[App_rpt-users] IPV6 and upgrades --was: toy throwing time?

[Philip Dorr]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Toussaint OTTAVI <t.ottavi at bc-109.com> wrote:
>
>
> Le 14/09/2016 à 07:22, Stacy a écrit :
>>
>> As for running NAT, why?  One of the points of moving to IPv6 is to get away from using NAT.
>
>
> A NAT rule takes 10 seconds to set up for any network administrator, and it just works. Moreover, for those who definitely do not like NAT, there are plenty of 44.x.y.z AMPR IPv4 adresses available to the HAM community.

A NAT rule on IPv4 takes a few seconds, but one on IPv6 takes
hardware/software that supports it.  What was mentioned initially
about NAT was NAT64 which requires a NAT gateway to be setup, and is
not usually a simple matter of port forwarding.