I would agree with Kevin. Every node I run is running DSP (with the exception of the RTCM's) and they sound amazing. From time to time it hear a "hiccup" in TX CTCSS mostly when monitoring with a motorola but thats it. The quality and fidelity is absolutely amazing and most of my users rave about it.de K0JSCOn Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Custer <kuggie@kuggie.com> wrote:On 3/27/2015 9:55 AM, Doug Crompton wrote:
------------snip-------------
Although there has been a slight improvement in usbradio in the latest svn it still does not have the exceptionally clean audio that simpleusb does.
73 Doug
WA3DSP
http://www.crompton.com/hamradio
Doug,
I have seen this statement from you many times. I have about 50 installations of usbradio where I don't experience these issues you claim. Will you please quantify your statement as to whether or not the issues you claim are for the BBB release, or any ACID release - and also if it pertains to only the BBB or any computer platform.
I have baseline performance specifications using usbradio and PC hardware. While the performance does change slightly due to the exact radio adapter device, the overall response and distortion specifications are very consistent when using G.722 -u-law. My performance specifications show that any distortions or response issues contributed directly by app_rpt, any channel driver, or the radio interface are well below detection by the human ear. In fact, I can guarantee you that more distortion is generally experienced when running simpleusb audio through any radio. In other words, there is more distortion and response issues because of the radio then from this application and its supporting hardware in usbradio.
I'll apologize that I had to hijack this thread from the arm-allstar email group and re-post it here - because I'm no longer allowed to participate in your group directly.
As Allan Crites would say - "Your turn"...
Kevin Custer - W3KK