A little confusion regarding the X86 Downloads
Hey all! As I reinstall my hub node after it got compromised this morning, I find myself a little confused at just which download option I should use for an amd64 architecture machine. The site seems to recommend DIAL RC1, but RC *usually* means Release Candidate - meaning it's not quite ready for prime time, but getting close to release. I would not usually consider a "RC" release to be the recommended release under any circumstances. The other problem comes from looking at the file modification dates on the dvswitch.org server: The RC1 file - amd64-i386-DIAL-RC1.tar.gz - is dated Nov 15, 2016 The other file - dial-allstar-netinstall.iso - is dated Jan 22, 2017 So it *seems* that the RC1 is older than the other one, while still being the recommended install - but the name would not tend to agree, as the RC should be a candidate for release as a newer version, so should be newer than the existing "stable" version - and the stable version should be the recommended download - or at least this is how it would work in most open source projects. What am I missing? And once installed, is there any danger in using the Debian "apt-get update" command to update the packages for the underlying Linux OS to their newest versions? Thanks, Jeremy, NQ0M
RC1 is the latest release per N4IRS. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Jeremy Utley <jerutley@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey all!
As I reinstall my hub node after it got compromised this morning, I find myself a little confused at just which download option I should use for an amd64 architecture machine.
The site seems to recommend DIAL RC1, but RC **usually** means Release Candidate – meaning it’s not quite ready for prime time, but getting close to release. I would not usually consider a “RC” release to be the recommended release under any circumstances. The other problem comes from looking at the file modification dates on the dvswitch.org server:
The RC1 file – amd64-i386-DIAL-RC1.tar.gz – is dated Nov 15, 2016
The other file – dial-allstar-netinstall.iso – is dated Jan 22, 2017
So it **seems** that the RC1 is older than the other one, while still being the recommended install – but the name would not tend to agree, as the RC should be a candidate for release as a newer version, so should be newer than the existing “stable” version – and the stable version should be the recommended download – or at least this is how it would work in most open source projects.
What am I missing? And once installed, is there any danger in using the Debian “apt-get update” command to update the packages for the underlying Linux OS to their newest versions?
Thanks,
Jeremy, NQ0M
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/ cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button" You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
-- -- Tim
participants (2)
-
Jeremy Utley -
Tim Sawyer