[App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
Alan Adamson
adamson_alan at hotmail.com
Tue Jun 5 18:57:46 UTC 2012
it is, I'll have to see if I can't reproduce it and let you know.
Thanks for looking at it Jim!
Alan
From: Jim Duuuude [mailto:telesistant at hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:23 AM
To: app_rpt mailing list; adamson_alan at hotmail.com
Subject: FW: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
I have made good attempt at re-creating this problem, to no avail.
I have 2 nodes on a development server. 2007 and 2008. I can do a *22008 on
2007 and then do a *80 on 2007
and it only goes out on 2007. Is that the scenario that you were referring
to?
JIM
_____
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:31:22 -0400
From: jrorke at cogeco.ca
CC: app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
I have also observed that some ids in monitoring mode do get passed on as if
I was connected in transceive mode.
I seem to remember that this has been like this for some time. I guess
nobody posted it to the bugs page.
Jon VE3RQ
On 5/29/2012 1:13 PM, Jim Duuuude wrote:
No, normally (non-command) initiated ID's are always local.
The problem you are (most likely) seeing is that the command (the *80) in
this case is getting
re-distributed to all connected nodes in the normal manner, even though the
link(s)
is(are) connected in monitor-only mode.
Darn you for finding a design flaw!! :-)
I will attempt to verify that locally-initiated commands on a
monitor-connected link
get distributed. If they do, they wont for long.. :-)
JIM
_____
From: adamson_alan at hotmail.com
To: App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:06:25 -0400
Subject: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
I don't want to be a bad operator at the moment. As I go about checking
bandwidth and jitter, etc on my setup. I'd like to connect to an active Hub,
but just in eavesdrop mode.
But I've noticed that if I connect with the *2 command, that if I
inadvertently then do a *80, that the ID goes out on the link that was
connected with the *2.
Is this true anytime my node decides to ID?
Alan
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20120605/b76f403e/attachment.html>
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list