Well if youre going to get one of your neighbors involved, why dont you just
get their permission (of course) and have a wireless device on their network
and either put it on your existing LAN (assuming their local LAN netblock is
different then yours) or put in a second NIC card or something. chan_echolink
is perfectly capable of running as many Echolink nodes as you have (public) IP addresses
on your server.

> From: ke2n@cs.com
> To: rpt2@chuck.midlandsnetworking.com
> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:15:34 -0400
> CC: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 2 systems on one LAN, each with an Echolink number

>
> Convince one of your neighbors to run an asterisk box at his house.
> (a mini itx in the basement - he will forget it is even there)
> The only thing on that box will be the E/L channel.
> Then permalink your second node to this "E/L Hub".
> Done.
>
> Ken
>
>
> From: rpt2@chuck.midlandsnetworking.com
> > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 04:40:02 -0500
> > To: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
> > Subject: [App_rpt-users] 2 systems on one LAN, each with an echolink
> > number?
> >
> > I have 2 AllStarLink systems on one LAN. Each is for a separate
> > repeater system with a separate computer. They share a common
> > Internet address.
> > For AllStar they work fine. For EchoLink I can only make one or the
> > other of them work, but not both.
> >
> > Is there a way to change the port number of one of the echolink nodes
> > so that they can both use the same Internet address?
> > We want them both to be able to have inbound and outbound connections
> > via echolink, independent of each other.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users