Leaving letigousness out of this, how far off is asterisk and app_rpt from being there and what would it take to get it to this level of reliability and stability? a bounty may be an option as well.
Eric
On 7/3/06, Steve Rodgers <hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> wrote:
My personal opinion, is that you would probably be better off buying a
solution from someone who you could hold accountable should the system fail
at the worst possible moment. Sometimes there are reasons for going with a
proprietary and costly solution. I believe your application is one where this
would be the prudent thing to do.
Steve WA6ZFT
On Monday 03 July 2006 13:39, Eric Fort wrote:
> I am looking at asterisk and app_rpt as a solution for a ship to shore
> communications platform where safety of life and property may be an issue
> at times. We will be using dispatch remote from multiple radio sites.
> Dispatch is now and would continue to be linked to the remotes via VoIP
> links. at each site there is also phone patch capability for ship to shore
> phone calls, the main service offered, along with radios for amtor, telex,
> sitor, and pactor modes for data, email etc. Is asterisk and app_rpt up to
> the task? bottom line it just has to work. Is it good enough that you
> would trust it to work if your boat was sinking and you needed a dispatcher
> to send help before the circling fishes found you tasty (propigation from
> dispatch to rescue not withstanding)?
>
> Eric
_______________________________________________
App_rpt mailing list
App_rpt@lists.illiana.net
http://lists.illiana.net/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt