[FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information

[vern at highwayusa.com]

Calm down, no one hacked anything and this isn't spam, you 
are a member of the FRC mailing list and that is why you 
are getting these.

Vern
KI4ONW

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:44:32 -0400
  "KJ4AN Wayne F" <kj4an at comcast.net> wrote:
> LOOK GUYS (and Gals) I want to be REMOVED from these 
>e-mails, I didn't ask
> to be part of them. FRC and Dana has ALWAYS been helpful 
>assisting me with
> issues over the years. I have had several repeaters on 
>the air in the
> Clermont-Lake-Marion-Sumter County area SINCE 1980.
> 
> 
> 
> PLEASE REMOVE MY E-mail from your 'SPAM-LIST', obviously 
>someone associated
> with these postings hacked the FRC info database.
> 
> 
> 
> *It is not necessary to be part of the FRC, they are 
>only an advisory board,
> monitor the pair you qualify to be on, know the band 
>plan, rules, and do
> your own thing if you wish, it's ultimately up to you, 
>not the FRC.
> 
> 
> 
> KJ4AN-Wayne Licensed Florida Amateur Radio Operator 
>since 1965
> 
>FCC General Radio License since 1985   #PG-GB-009142
> 
> 
> 
> (KJ4AN at Comcast.net)
> 
> 
> 
>  _____  
> 
>From: FRC-Info 
>[mailto:frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org] On Behalf Of
> kg4ugk at kg4ugk.com
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 8:26 AM
> To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion
> Subject: Re: [FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information
> 
> 
> 
> Back in 2002, Dana was extremely helpful in getting my 
>coordination
> completed.
> 
> 
> 
> Bryan, question. Why would you need a listing of unused 
>pairs? It seems
> counter productive to starting a new repeater, as well 
>as trying to find
> existing ones.
> 
> 
> 
> In my understanding and past experience, you request 
>temporary coordination
> and based on your location and desired output power, 
>they then assign you a
> frequency pair that won't interfere with existing 
>repeaters in the output
> powers RF range. They then give you time to setup and 
>test before providing
> full coordination.
> 
> 
> 
> Launching a repeater on an unused frequency pair, would 
>potentially cause
> interference to those setting one up in the future, and 
>would possibly
> result in a cease and deceit letter from the FCC when 
>someone else receives
> coordination for that pair.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Shawn Campbell
> 
> KG4UGK
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
>From: vern at highwayusa.com
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 6:58am
> To: "Florida Repeater Council Discussion" 
><frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
> Subject: Re: [FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information
> 
> 
> I must say that I have tried several times to contact 
>the 
> council to see if I could fire my repeater back up on my 
> old pair, and have heard nothing. I thought they were 
> defunct until I saw this email come through.
> 
> Vern
> KI4ONW
> 
>> 
>> P.S. Please feel free to discuss this on list. If you 
>>wish to not be a part of this discussion you can remove 
>>yourself using the link at the bottom. I'm happy to 
>>oblige your wishes via direct email as well if you have 
>>any questions. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>FRC-Info mailing list
>> <mailto:FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org> 
>>FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>> <http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info> 
>>http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
>FRC-Info mailing list
>FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>