[FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information

David Krauss nx4y at verizon.net
Wed Oct 12 08:56:35 EDT 2016


it's not hard to unsubscribe.  just click the link at the bottom of any of the emails and put your address in where it says unsubscribe, and unsubscribe.  not rocket science. 

Sent from an iPhone 6

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Frank Pliska <frankpliska at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> I have also submitted a request to be removed from the FRC email list 3 weeks ago  
> 
>                  Frank Pliska III
>                        N4PAO
>             RF Systems Engineer
>                    MOTOROLA
>         FrankPliska at Comcast.net
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Richard J Reuther <rjreuther at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Please... I beg of you, remove me from this list!
>> 
>> Rick Reuther
>> KC2HFL
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:53, Bryan Fields <Bryan at bryanfields.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/10/16 5:46 PM, kg4ugk wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> We all carry ourselves a certain way when broadcasting on air, as we are 
>>>> governed by the FCC and choose our words wisely. All I'm asking is that we 
>>>> conduct ourselves in the same civilized manner we would on air.
>>> 
>>> I always encourage people to voice their viewpoint, in person, on air, or in
>>> email.  I also say the great thing about radio is if you don't want to listen
>>> to some one talk, change the channel.  I've had to do this a few times over
>>> the years.
>>> 
>>>> While we may not all agree with Brian's methods or tactics.. I actually
>>>> took the time to have a voice call with him and hear his side, as well as
>>>> have an articulated conversation on some of the practices of the FRC and
>>>> some other governing bodies.
>>> 
>>> Shawn, I appreciated your call and conversation.
>>> 
>>> As I said, I was not left with many options from the FRC leadership to contact
>>> the members via other means.  If anyone wants off this list, you can do or ask
>>> me.  I know we had some people with forwarded addresses and I needed headers
>>> to reconcile those.  I've removed most within hours of asking.
>>> 
>>>> Hacking/Cracking/Unsecured/Breached/Test what ever you want to call it..
>>>> according to the ARRL the FRC is the responsible party for coordination in
>>>> the state of Florida. According to ARRL the FRCs website is
>>>> http://florida-repeaters.org and according to their site, the information
>>>> was never publicly released and was obtained by other means.
>>> 
>>> This contradicts the information I've been given regarding how it was
>>> obtained.  I've been told it was on a public website.  I believe Mr. Fletcher
>>> is trying to deflect blame onto others.
>>> 
>>>> As I am on the fence about being contacted against the FRC, I have been
>>>> intrigued by this email list, it's put me in contact with some people whom
>>>> I probably wouldn't have had other means of reaching. The 20 emails from
>>>> the same person asking to be removed was more of an annoyance than the list
>>>> itself.
>>> 
>>> It's my hope the signal to noise ratio improves over time, and that seams to
>>> be the case.
>>> 
>>>> The fact that others are choosing to mirror this private information just
>>>> disturbs me further.
>>> 
>>> Others are mirroring it and providing access to the listings now that the FRC
>>> website has removed them.
>>> 
>>> Further all FRC me
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> FRC-Info mailing list
>> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FRC-Info mailing list
> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161012/2963d443/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the FRC-Info mailing list