Great answer, Jeff! We KNOW that the MSF is designed for a 2nd receiver
tray and it would be nice if we had some direction. At least a schematic on that
sub-section. Nope. “It won’t work. Don’t waste your time... (or ours by asking.)
Thank you for your reply.
There is another say that we can go. We can use a RC-210 controller or even
a Zetron 38, a RC-100 – any number of external hardware controllers. But then
how will Allstar like this? With the RC210 we can put the repeater on port 1,
the receiver on port 2, and the RTCM on port 3 and then tell them all to talk to
one another? We even have some Vertex VX-4100’s that have 20 KHz channel spacing
and similar spec’s as the CDM750. Wouldn’t it be great to just solve the problem
rather than adding more hardware complexity?
It seems that Allstar is the solution as long as we can speed up the audio
delay. But then again if we vote will it matter? I mean , won’t they all have
some delay caused by the internet itself? Our biggest concern is with the
“primary” receiver going out to the internet and then back just for the repeater
to TX. What if the internet goes down? So then would our repeater. Our site
vendor has 25 sites connected over 5.8 GHz and if we used a VPN this wouldn't be
an issue. But we have receivers that will be remoted and this will require
internet rather than a VPN right?
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Motorola MSF / Voting /
Receivers;
I'll leave part 2 to one of the experts but as for part 1
The CDM makes a great receiver. Though it's less desirable to me than
an MTR2000 those just aren't in the budget. Its certainly easier to
interface to than the MASTR III's that I have on the bench now. It is a
mobile radio but in my installation I have 12 commercial UHF DMR MTR3000's all
running nearly 100 watts at the same site as my UHF receiver and they're only
separated horizontally and not vertically. My CDM receiver also has a
preamp and I've had almost no trouble. I did have a mixing product but
only when a 2 meter remote base transmitted on 144.890. I'll add I have a
pretty crappy duplexer on this but it is BP/BR and also has a pre-selector
between the preamp and the receiver. Still, they seem to have a "decent"
front end for a mobile radio.
73 de K0JSC