[App_rpt-users] Echolink channel driver

Sun Nov 6 15:51:06 UTC 2011

Hahah Tehehe, you guys make me laugh. This was just what I needed to 
break the tension in my radio shack.

Listen, I have been attempting to get my first allstar server with one 
node up and running, and after 1 month, i am still trying to do a 
successful netinstall.

Tried VMware off Windows7 64bit, but it does not see the URI.
Tried a clean install on my new I3, nothing. Get all sorts of errors like:
"Could not allocate requested partitions: not enough free space on 
disks. Press OK to excit the installer."    (WTF! it is a 500GB SeaGate.)
That is with XIPER.

I was stupid enough to mention my ambitious goals to the club members, 
now they keep asking for a progress report.
I aslo tried ACID with no luck. Even tried a fresh install on my ASUS 
NETBOOK. Nothing.

I sent out a few weak email help requests, but got nothing back.
I need a *sh1t, shower & shave* but yet I still want to carry on until I 
drop dead.

Viva app_rpt, Viva!

BTW! we do need more documentation, BUT programmers don't write books, 
they program with there own language. You need a different Ham volunteer 
to be able to document this concept.
Does a baker ever try change his brake fluid? He he did, he would make a 
mess.

Mike, Leave the programmer alone to squeeze out all the bugs. Their 
human communication skills are not always the best.
Jim, keep up the good work you are doing in your department, and do not 
"Im removing it! , JIM WB6NIL"
I gues programmers are a special breed, requiring one to have thick skin 
to throw off all the bickering flung at them.

Shaun
zr5s

On 06/11/11 17:19, Jim Duuuude wrote:
> Well, for "extensive" documentation, I would look where one might find
> Sana Claus, the Easter Bunny, Elvis, Jimmy Hoffa's body (maybe), all the
> left socks missing from the laundry, and competent, reliable drummers. :-)
>
> In other words, it doesn't exist. It would be nice if someone who was 
> so inclined
> and able would contribute such a thing to our project. Unfortunately, 
> no one
> has done so to date.
>
> JIM WB6NIL
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: kk4ecd at gmail.com
> To: app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:13:37 -0500
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Echolink channel driver
>
> OK, ok. Don’t throw a gasket, Jim. I’ll leave it alone.
>
> Can you point me in a good direction for extensive documentation on 
> AllStar?
>
> Mike K4NUK / VA3PS
>
> *From:*Jim Duuuude [mailto:telesistant at hotmail.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:05 AM
> *To:* kk4ecd at gmail.com; app_rpt mailing list
> *Subject:* RE: [App_rpt-users] Echolink channel driver
>
> How why in the heck would you set confmode to yes? Dont touch it.
> It doesnt to ANYTHING the slighetest bit useful or desirable. You dont 
> want it.
> Dont do it. ALL echolink instances that run under app_rpt are 
> "conferences"
> ALWAYS. That parameter was put there to placate the original person 
> that was
> helping develop the protocol code for the driver. It isnt what you want.
> Im tired of running into people just randomly setting this, and 
> wondering why
> its broken. Im removing it!
>
> JIM WB6NIL
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: kk4ecd at gmail.com <mailto:kk4ecd at gmail.com>
> To: app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org>
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 08:25:38 -0500
> Subject: [App_rpt-users] Echolink channel driver
>
> Hi all,
>
> Been experimenting with echolink.conf, and have conference **EKOSTAR** 
> running based on that configuration file.
>
> Only one problem… as soon as I set confmode to =yes, it throws 
> segmentation faults. So presently I’m running it under confmode=no. 
> Any bright ideas?
>
> Included below is the error it throws.
>
> Many thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
>
> Best,
>
> Mike K4NUK
>
> sealink1*CLI>
>
> Disconnected from Asterisk server
>
> /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 125:  3687 Segmentation fault      (core 
> dumped) nice -n $PRIORITY ${ASTSBINDIR}/asterisk -f ${CLIARGS} 
> ${ASTARGS} >&/dev/${TTY} < /dev/${TTY}
>
> Asterisk ended with exit status 139
>
> [root at sealink1 asterisk]# Asterisk exited on signal 11.
>
> Automatically restarting Asterisk.
>
> mpg123: no process killed
>
> /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 125:  3794 Segmentation fault      (core 
> dumped) nice -n $PRIORITY ${ASTSBINDIR}/asterisk -f ${CLIARGS} 
> ${ASTARGS} >&/dev/${TTY} < /dev/${TTY}
>
> Asterisk ended with exit status 139
>
> Asterisk exited on signal 11.
>
> Automatically restarting Asterisk.
>
> [root at sealink1 asterisk]# vi echolinmpg123: no process killed
>
> k.conf
>
> [root at sealink1 asterisk]# service /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 125:  
> 3906 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) nice -n $PRIORITY 
> ${ASTSBINDIR}/asterisk -f ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} >&/dev/${TTY} < 
> /dev/${TTY}
>
> Asterisk ended with exit status 139
>
> Asterisk exited on signal 11.
>
> Automatically restarting Asterisk.
>
> asterisk mpg123: no process killed
>
>
> _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing 
> list App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org <mailto:App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org> 
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing 
> list App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org 
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2012.0.1869 / Virus Database: 2092/4599 - Release Date: 11/05/11
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20111106/d16f9fe1/attachment.html>