[App_rpt-users] FLAT vs Preemphasized audio
KJ6KO
kj6ko at innercite.com
Mon Jul 22 16:15:40 UTC 2013
Have not heard about problems with "simpleusb.conf" ??? Any comments on
that?? New to the reflector.
Nothing but an HP 8920 and scope for levels! Only way to fly!
73 de Greg KJ6KO
Trustee NC9RS 900 repeater system.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin L. Naber" <Benjamin at kb9lfz.com>
To: "KJ6KO" <kj6ko at innercite.com>
Cc: <app_rpt-users at ohnosec.org>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 3:49 AM
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] FLAT vs Preemphasized audio
> The settings you have thought to be for usbradio.conf appear to be
> correct.
>
> Not sure about the simpleusb for DMK URI. You can use the DMK URI with
> usbradio.conf. I like the usbradio.conf over simpleusb, seems to me a
> lot of folks are having issues with simpleusb.
>
> Remember to use radio-tune-menu with a service monitor to ensure your
> TX/RX audio levels are set appropriately!
>
> ~Benjamin, KB9LFZ
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 23:15 -0700, KJ6KO wrote:
>> We plan on interfacing with a Palomar repeater controller which uses
>> FLAT audio in and out. It is designed strictly for disc audio in and
>> output directly to a radio's modulator.
>>
>> Would the settings.....
>> RXDEMOD = FLAT
>> TXPRELIM = YES
>> .... be correct to make sure the Palomar gets already pre-emphasized
>> audio in and audio coming from the Palomar to the URI is de-emphasized
>> in the URI before going out to the rest of the network? Many of the
>> other nodes on the network are using MIC inputs and "Speaker" audio
>> out.
>>
>> Would these commands go in the usbradio.conf file?
>> If it is a DMK URI, would the same commands go in the simpleusb.conf
>> file?
>> Seems I remember setting something like this in the initial DMK
>> setup...have only done one DMK.
>> Not sure if final unit will be a DMK or some other URI.
>>
>> ...I know...a lot of questions!
>>
>> Thanks....
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature database 8594 (20130721) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt-users mailing list
>> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
>> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 8594 (20130721) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 8594 (20130721) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list