[App_rpt-users] Modified FOB vs URL

[Scott Zimmerman]

> The URI offers many extra features that most of us never touch.
Such as? I've been thinking of producing a lower cost alternative, but realize that the cost of a 
GENUINE CM119 alone is more than you pay for a whole FOB from your favorite Chinese supplier. You 
then add the cost of an enclosure and board to the parts count, things add up pretty quickly.

>> Lay the schematics side by side. The URI type device offers quite a few features not provided by
a modified FOB.
My USB-RIM device went several steps further down the "additional features" path. It seems there are 
few people that want to pay for additional features or better engineering. <shrug>

Scott

Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
474 Barnett Road
Boswell, PA 15531

On 10/13/2015 12:50 PM, W5JR Mike wrote:
> The URI offers many extra features that most of us never touch. Great if really needed. I do like the "professional" look of the URI versus a (my) modified fob at a shared repeater building.
>
> tnx
> Mike / W5JR
> Alpharetta GA
>
>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Steve Zingman <szingman at msgstor.com> wrote:
>>
>> To some extent you are comparing oranges and tangerines. :)
>> Lay the schematics side by side. The URI type device offers quite a few features not provided by a modified FOB.
>>
>> 73, Steve N4IRS