I just tried it on 27468, entering *227722, then I ID'd using my hand held radio on each repeaters input (27468, then 27722), then back on 27468 I did *80, the cwid of 27468 went out on the air of both repeaters. These 2 systems do not share any hardware. Both are running the code downloaded after the Feb 9, 2012 updates.
it is, I'll have to see if I can't reproduce it and let you know.
Thanks for looking at it Jim!
Alan
From: Jim Duuuude [mailto:telesistant@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:23 AM
To: app_rpt mailing list; adamson_alan@hotmail.com
Subject: FW: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
I have made good attempt at re-creating this problem, to no avail.
I have 2 nodes on a development server. 2007 and 2008. I can do a *22008 on 2007 and then do a *80 on 2007
and it only goes out on 2007. Is that the scenario that you were referring to?
JIMSubject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
I have also observed that some ids in monitoring mode do get passed on as if I was connected in transceive mode.
I seem to remember that this has been like this for some time. I guess nobody posted it to the bugs page.
Jon VE3RQ
On 5/29/2012 1:13 PM, Jim Duuuude wrote:No, normally (non-command) initiated ID's are always local.
The problem you are (most likely) seeing is that the command (the *80) in this case is getting
re-distributed to all connected nodes in the normal manner, even though the link(s)
is(are) connected in monitor-only mode.
Darn you for finding a design flaw!! :-)
I will attempt to verify that locally-initiated commands on a monitor-connected link
get distributed. If they do, they wont for long.. :-)
JIM
From: adamson_alan@hotmail.com
To: App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:06:25 -0400
Subject: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usabilityI don't want to be a bad operator at the moment… As I go about checking bandwidth and jitter, etc on my setup… I'd like to connect to an active Hub, but just in eavesdrop mode.
But I've noticed that if I connect with the *2 command, that if I inadvertently then do a *80, that the ID goes out on the link that was connected with the *2.
Is this true anytime my node decides to ID?
Alan
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________App_rpt-users mailing listApp_rpt-users@ohnosec.orghttp://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users