On 12/08/2013 9:02 PM, Benjamin Naber wrote:
> Ramesh,
>
> Please explain test conditions, standards expected, and actual results.
>
> I'm running Limey Linux on a thin client. I am using
> usbradio.conf/chan_usbradio and I've experience zero
> hangs/freezes/drop-outs/you-name-it.
>
> DSP = CPU intensive? Unless you are running many nodes on one machine
> that use DSP functions, then I don't think so.
>

<-- Hi Benjamin;  I was using ACID on a HP T5710 (~1.2GHz proc with 256MB of RAM, IIRC).  I just tested with one node - if I used chan_simpleusb and half-duplex, the repeater worked fine (using an external controller of course).

If I switched to chan_usbradio, dsp, full duplex (removing the external controller), I found that the repeater would remain keyed after the input signal was removed.  I tried this a few times, got the same results.  So, since the HP worked fine with an external controller, I used chan_simpleusb.

For my own / current application, I am pursuing an IBM ThinkPad laptop Intel Dual core ~ 1.8GHz proc' which, I believe should work out fine.

Cheers,

Ramesh.

2182 / 2424 down due to (yet another) zapped SATA controller in an IBM Think Centre 9210.
_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users