[App_rpt-users] Echolink Connectivity Issue

Bryan D. Boyle bdboyle at bdboyle.com
Thu Mar 21 20:33:46 UTC 2013


On 3/21/13 4:14 PM, Jim Duuuude wrote:
> Hmmm..
>
> I have never actually seen this policy before... somewhat disturbing...
>
> However, practical experience shows that Echolink seems to be perfectly aware of our interconnections
> and seems to be perfectly content with what we are doing. So, I guess its okay.... ???
>
> Jim WB6NIL

Hope so, though, to tell the truth, I'd not be lost if I had to turn it 
off (as it is, it's just connected to a simplex node that links via RF 
into the Penn Wireless system rather than my "allstar-connected" network 
of 2/220/440/900 machines). The fewer drive-bys, the better.  Besides, 
with all the systems connected to the NJ/PA network (not the size of the 
WAN system...), it cuts down on the noise/kerchunking/blind "CQ" 
calling...)

I'm thinking it's in there for the CYA aspect more than Jonathan using 
it as a club over repeater owners' heads.  Not discounting that they 
might...just that they've had no reason to.

But, one would think that with the experience of folks using or with 
exerience in the 2 technologies, they'd come to some meeting of the 
minds in the spirit of cooperation, fellowship, improvements, and 
sharing ideas.  Unlike other linking system developers who will remain 
north of the border...oops, did I say that?


-- 
Bryan
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.
Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
You may quote me.

Sent from my MacBook Pro.



More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list