From what I remember, they didn't want you
bypassing the long distance carriers by putting
telephone calls over the radio connecting a local
call to RF and terminating to another local call
on the far end. Once IP network is involved, the
underlying physical network architecture isn't
relevant. Lots of outdated rules still on the
books.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note8, an
AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2/12/19 10:08 AM (GMT-06:00)
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] GMRS linked
Repeater network using HAMVoIP
If it’s hooked to a telco it’s illegal. If you have
DSL or landline or any part of the system touches a
telco then the whole system is deemed illegal.
All the best, John Heron
561-334-6494
jh0932@gmail.com
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 5:29 PM,
fwbray@mminternet.com
wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, my comments only had to do
with whether § 95.1733(a)(8) prohibits transmission
of any audio received via "wireline" from a remote
source, such as a voting receiver. It didn't
concern the wisdom or other issues that impact the
legality of linking or whether one can set up a node
where the transmitter is keyed remotely over the
same "wireline" link that carries the audio.
>
> The concerns Kirk expressed are legitimate.
While there are technical ways of dealing with some
of them -- such as lock-out receivers -- many people
who set up links might not implement them. If one
wants to set up a linked system, one should take all
necessary steps to make sure that it operates
legally. However, with any repeater, there's no
guarantee that all repeater users will be able to
hear all local users in the coverage area who might
be using low power simplex. Similar issues exist
with amateur radio systems.
>
> I'm not sure that "Prepers" etc., would want to
depend upon an Internet linked system if they
thought it through. Unless you are using
independent RF links under your own control, VoIP
isn't a very robust system during a calamity.
>
> KE6CD
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 2019-02-11 12:31, Kirk Just Kirk wrote:
>>
>> Here is a MAJOR problem....
>> "GMRS" is a SHARED channel.Each station is
to LISTEN in carrier
>> squelch before transmitting. Since this
transmission does not extend
>> over the VoIP circuit, distant stations can
transmit on top of other
>> local stations, not knowing they are on the
channel.To be fully
>> compliant, each GMRS node would have to
listen on the channel for
>> activity BEFORE keying up!
>> All it would take is a written complaint
against a linked GMRS machine
>> to result in a violation, a NAL and a cease
and desist letter.
>> Inn reality, GMRS does not need distant
linking to fulfill it's
>> purpose. I know the "Preppers" and "Save
the world" types are going to
>> disagree....but thats the way it is.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
>
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
>
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter
your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or
edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you
can do it via email confirmation. If you have
trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the
list detailing the problem.
_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
To unsubscribe from this list please visit
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter
your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or
edit options button"
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can
do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble
unsubscribing, please send a message to the list
detailing the problem.
_______________________________________________