> opensource environment, the project can live on, like it has.  In the
>>>> closed source case, not so much.
>>>> 
>>>> Same reasons I moved away from DD-WRT (no source code) and favored Tomato.
>>>> 
>>>> Same reason AMBE bugs the heck out of me...
>>>> 
>>>> Aside from a good number of documents that the Hamvoip guy have out
>>>> there, I don't see how the project gives back to the community, other
>>>> than by providing something geared for appliance folks.
>>>> 
>>>> Ham radio is and always has been a work together thing.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:07 PM David McGough <kb4fxc at inttek.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> You forgot to mention that "secret spy" software included in the HamVoIP
>>>>> release is designed to dampen the Sun's double-oscillator, throwing it
>>>>> completely out of phase. With each new HamVoIP node deployed, the effect
>>>>> becomes more pronounced, ultimately causing a Maunder Sunspot Minimum.
>>>>> This, of course, is to the HamVoIP advantage, since no sunspots means
>>>> even
>>>>> more hams will need AllStar for communications. Which, in turn, dampens
>>>>> the Sun even more.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A movie is already in production. In this remake of the classic 1962
>>>>> thriller "Dr. No," SPECTRE is replaced SPARKY, AKA: John David McGough,
>>>> as
>>>>> the Arch villain (running Arch Linux, of course). In a twist of the plot
>>>>> from the original movie, SKYNET is accidentally created by huge
>>>> Raspberry
>>>>> Pi cluster, leading to world domination.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ....LMAO....
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73, David KB4FXC
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem. 



More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list