If you compile 32 bit code on a 64 bit machine don't you end up with 48 bit binaries?<div><br></div><div>Oh, come on guys, thats funny right there....</div><div><br></div><div>--<br>Don Russell, CBRE<br>Director of IT/Chief Operator - Maverick Media<br>
W9DRR - ARRL OES, Technical Specialist<br>Winnebago County AEC<br><a href="http://www.socialengineer.us">http://www.socialengineer.us</a><br>--<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 14:42, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com">hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
><br>
> From: "Ken" <<a href="mailto:ke2n@cs.com">ke2n@cs.com</a>><br>
> Date: 2010/02/09 Tue AM 10:21:49 PST<br>
> To: "'Steve Gladden'" <<a href="mailto:steve@michiganbroadband.com">steve@michiganbroadband.com</a>><br>
> CC: <a href="mailto:app_rpt-users@qrvc.com">app_rpt-users@qrvc.com</a><br>
<div class="im">> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit<br>
><br>
> Thanks Steve - see my question below<br>
><br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > From: Steve Gladden [mailto:<a href="mailto:steve@michiganbroadband.com">steve@michiganbroadband.com</a>]<br>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:38 AM<br>
> > To: Ken<br>
> > Cc: <a href="mailto:app_rpt-users@qrvc.com">app_rpt-users@qrvc.com</a><br>
> > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit<br>
> ><br>
> > Hello Ken,<br>
> > I've done it in the past by copying all of the scripts from<br>
> > a live 32 bit system over to the 64 bit system.<br>
> > I first did all of the Centos updates on the 64 bit system..<br>
> ><br>
> > Then I ran the stage2 script on the 64bit system..<br>
><br>
> =====<br>
> I would probably need more help with this than you could provide-<br>
> But, can you clarify - does this result in a "normal" 32 bit APP_RPT running<br>
> under the 64 bit OS?<br>
><br>
> Or does it use the 64 bit compiler, creating a 64-bit version of the<br>
> "forked" Asterisk code?<br>
> (This latter one sounds like it has some risk of not working).<br>
><br>
> Ken Jamrogowicz<br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> _______________________________________________<br>
> App_rpt-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:App_rpt-users@qrvc.com">App_rpt-users@qrvc.com</a><br>
> <a href="http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users" target="_blank">http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div>You'll get 64 bit code of the forked version it it compiles without errors. It may work or it may not work I don't know. You would be on your own and we would not be able to support such a build as it is outside of the scope of the project.<br>
<br>
Steve<br>
WA6ZFT<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
App_rpt-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:App_rpt-users@qrvc.com">App_rpt-users@qrvc.com</a><br>
<a href="http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users" target="_blank">http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>