[App_rpt-users] Port 4569 question - Multiple asterisk servers behind NAT ?

[Jim Duuuude]

ahhh no.. just specifing bindport should do the trick. Then you need to tell us so that we
can make the database aware of this.

> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:55:35 -0700
> From: k6kya at hokeynet.net
> To: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Port 4569 question - Multiple asterisk servers behind NAT ?
> 
> I believe you need to change the default port number in iax2.h and 
> recompile asterisk in order to change the port.  Registration will 
> automatically pick up that it's running on a port other than 4569.
> 
> The following line is what you want to change
> #define IAX_DEFAULT_PORTNO 4569
> 
> You can't just rely on juggling ports via your NATrouter.
> 
> Steve
> 
> On 6/28/2010 19:31, Stephen Rodgers wrote:
> > Neil Addis (WA5JXY) wrote:
> >    
> >> I searched the archives (&  google) for an answer to this. I've tried
> >> everything I can on this end (other than replacing the router).
> >> Anyone else have any insight?
> >>
> >> I have two Asterisk servers running app_rpt, each with it's own node #.
> >>
> >> One of them I have default port forwarding 4569 to the pc ip.
> >> Everything works great!
> >>
> >> The other I set up with different ip, and used port forward  (4563) to it's ip.
> >> I then set my iax.conf to append the non-standard port to the
> >> registration statement as follows;
> >>
> >> register=Anodenum:password:4563 at register.allstarlink.org
> >>
> >> I then checked the /var/lib/asterisk/rpt_extnodes to see if my
> >> non-standard port is listed, but even after 24 hours it still shows
> >> 4569.
> >>
> >> I tried bindport=4563 to no avail.
> >> I also tried bindaddr=0.0.0.0:4563
> >> I also tried bindaddr=192.168.1.106:4563
> >>
> >> Is it a manual thing the allstarlink sysops have to do?
> >>
> >> Is it possible to have multiple asterisk pc's behind a single  WAN ip
> >> - with port forwarding?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Neil
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> App_rpt-users mailing list
> >> App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> >> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> >>
> >>      
> > In the currently used registration system it probably needs to be specially set up by a node assigner. Please send me
> > your node off-list and I will check.
> >
> > Steve
> > WA6ZFT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > App_rpt-users mailing list
> > App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> > http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> >    
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20100628/ce4a6190/attachment.html>