[App_rpt-users] Speaking of CW IDs

[Bryan D. Boyle]

if you believe there shouldn't be...anyone is free to write a Motion for an NPRM (in the US) to the commission asking them to change the reg, submit to public comment if there is a good reason to do so, and implement the change.  

Be prepared to fully describe why you feel, technically, the current reg is wrong/out of date/etc and why your change would benefit and support the 'public interest, convenience, and necessity'.  

Without getting into arcana, it should be remembered that the FCC doesn't grant us licenses on their own authority, but on behalf of the People (theiretically).

Hint, based on experience, claiming other services have requirements that are permissive, so it should be applied to part 97, won't get a hearing.
--
Bryan
Sent from my iPhone 5...small
keyboard, big fingers...please
forgive misspellings...



> On Dec 16, 2013, at 13:43, Geoff <ars.w5omr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/15/2013 04:41 PM, Buddy Brannan wrote:
>> There shouldn’t be, but there is. I forget where it is, but 20 WPM is the max for legal automatic ID requirements, unless it’s changed.
>> On Dec 15, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Geoff <ars.w5omr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Right.  SOMEONE caught that I said "shouldn't".  Doesn't mean that there isn't.  I know what the law and the FCC regs says... whether or not there *should* be, it should be understood that my *opinion* is that it shouldn't.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users