[App_rpt-users] Echolink Connectivity Issue
Bryan D. Boyle
bdboyle at bdboyle.com
Thu Mar 21 20:33:46 UTC 2013
On 3/21/13 4:14 PM, Jim Duuuude wrote:
> Hmmm..
>
> I have never actually seen this policy before... somewhat disturbing...
>
> However, practical experience shows that Echolink seems to be perfectly aware of our interconnections
> and seems to be perfectly content with what we are doing. So, I guess its okay.... ???
>
> Jim WB6NIL
Hope so, though, to tell the truth, I'd not be lost if I had to turn it
off (as it is, it's just connected to a simplex node that links via RF
into the Penn Wireless system rather than my "allstar-connected" network
of 2/220/440/900 machines). The fewer drive-bys, the better. Besides,
with all the systems connected to the NJ/PA network (not the size of the
WAN system...), it cuts down on the noise/kerchunking/blind "CQ"
calling...)
I'm thinking it's in there for the CYA aspect more than Jonathan using
it as a club over repeater owners' heads. Not discounting that they
might...just that they've had no reason to.
But, one would think that with the experience of folks using or with
exerience in the 2 technologies, they'd come to some meeting of the
minds in the spirit of cooperation, fellowship, improvements, and
sharing ideas. Unlike other linking system developers who will remain
north of the border...oops, did I say that?
--
Bryan
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.
Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
You may quote me.
Sent from my MacBook Pro.
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list