Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node without encoding PL when there is no activity? Thanks. Tony
I second that request… Our MSF500s never ID with PL, you get used to it. From: app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org] On Behalf Of Tony KT9AC Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:31 PM To: App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Subject: [App_rpt-users] ID without PL? Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node without encoding PL when there is no activity? Thanks. Tony
Why not just use the cop command that only encodes the PL when there is an active signal? Thanks,,, Corey N3FE From: app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org] On Behalf Of Tony KT9AC Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:31 PM To: App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Subject: [App_rpt-users] ID without PL? Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node without encoding PL when there is no activity? Thanks. Tony -- This message was scanned and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam.<%0ahttp:/simba.repeater.net:8080/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=902142F956.A785D%0a>
OK, I'll admit that was too simple. It does work that way...so its a tradeoff - either all or nothing. Thanks! Tony On 04/07/2011 08:37 PM, Corey Dean wrote:
Why not just use the cop command that only encodes the PL when there is an active signal?
Thanks,,, Corey N3FE
*From:*app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony KT9AC *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:31 PM *To:* App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org *Subject:* [App_rpt-users] ID without PL?
Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node without encoding PL when there is no activity?
Thanks. Tony
-- This message was scanned and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam. <%0ahttp:/simba.repeater.net:8080/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=902142F956.A785D%0a>
I've tried that as well, but find that it doesn't encode on link activity :( , but its handy to have locally! Jim, K6JWN On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Corey Dean <n3fe@repeater.net> wrote:
Why not just use the cop command that only encodes the PL when there is an active signal?
Thanks,,, Corey N3FE
*From:* app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org [mailto: app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony KT9AC *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:31 PM *To:* App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org *Subject:* [App_rpt-users] ID without PL?
Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node without encoding PL when there is no activity?
Thanks. Tony
-- This message was scanned and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam.
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
participants (4)
-
Corey Dean -
James Nessen -
Peter Elke -
Tony KT9AC