[App_rpt-users] ID without PL?

[James Nessen]

I've tried that as well, but find that it doesn't encode on link activity :(
, but its handy to have locally!

Jim, K6JWN

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Corey Dean <n3fe at repeater.net> wrote:

> Why not just use the cop command that only encodes the PL when there is an
> active signal?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,,,  Corey  N3FE
>
>
>
> *From:* app_rpt-users-bounces at ohnosec.org [mailto:
> app_rpt-users-bounces at ohnosec.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony KT9AC
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:31 PM
> *To:* App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> *Subject:* [App_rpt-users] ID without PL?
>
>
>
> Would it be an easy change to add a feature to ID the repeater or node
> without encoding PL when there is no activity?
>
> Thanks.
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was scanned and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam.
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20110407/c9a6a314/attachment.html>