[FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information

[Richard J Reuther]

Please... I beg of you, remove me from this list!

Rick Reuther
KC2HFL
Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:53, Bryan Fields <Bryan at bryanfields.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/10/16 5:46 PM, kg4ugk wrote:
>> 
>> We all carry ourselves a certain way when broadcasting on air, as we are 
>> governed by the FCC and choose our words wisely. All I'm asking is that we 
>> conduct ourselves in the same civilized manner we would on air.
> 
> I always encourage people to voice their viewpoint, in person, on air, or in
> email.  I also say the great thing about radio is if you don't want to listen
> to some one talk, change the channel.  I've had to do this a few times over
> the years.
> 
>> While we may not all agree with Brian's methods or tactics.. I actually
>> took the time to have a voice call with him and hear his side, as well as
>> have an articulated conversation on some of the practices of the FRC and
>> some other governing bodies.
> 
> Shawn, I appreciated your call and conversation.
> 
> As I said, I was not left with many options from the FRC leadership to contact
> the members via other means.  If anyone wants off this list, you can do or ask
> me.  I know we had some people with forwarded addresses and I needed headers
> to reconcile those.  I've removed most within hours of asking.
> 
>> Hacking/Cracking/Unsecured/Breached/Test what ever you want to call it..
>> according to the ARRL the FRC is the responsible party for coordination in
>> the state of Florida. According to ARRL the FRCs website is
>> http://florida-repeaters.org and according to their site, the information
>> was never publicly released and was obtained by other means.
> 
> This contradicts the information I've been given regarding how it was
> obtained.  I've been told it was on a public website.  I believe Mr. Fletcher
> is trying to deflect blame onto others.
> 
>> As I am on the fence about being contacted against the FRC, I have been
>> intrigued by this email list, it's put me in contact with some people whom
>> I probably wouldn't have had other means of reaching. The 20 emails from
>> the same person asking to be removed was more of an annoyance than the list
>> itself.
> 
> It's my hope the signal to noise ratio improves over time, and that seams to
> be the case.
> 
>> The fact that others are choosing to mirror this private information just
>> disturbs me further.
> 
> Others are mirroring it and providing access to the listings now that the FRC
> website has removed them.
> 
> Further all FRC me