I have also submitted a request to be removed from the FRC email list 3 weeks ago
Frank Pliska III
N4PAO
RF Systems Engineer
MOTOROLA
FrankPliska@Comcast.netOn Oct 11, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Richard J Reuther <rjreuther@bellsouth.net> wrote:Please... I beg of you, remove me from this list!Rick ReutherKC2HFLSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 11, 2016, at 10:53, Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net> wrote:On 10/10/16 5:46 PM, kg4ugk wrote:We all carry ourselves a certain way when broadcasting on air, as we aregoverned by the FCC and choose our words wisely. All I'm asking is that weconduct ourselves in the same civilized manner we would on air.I always encourage people to voice their viewpoint, in person, on air, or inemail. I also say the great thing about radio is if you don't want to listento some one talk, change the channel. I've had to do this a few times overthe years.While we may not all agree with Brian's methods or tactics.. I actuallytook the time to have a voice call with him and hear his side, as well ashave an articulated conversation on some of the practices of the FRC andsome other governing bodies.Shawn, I appreciated your call and conversation.As I said, I was not left with many options from the FRC leadership to contactthe members via other means. If anyone wants off this list, you can do or askme. I know we had some people with forwarded addresses and I needed headersto reconcile those. I've removed most within hours of asking.Hacking/Cracking/Unsecured/Breached/Test what ever you want to call it..according to the ARRL the FRC is the responsible party for coordination inthe state of Florida. According to ARRL the FRCs website ishttp://florida-repeaters.org and according to their site, the informationwas never publicly released and was obtained by other means.This contradicts the information I've been given regarding how it wasobtained. I've been told it was on a public website. I believe Mr. Fletcheris trying to deflect blame onto others.As I am on the fence about being contacted against the FRC, I have beenintrigued by this email list, it's put me in contact with some people whomI probably wouldn't have had other means of reaching. The 20 emails fromthe same person asking to be removed was more of an annoyance than the listitself.It's my hope the signal to noise ratio improves over time, and that seams tobe the case.The fact that others are choosing to mirror this private information justdisturbs me further.Others are mirroring it and providing access to the listings now that the FRCwebsite has removed them.Further all FRC me_______________________________________________FRC-Info mailing listFRC-Info@lists.keekles.orghttp://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info