Hi All, I have noticed this is the message log and was wondering if this is normal??? [Aug 7 20:45:49] ERROR[8161] chan_echolink.c: connect() failed to connect to the Echolink server server2.echolink.org If it is normal, should I comment out the server name in the echolink.conf?? Angelo
If you have a number of servers defined, then it is just telling you a connection to one has failed and you should see messaging that it has moved on to another. You should have more than one defined. I have server 1, 3 & 5 in my listing. Keith On 8/8/13 7:48 AM, "Angelo Glorioso" <n5uxt@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have noticed this is the message log and was wondering if this is normal???
[Aug 7 20:45:49] ERROR[8161] chan_echolink.c: connect() failed to connect to the Echolink server server2.echolink.org
If it is normal, should I comment out the server name in the echolink.conf??
Angelo
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
-- keith@goobie.org Keith Goobie Richmond Hill, ON, CANADA
On 08/08/2013 13:04, Keith Goobie wrote:
Re: [App_rpt-users] Echolink Server If you have a number of servers defined, then it is just telling you a connection to one has failed and you should see messaging that it has moved on to another. You should have more than one defined.
I have server 1, 3 & 5 in my listing.
Keith
Mine does that, and if I comment the server out to prevent the constant log message, it won't connect to Echolink at all! Weird! J 29681
On 08/08/2013 06:48 AM, Angelo Glorioso wrote:
Hi All, I have noticed this is the message log and was wondering if this is normal???
I did. My /var/log/messages was filling up, and rotating till the point I have 4 archives of a half-meg each, all filled with the same error. I removed the line from the echolink.conf file. -Geoff/W5OMR
On 08/08/2013 09:11 AM, Geoff wrote:
On 08/08/2013 06:48 AM, Angelo Glorioso wrote:
Hi All, I have noticed this is the message log and was wondering if this is normal???
I did. My /var/log/messages was filling up, and rotating till the point I have 4 archives of a half-meg each, all filled with the same error.
I removed the line from the echolink.conf file.
-Geoff/W5OMR
I, too, have discovered by removing server2 from echolink.conf keeps me from logging into echolink. what the he**?
Echolink Server number 2 no longer exits. Edit the line to read: server2=server3.echolink.org N5ZUA ----- Original Message ----- From: Geoff To: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Echolink Server On 08/08/2013 09:11 AM, Geoff wrote: On 08/08/2013 06:48 AM, Angelo Glorioso wrote: Hi All, I have noticed this is the message log and was wondering if this is normal??? I did. My /var/log/messages was filling up, and rotating till the point I have 4 archives of a half-meg each, all filled with the same error. I removed the line from the echolink.conf file. -Geoff/W5OMR I, too, have discovered by removing server2 from echolink.conf keeps me from logging into echolink. what the he**?
As of this writing, I've discovered by a simple ping test, that 2 of 5 echolink servers are down. They are server2.echolink.org and server4.echolink.org Now, a simple ping test isn't all that inclusive, but it stands to reason (doesn't it?) that if 1, 3 and 5 respond to icmp requests, that 2 and 4 (if they were alive) would, as well? Just logic kickin' in. adjusting /etc/asterisk/echolink.conf accordingly -Geoff/W5OMR
Change all Echolink Servers to these and everything should be fine. I have been running these for many years now and never had any problems. naeast.echolink.org nasouth.echolink.org servers.echolink.org backup.echolink.org Vince VE3ELB On 2013-08-08, at 1:59 PM, Geoff <w5omr@att.net> wrote:
As of this writing, I've discovered by a simple ping test, that 2 of 5 echolink servers are down.
They are server2.echolink.org and server4.echolink.org
Now, a simple ping test isn't all that inclusive, but it stands to reason (doesn't it?) that if 1, 3 and 5 respond to icmp requests, that 2 and 4 (if they were alive) would, as well?
Just logic kickin' in.
adjusting /etc/asterisk/echolink.conf accordingly
-Geoff/W5OMR _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
thats what I use , but from time to time it will disconnect, the only way It will connect back is by restating the asterisk service. Envoyé de mon iPad Le 2013-08-08 à 14:16, "Vince P" <ve3elb@yahoo.com> a écrit :
Change all Echolink Servers to these and everything should be fine. I have been running these for many years now and never had any problems.
naeast.echolink.org nasouth.echolink.org servers.echolink.org backup.echolink.org
Vince VE3ELB
On 2013-08-08, at 1:59 PM, Geoff <w5omr@att.net> wrote:
As of this writing, I've discovered by a simple ping test, that 2 of 5 echolink servers are down.
They are server2.echolink.org and server4.echolink.org
Now, a simple ping test isn't all that inclusive, but it stands to reason (doesn't it?) that if 1, 3 and 5 respond to icmp requests, that 2 and 4 (if they were alive) would, as well?
Just logic kickin' in.
adjusting /etc/asterisk/echolink.conf accordingly
-Geoff/W5OMR _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
grumpy comment re echolink: ossified technology with users about as annoying as habitual kerchunkers and hams who think that 'technician' license means they're qualified to pull out their golden screwdrivers to 'improve' their rigs. -- Bryan Sent from my iPhone 5...small keyboard, big fingers...please forgive misspellings... On Aug 8, 2013, at 15:40, pete M <petem001@hotmail.com> wrote:
thats what I use , but from time to time it will disconnect, the only way It will connect back is by restating the asterisk service.
Envoyé de mon iPad
Le 2013-08-08 à 14:16, "Vince P" <ve3elb@yahoo.com> a écrit :
Change all Echolink Servers to these and everything should be fine. I have been running these for many years now and never had any problems.
naeast.echolink.org nasouth.echolink.org servers.echolink.org backup.echolink.org
Vince VE3ELB
On 2013-08-08, at 1:59 PM, Geoff <w5omr@att.net> wrote:
As of this writing, I've discovered by a simple ping test, that 2 of 5 echolink servers are down.
They are server2.echolink.org and server4.echolink.org
Now, a simple ping test isn't all that inclusive, but it stands to reason (doesn't it?) that if 1, 3 and 5 respond to icmp requests, that 2 and 4 (if they were alive) would, as well?
Just logic kickin' in.
adjusting /etc/asterisk/echolink.conf accordingly
-Geoff/W5OMR _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
participants (8)
-
Angelo Glorioso -
Bryan D. Boyle -
Geoff -
James Hill -
Keith Goobie -
pete M -
Steve Agee -
Vince P