??????????????????????

From: Dave Messinger H. <dmessing@pbcgov.org>
To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info@lists.keekles.org>
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:03 AM
Subject: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information

Gentlemen (and Ladies, if any) ,

I don’t know where you got this e-mail from. I truly doubt you got it legitimately from the FRC.

Regardless,

I have not asked to be included in this group or any discussions,

You are e-mailing my work/Government e-mail account (so everything is open the Florida Sunshine Law),

And finally, I have never had any troubles with the Florida Repeater Council. They have always acted quickly and fairly with any questions or registration I have had.

Mr. Fields,

I would ask that, in the future, you consider your actions a bit more before blindly e-mailing a large group of people with your grievances.

-----=====-----=====-----

Dave H. Messinger

Communications Specialist

Palm Beach County Network Support Services

FCC Licenses: N4QPM, WQCA678

Please Note: Due to Florida’s very broad records laws, most written communications to or from County employees regarding County business are public records, available to the public and media upon request. Therefore, this written e-mail communication, including your e-mail address, may be subject to public disclosure.

---

From: FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org] On Behalf Of kg4ugk@kg4ugk.com
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 8:26 AM
To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info@lists.keekles.org>
Subject: Re: [FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information

Back in 2002, Dana was extremely helpful in getting my coordination completed.

Bryan, question. Why would you need a listing of unused pairs? It seems counter productive to starting a new repeater, as well as trying to find existing ones.

In my understanding and past experience, you request temporary coordination and based on your location and desired output power, they then assign you a frequency pair that won't interfere with existing repeaters in the output powers RF range. They then give you time to setup and test before providing full coordination.

Launching a repeater on an unused frequency pair, would potentially cause interference to those setting one up in the future, and would possibly result in a cease and deceit letter from the FCC when someone else receives coordination for that pair.

Best regards,

Shawn Campbell

KG4UGK

-----Original Message-----
From: vern@highwayusa.com
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 6:58am
To: "Florida Repeater Council Discussion" <frc-info@lists.keekles.org>
Subject: Re: [FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information

I must say that I have tried several times to contact the
council to see if I could fire my repeater back up on my
old pair, and have heard nothing. I thought they were
defunct until I saw this email come through.

Vern
KI4ONW

>
> P.S. Please feel free to discuss this on list. If you
>wish to not be a part of this discussion you can remove
>yourself using the link at the bottom. I'm happy to
>oblige your wishes via direct email as well if you have
>any questions.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>FRC-Info mailing list
> <mailto:FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org>
>FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org
> <http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info>
>http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>

_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info

Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.

_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info