This is one of those situations where you'll NEVER see any supporting proof that USBradio has inferior audio, because it's a fallacy.  You have these people that don't know how to PROPERLY deploy full DSP and then will go on to complain that it's inferior. 

I challenge anyone to prove that USBradio has any more distortion, any less audio bandwidth, any less dynamic range, or anything else deficient that ISN'T A RESULT of the intent of the software. 

If you people aren't doing it right, (to the point where YOU hear a difference) don't blame the software.  Use good radios and implement the hardware correctly, then you'll hear a difference all right, and it won't be because you used SimpleUSB (or not).

And by now I surely hope everyone understands that this judgement is only valid on the local repeat audio, as the transport audio can never be as good, and is a whole other ball of wax.

Kevin Custer



On 11/1/2015 2:56 PM, Fred Moore wrote:
Cory, You might have your hearing checked, you most likely think d-star sounds good also. 

I never said USBradio was horrible, simply said usbradio audio is superior.  It's a subjective thing, most can hear the difference.. obviously you can't or you would not have made such a statement...  

The only answer to the argument you want.. Fred

On 11/1/15 12:54 PM, Corey Dean wrote:
What degraded audio?  I have ran many many test and have yet to find this 'degraded audio'.    I have heard people talk about it but have yet seen any proof...