Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
Frank Echanique, you are a liar in big terms. Bring up one person that paid me for a freq. pair. Never in my life I did that. Dont press your luck! W4HN Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and grammatical errors in advance should they appear. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5. -------- Original message --------From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq@flecom.net> Date: 10/4/16 11:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information I tried years ago and gave up… The FRC completely killed any interest I had in ham radio repeaters… before you had to buy your repeater pairs from the district coordinator and after he was removed our district was dissolved and given to district 2, which is where most of our problems came from… At this point I have no idea if my repeaters are even coordinated anymore and honestly I don't care, they are on a government building sponsored by the Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management, and the only reason I maintain them is because they (MD-OEM) have asked me to.. if it ever became a problem I would just turn them off… then Miami would have exactly zero wide-area VHF repeaters and district 2 would finally win On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: Frank, Might give more details of your experience with the FRC. I think if any problems one has with FRC is voiced to the repeater community and the FRC, it will be addressed. 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com From: FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> on behalf of Frank Echanique <ki4ijq@flecom.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 10:28 PM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information people have had good interactions with the FRC? I can assure you that wasn't my experience… I don't think I have ever dealt with a more dysfunctional organization On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:24 PM, kg4ugk <kg4ugk@kg4ugk.com> wrote: Seeing that no one opted in for this email list, FRC did not provide him with contact information, and in fact tried/attempted to keep our information private. And the fact Bryan owns/hosts lists.keekles.org (the server responsible for this newly created list) I suggest that you contact his registrar/hosting providers abuse system to form a complaint. Enom.com: abuse@enom.com Registrant Name: BRYAN FIELDS Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: 501 80TH AVE Registrant City: ST PETE BEACH Registrant State/Province: FL Registrant Postal Code: 33706 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: +1.7274091194 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +1.5555555555 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: Registrar Abuse Contact: +1.4252982646 abuse@enom.com And as many of us have spoken up about our past successful interactions and the fact Bryan decided to leave them out on this thread, I've decided to copy the 'accused' on this email. He has clearly stated his request for our personal information was with held by the FRC, and that he proceeded to seek alternative means of acquiring our information in an effort to contact us. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Bob Dunkin <rldunkin@comcast.net> Date: 10/4/16 7:17 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information unsubscribe From: vernon ferris Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:09 PM To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information Hi Ron and John, I have dealt with Dana on three repeaters, mine and two that the county turned over to me as ARES EC for the county and as a volunteer himself he has done a good job. And I agree with both of you. Have a good week and keep your feet dry. Vern, W4NEK From: FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org] On Behalf Of mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 12:43 PM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information John, Yes, I think you are correct. Just seems I was not getting replies from others. have been getting today. It is good to have these discussions and the FRC does need guidance from us into repeaters. Just seems one guy has a beef and wants to take over and he has little to do with repeaters really. More of a club board member. And being into the internet service or an IT guy is very little tech knowledge of this subject. Engineering firms do not consider IT guys technical people. But they have a valuable place. I think the FRC does a good job, but they are often slow. Our District 4 director has responded to me quickly in last year when i need assistance in getting a pair for a repeater. not sure what other directors do. Dana is very slow, I think he picks one Saturday in the month and works on what he has received, hi. But he is very knowledgeable about the issues...has lots of experience over the last 20 years dealing with the issues. 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com From: FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> on behalf of Jon Pearl - W4ABC <jonpearl@tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:40 AM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information Good morning Ron, Is it possible that you're capturing all of the email messages from the FRC list server? It appears that you've somehow arrived at the decision that all are not allowed to communicate in this venue. Here are the archives: http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/ I posted a message to the group yesterday, and while it appeared to all on the list almost immediately, I personally didn't see it arrive in my own mailbox for quite some time. I see this happen quite frequently on the Tower-Talk list server. 73, Jon Pearl - W4ABC On 10/3/2016 11:47 AM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Bryan, It appears this discussion is between you and us, not between us and us. A real discussion would be between all of us. 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra And once more... On 10/3/2016 1:25 PM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com wrote: (snip) Just like this discussion and whoever started it, they are not allowing all to communicate. Do we want this in FRC??? 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
Hi Frank :) I have no skin in this game anymore ( I had a repeater on the air, took forever to coordination, never was notified my “coordination expired”, I have since moved and sold off the repeater )… however still have a nice NEW set of Bird Rx/Tx UHF Cans. If the FRC wants to serve and help the hams, stop being stuck in the 80’s make your database more user friendly, if Dana dies your all screwed. Its super simple to make a web based system that a user can enter their coordinate, height, antenna gain, rf output @ antenna, have the system check for an empty pair, then be put in pending until its on the air and the coordinator for the region can verify operation, once done, he can approve the coordination… it should take nor more then 5 days … the system should also send out an email in 10 and 11 months and remind them to mark its still on the air. The district coordinator should also be activity checking to make sure all repeater pairs in his region are active, that is his JOB as coordinator. As for Hams getting special treatment, or “it’s a good ole boys club” is possible, it happens in every corporation that has no oversite. As for how these email addresses were obtained? Most likely a member of the FRC gave it to Bryan, so before everyone throws stones at him, I think you should be throwing stones at those in the FRC that don’t want this list to be in existence. I welcome this list, we should have a “Florida Repeater Owners” email list that we call can use to talk to each other and help each other out, because we sure as hell don’t get help from the FRC when we need it. Hamster / KI4SWY From: FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org] On Behalf Of hernandeznilo Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 5:09 AM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information Frank Echanique, you are a liar in big terms. Bring up one person that paid me for a freq. pair. Never in my life I did that. Dont press your luck! W4HN Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and grammatical errors in advance should they appear. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5. -------- Original message -------- From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq@flecom.net> Date: 10/4/16 11:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information I tried years ago and gave up… The FRC completely killed any interest I had in ham radio repeaters… before you had to buy your repeater pairs from the district coordinator and after he was removed our district was dissolved and given to district 2, which is where most of our problems came from… At this point I have no idea if my repeaters are even coordinated anymore and honestly I don't care, they are on a government building sponsored by the Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management, and the only reason I maintain them is because they (MD-OEM) have asked me to.. if it ever became a problem I would just turn them off… then Miami would have exactly zero wide-area VHF repeaters and district 2 would finally win On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> <mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> > wrote: Frank, Might give more details of your experience with the FRC. I think if any problems one has with FRC is voiced to the repeater community and the FRC, it will be addressed. 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 <tel:352-683-4476> mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> _____ From: FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org <mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> > on behalf of Frank Echanique <ki4ijq@flecom.net <mailto:ki4ijq@flecom.net> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 10:28 PM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information people have had good interactions with the FRC? I can assure you that wasn't my experience… I don't think I have ever dealt with a more dysfunctional organization On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:24 PM, kg4ugk <kg4ugk@kg4ugk.com <mailto:kg4ugk@kg4ugk.com> > wrote: Seeing that no one opted in for this email list, FRC did not provide him with contact information, and in fact tried/attempted to keep our information private. And the fact Bryan owns/hosts lists.keekles.org <http://lists.keekles.org> (the server responsible for this newly created list) I suggest that you contact his registrar/hosting providers abuse system to form a complaint. Enom.com: abuse@enom.com <mailto:abuse@enom.com> Registrant Name: BRYAN FIELDS Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: 501 80TH AVE Registrant City: ST PETE BEACH Registrant State/Province: FL Registrant Postal Code: 33706 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: +1.7274091194 <tel:%2B1.7274091194> Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +1.5555555555 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: <http://reversewhois.domaintools.com/?email=c4af5e29ad2bf1ea52b555562b4b59f4> Registrar Abuse Contact: +1.4252982646 <tel:%2B1.4252982646> abuse@enom.com <mailto:abuse@enom.com> And as many of us have spoken up about our past successful interactions and the fact Bryan decided to leave them out on this thread, I've decided to copy the 'accused' on this email. He has clearly stated his request for our personal information was with held by the FRC, and that he proceeded to seek alternative means of acquiring our information in an effort to contact us. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Bob Dunkin <rldunkin@comcast.net <mailto:rldunkin@comcast.net> > Date: 10/4/16 7:17 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info@lists.keekles.org <mailto:frc-info@lists.keekles.org> > Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information unsubscribe From: vernon ferris <mailto:vhferris@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:09 PM To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <mailto:frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information Hi Ron and John, I have dealt with Dana on three repeaters, mine and two that the county turned over to me as ARES EC for the county and as a volunteer himself he has done a good job. And I agree with both of you. Have a good week and keep your feet dry. Vern, W4NEK From: FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org <mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> ] On Behalf Of mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 12:43 PM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information John, Yes, I think you are correct. Just seems I was not getting replies from others. have been getting today. It is good to have these discussions and the FRC does need guidance from us into repeaters. Just seems one guy has a beef and wants to take over and he has little to do with repeaters really. More of a club board member. And being into the internet service or an IT guy is very little tech knowledge of this subject. Engineering firms do not consider IT guys technical people. But they have a valuable place. I think the FRC does a good job, but they are often slow. Our District 4 director has responded to me quickly in last year when i need assistance in getting a pair for a repeater. not sure what other directors do. Dana is very slow, I think he picks one Saturday in the month and works on what he has received, hi. But he is very knowledgeable about the issues...has lots of experience over the last 20 years dealing with the issues. 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 <tel:352-683-4476> mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> _____ From: FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org <mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> > on behalf of Jon Pearl - W4ABC <jonpearl@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:jonpearl@tampabay.rr.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:40 AM To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information Good morning Ron, Is it possible that you're capturing all of the email messages from the FRC list server? It appears that you've somehow arrived at the decision that all are not allowed to communicate in this venue. Here are the archives: http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/ I posted a message to the group yesterday, and while it appeared to all on the list almost immediately, I personally didn't see it arrive in my own mailbox for quite some time. I see this happen quite frequently on the Tower-Talk list server. 73, Jon Pearl - W4ABC On 10/3/2016 11:47 AM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: Bryan, It appears this discussion is between you and us, not between us and us. A real discussion would be between all of us. 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra And once more... On 10/3/2016 1:25 PM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: (snip) Just like this discussion and whoever started it, they are not allowing all to communicate. Do we want this in FRC??? 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 <tel:352-683-4476> mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com <mailto:mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> _____ <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> _____ _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org <mailto:FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org <mailto:FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org <mailto:FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
On 10/5/16 8:04 AM, William Stillwell wrote:
Its super simple to make a web based system that a user can enter their coordinate, height, antenna gain, rf output @ antenna, have the system check for an empty pair, then be put in pending until its on the air and the coordinator for the region can verify operation, once done, he can approve the coordination… it should take nor more then 5 days … the system should also send out an email in 10 and 11 months and remind them to mark its still on the air.
It's not super simple, but certainly do-able. I do know I'm not the coder to do it, but I know people who could. Right now we coordinate on height vs. separation distance. This is easy to script. I do this when given pairs by the commercial frequency coordinator, as I have the fcc database loaded.
The district coordinator should also be activity checking to make sure all repeater pairs in his region are active, that is his JOB as coordinator.
An interface like repeaterbook.com has would be cool. You can see what's out there on google earth, and then up and down vote if a repeater is actually online. Getting enough down votes would spin off a request for the coordinator to verify it. Be a cool idea.
As for how these email addresses were obtained? Most likely a member of the FRC gave it to Bryan, so before everyone throws stones at him, I think you should be throwing stones at those in the FRC that don’t want this list to be in existence.
My database was obtained from an SQL data dump posted on reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/amateurradio/comments/543dab/florida_repeater_counc... I've contacted the 'frcdump' user to ask where it came from and have been assured it was obtained from a public source. As it's a database it cannot be copyrighted and is free to distribute.
I welcome this list, we should have a “Florida Repeater Owners” email list that we call can use to talk to each other and help each other out, because we sure as hell don’t get help from the FRC when we need it.
I'm all for this. I've found lack of communication can be a much larger problem than any interference. It's amateur radio, If I can resolve a problem by working with others, moving frequencies or retuning a duplexer I'm all for it. Other members groups have solved the issues of inaction or a policy which needs to change by way of a policy development committee. This is a group any member can approach with a written policy idea and they will assist with fleshing it out and proposing how best to implement it. This proposal is announced to the group on a mailing list and interested parties can debate it and add to it online. Once complete it's submitted for vote at the next meeting. If approved it becomes part of policy/bylaws. 73's -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
you can threaten me all you like but I've heard it from several hams, so unless the entire south florida ham community is out to get you.... and when I was looking for a pair there were none available but there was a 2m repeater for sale and you would get the pair for free... anyway you know as well as I do that getting a 2M pair down here was impossible for anyone except a select few people, and a ton of people had backyard repeaters using up pairs for no reason and then my favorite, I put a repeater up on 147.345 that was coordinated in district 2 to a silent key (seriously) and was off the air, a couple weeks later they discovered the error and said they were putting it up and the coordination was given to someone else but hadn't been updated in the listings blah blah blah On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:08 AM, hernandeznilo <hernandeznilo@gmail.com> wrote:
Frank Echanique, you are a liar in big terms. Bring up one person that paid me for a freq. pair. Never in my life I did that. Dont press your luck! W4HN
Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and grammatical errors in advance should they appear. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
-------- Original message -------- From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq@flecom.net> Date: 10/4/16 11:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
I tried years ago and gave up… The FRC completely killed any interest I had in ham radio repeaters… before you had to buy your repeater pairs from the district coordinator and after he was removed our district was dissolved and given to district 2, which is where most of our problems came from…
At this point I have no idea if my repeaters are even coordinated anymore and honestly I don't care, they are on a government building sponsored by the Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management, and the only reason I maintain them is because they (MD-OEM) have asked me to.. if it ever became a problem I would just turn them off… then Miami would have exactly zero wide-area VHF repeaters and district 2 would finally win
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com < mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Frank,
Might give more details of your experience with the FRC. I think if any problems one has with FRC is voiced to the repeater community and the FRC, it will be addressed.
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
Ron Wright, N9EE/R BSEE Micro Computer Concepts 352-683-4476 mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com
------------------------------ *From:* FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> on behalf of Frank Echanique <ki4ijq@flecom.net> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 4, 2016 10:28 PM
*To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
people have had good interactions with the FRC? I can assure you that wasn't my experience…
I don't think I have ever dealt with a more dysfunctional organization
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:24 PM, kg4ugk <kg4ugk@kg4ugk.com> wrote:
Seeing that no one opted in for this email list, FRC did not provide him with contact information, and in fact tried/attempted to keep our information private.
And the fact Bryan owns/hosts lists.keekles.org (the server responsible for this newly created list)
I suggest that you contact his registrar/hosting providers abuse system to form a complaint.
Enom.com: abuse@enom.com
Registrant Name: BRYAN FIELDS Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: 501 80TH AVE Registrant City: ST PETE BEACH Registrant State/Province: FL Registrant Postal Code: 33706 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: +1.7274091194 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +1.5555555555 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: <http://reversewhois.domaintools.com/?email=c4af5e29ad2bf1ea52b555562b4b59f4> Registrar Abuse Contact: +1.4252982646 abuse@enom.com
And as many of us have spoken up about our past successful interactions and the fact Bryan decided to leave them out on this thread, I've decided to copy the 'accused' on this email.
He has clearly stated his request for our personal information was with held by the FRC, and that he proceeded to seek alternative means of acquiring our information in an effort to contact us.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Bob Dunkin <rldunkin@comcast.net> Date: 10/4/16 7:17 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
unsubscribe
*From:* vernon ferris <vhferris@comcast.net> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:09 PM *To:* 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info@lists.keekles.org> *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
Hi Ron and John,
I have dealt with Dana on three repeaters, mine and two that the county turned over to me as ARES EC for the county and as a volunteer himself he has done a good job. And I agree with both of you.
Have a good week and keep your feet dry.
Vern, W4NEK
*From:* FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org] *On Behalf Of *mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 12:43 PM *To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
John,
Yes, I think you are correct. Just seems I was not getting replies from others. have been getting today.
It is good to have these discussions and the FRC does need guidance from us into repeaters. Just seems one guy has a beef and wants to take over and he has little to do with repeaters really. More of a club board member. And being into the internet service or an IT guy is very little tech knowledge of this subject. Engineering firms do not consider IT guys technical people. But they have a valuable place.
I think the FRC does a good job, but they are often slow. Our District 4 director has responded to me quickly in last year when i need assistance in getting a pair for a repeater. not sure what other directors do. Dana is very slow, I think he picks one Saturday in the month and works on what he has received, hi. But he is very knowledgeable about the issues...has lots of experience over the last 20 years dealing with the issues.
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
Ron Wright, N9EE/R
BSEE
Micro Computer Concepts
352-683-4476
mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com
------------------------------
*From:* FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces@lists.keekles.org> on behalf of Jon Pearl - W4ABC <jonpearl@tampabay.rr.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:40 AM *To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
Good morning Ron,
Is it possible that you're capturing all of the email messages from the FRC list server? It appears that you've somehow arrived at the decision that all are not allowed to communicate in this venue. Here are the archives: http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/
I posted a message to the group yesterday, and while it appeared to all on the list almost immediately, I personally didn't see it arrive in my own mailbox for quite some time. I see this happen quite frequently on the Tower-Talk list server.
73,
Jon Pearl - W4ABC
On 10/3/2016 11:47 AM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Bryan,
It appears this discussion is between you and us, not between us and us. A real discussion would be between all of us.
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
And once more...
On 10/3/2016 1:25 PM, mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
(snip)
Just like this discussion and whoever started it, they are not allowing all to communicate. Do we want this in FRC???
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
Ron Wright, N9EE/R
BSEE
Micro Computer Concepts
352-683-4476
mccrpt@tampabay.rr.com
------------------------------
[image: Image removed by sender. Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________ FRC-Info mailing list FRC-Info@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
participants (4)
-
Bryan Fields -
Frank Echanique -
hernandeznilo -
William Stillwell