[App_rpt-users] chan_simpleusb

[Jim Duuuude]

well *certain* people (you *know* who you are :-) :-) were *SUPPOSED* to be
alpha-testing a version that supports that. That was now at least a couple of
MONTHS ago! 

I dont suppose, Kyle, that *you* would be interested in doing that for me.. like NOW..
would you?? :-)

Thanks

JIM


> From: yokshs at sbcglobal.net
> To: app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:24:30 -0500
> Subject: [App_rpt-users] chan_simpleusb
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I thought I'd give chan_simpleusb a try again today. I thought I remembered 
> reading the parallel port support had been added to chan_simpleusb?
> 
> The parallel support didn't work, so I went digging through the archives, 
> and found that it was "on the list" of planned improvments.
> 
> I guess my question is, is it any easier on my P3/866 MHz Asterisk box to 
> run one RF node on the standard chan_usbradio and one on chan_simpleusb? I 
> currently have one modified CM108 fob, and one unmodified (using parallel 
> port for ptt/cos).
> 
> I've tried it both ways, while monitoring top, and it's not clear to me 
> whether the PC is happier one way or the other. The audio "glitches" seem to 
> have disappeared from the simple_usb node.
> 
> Thanks for any assistance.
> 
> 73.
> 
> Kyle
> K0KN
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20110730/3f2016c6/attachment.html>