[App_rpt-users] Speaking of CW IDs

[Tim Sawyer]

Hey guys, lets keep it on topic. We’re about app_rpt here not FCC rules. 
--
Tim
:wq

On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Bryan D. Boyle <bdboyle at bdboyle.com> wrote:

> if you believe there shouldn't be...anyone is free to write a Motion for an NPRM (in the US) to the commission asking them to change the reg, submit to public comment if there is a good reason to do so, and implement the change.  
> 
> Be prepared to fully describe why you feel, technically, the current reg is wrong/out of date/etc and why your change would benefit and support the 'public interest, convenience, and necessity'.  
> 
> Without getting into arcana, it should be remembered that the FCC doesn't grant us licenses on their own authority, but on behalf of the People (theiretically).
> 
> Hint, based on experience, claiming other services have requirements that are permissive, so it should be applied to part 97, won't get a hearing.
> --
> Bryan
> Sent from my iPhone 5...small
> keyboard, big fingers...please
> forgive misspellings...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 16, 2013, at 13:43, Geoff <ars.w5omr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/15/2013 04:41 PM, Buddy Brannan wrote:
>>> There shouldn’t be, but there is. I forget where it is, but 20 WPM is the max for legal automatic ID requirements, unless it’s changed.
>>> On Dec 15, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Geoff <ars.w5omr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Right.  SOMEONE caught that I said "shouldn't".  Doesn't mean that there isn't.  I know what the law and the FCC regs says... whether or not there *should* be, it should be understood that my *opinion* is that it shouldn't.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt-users mailing list
>> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
>> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users