[App_rpt-users] ID without PL?

[Tony KT9AC]

OK, I'll admit that was too simple. It does work that way...so its a 
tradeoff - either all or nothing.

Thanks!
Tony

On 04/07/2011 08:37 PM, Corey Dean wrote:
>
> Why not just use the cop command that only encodes the PL when there 
> is an active signal?
>
> Thanks,,,  Corey  N3FE
>
> *From:*app_rpt-users-bounces at ohnosec.org 
> [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces at ohnosec.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony KT9AC
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:31 PM
> *To:* App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> *Subject:* [App_rpt-users] ID without PL?
>
> Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node 
> without encoding PL when there is no activity?
>
> Thanks.
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> This message was scanned and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam. 
> <%0ahttp:/simba.repeater.net:8080/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=902142F956.A785D%0a> 
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20110407/69c28c31/attachment.html>