<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Yep.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net> </div><div>Date: 11/10/16 11:57 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> </div><div>Cc: tomray@hvc.rr.com, mark@stennett.com, dir1@florida-repeaters.org, kengkopp@gmail.com, k0pp@arrl.net </div><div>Subject: Re: [FRC] Possible issues with FL repeater coordination </div><div><br></div></div>On 11/10/16 11:32 PM, kg4ugk wrote:<br>> Was this board and the FRC made aware that you in fact helped spread the<br>> leaked database? Was the ARRL brought in to provide support?<br><br>The ARRL was made aware of these issues. They have chosen to stay out of it.<br><br>> I personally, dont like the idea of Bryan being apart of this committee.<br><br>I don't like that idea either.<br><br>> We<br>> are all not just hams. We live other lives, have other jobs. We should be<br>> able to personally choose if we want information available and our home<br>> phone numbers and addresses being immediately exposed with a quick google<br>> search of your own name now, everyone on this list should in some way feel<br>> violated. <br><br>You have all this information listed in the FCC database.<br><br>> Theres a reason even QRZ requires registration and log ins prior<br>> to the address you want listed on there viewable to other HAMs, not the<br>> entire free world. <br><br>Again, FCC database has this. I'm not sure why QRZ doesn't show it, perhaps<br>to encourage account creation as they are an advertisement platform.<br><br>> I don't want every person I hand my business card to be<br>> able to call me at home or stop by my house because I didnt call them back<br>> before close of day, as I'd imagine some of you may feel. As soon as this<br>> database was made viewable, and he facilitated the distribution of said<br>> hacked database, he officially made himself an accomplice to the original<br>> crime. <br><br>There was no crime and this is publicly available information. The FRC cannot<br>promise to keep your information private legally.<br><br>At the end of the day more information is on your voter registration than<br>what's in some repeater records.<br><br>> I do like the idea of the PDC, but as to the interactions and<br>> confrontational approach he has, would not be conducive to the survival of<br>> the FRC. Yes he has made some valid points, and a plan was put in motion,<br>> great.<br><br>Then get involved. What do you want to see change?<br><br><br>> Bryan himself previously stated that it takes the FRC too long to provide<br>> updates, and we've been waiting quietly for his update.. his first order of<br>> being appointed to a newly formed committee is to state he hasnt had much<br>> time to devote to FRC issues. It usually rolls downhill. <br><br>I've been waiting for replies to emails and things I've sent out. We've had<br>no movement yet. As you said "We are all not just hams. We live other lives,<br>have other jobs."<br><br>> Theres a reason<br>> that a chain of command exists. I am now CC'ing the NFCC board members, as<br>> the ARRL should probably provide additional support, after all.. they are<br>> the ones who govern whos ultimately the coordinating body for each state,<br>> but after the extensive actions taken on Bryans side. When we are already<br>> vunerable to hacks in the computer day and age, Bryan in fact is going to<br>> set us back and harm the FL ham community. I am also going to talk to the<br>> local hams in broward county that have a bigger reach into our local<br>> repeater owners than I do.<br><br>The ARRL does not want to be involved, I've contacted them.<br><br>> IMPORTANT.To appoint someone to a committee to stop his legal attempts was<br>> not a wise decision, contacting the FCC or ARRL for assistance in this<br>> dispute should help resolve this.<br><br>To make a contract contingent on a party forgoing legal representation is not<br>legal. I only was asking for a members roster and the results of the past<br>four elections from the board. The fact they refused to provide this to a<br>member is disgusting. At that point, what option does one have other than to<br>retain counsel?<br>-- <br>Bryan Fields<br><br>727-409-1194 - Voice<br>http://bryanfields.net<br>_______________________________________________<br>FRC-Info mailing list<br>FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org<br>http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info<br>Unsubscribe: <mailto:frc-info-unsubscribe@lists.keekles.org><br></body></html>