[App_rpt-users] Allstar Node
Bryan D. Boyle
bdboyle at bdboyle.com
Wed Dec 26 19:11:39 UTC 2018
or ignore it and move on.
--
Bryan
Sent from my iPhone 6S...No electrons were harmed in the sending of this message.
> On Dec 26, 2018, at 12:52, Mike Besemer <mwbesemer at cox.net> wrote:
>
> The point is, Bryan loves to call people criminals but never does anything
> to deal with those individuals. Put up or shut up.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: App_rpt-users [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces at lists.allstarlink.org] On
> Behalf Of Willem Schreuder
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2018 12:45 PM
> To: Users of Asterisk app_rpt
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Allstar Node
>
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Mike Besemer wrote:
>>
>> So you've file a lawsuit?
>
> I am always surpized how many hams embrace the self-policing for amateur
> radio, but fail to see the similarities with the GNU Public License (GPL)
> for software.
>
> We as hams have the public trust for billions of dollars worth of
> spectrum. However, this comes with strings attached, in that we must
> promote and expand radio technology, and abide by certain rules. So when
> there are people who jam some nets, or use the spectrum inappropriately,
> WE take action to address it. Only in the most eggregious of cases does
> the FCC actually have to take an enforcement action.
>
> Just so with the GPL. I as a software developer have the benefit of
> billions of dollars worth of free software - a free compiler, a free
> operating system, and yes Jim Dixon's amazing work on Asterisk, all of
> which is covered by the GPL. Generally the software community
> self-enforces the GPL, and in the vast majority of cases, it is as simple
> as releasing the code. I do this because it is my obligation under the
> GPL, but I also license new work under the GPL because other people help
> improve what I started, and I still largely get the credit for it.
>
> Had the authors of Asterisk said: "We will not release the source code,
> but we will do a fantastic job in making sure Asterisk does all the things
> you want it to do", then Asterisk would have remain a telephone system.
> Only because they released the source code were hams able to extend it to
> The point is, Bryan loves to call people criminals but never does anything
> to deal with those individuals. Put up or shut up.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: App_rpt-users [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces at lists.allstarlink.org] On
> Behalf Of Willem Schreuder
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2018 12:45 PM
> To: Users of Asterisk app_rpt
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Allstar Node
>
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Mike Besemer wrote:
>>
>> So you've file a lawsuit?
>
> I am always surpized how many hams embrace the self-policing for amateur
> radio, but fail to see the similarities with the GNU Public License (GPL)
> for software.
>
> We as hams have the public trust for billions of dollars worth of
> spectrum. However, this comes with strings attached, in that we must
> promote and expand radio technology, and abide by certain rules. So when
> there are people who jam some nets, or use the spectrum inappropriately,
> WE take action to address it. Only in the most eggregious of cases does
> the FCC actually have to take an enforcement action.
>
> Just so with the GPL. I as a software developer have the benefit of
> billions of dollars worth of free software - a free compiler, a free
> operating system, and yes Jim Dixon's amazing work on Asterisk, all of
> which is covered by the GPL. Generally the software community
> self-enforces the GPL, and in the vast majority of cases, it is as simple
> as releasing the code. I do this because it is my obligation under the
> GPL, but I also license new work under the GPL because other people help
> improve what I started, and I still largely get the credit for it.
>
> Had the authors of Asterisk said: "We will not release the source code,
> but we will do a fantastic job in making sure Asterisk does all the things
> you want it to do", then Asterisk would have remain a telephone system.
> Only because they released the source code were hams able to extend it to
> do repeater linking.
>
> Only in rare cases where people continue to flaunt the GPL does it take a
> lawsuit to compel compliance, and these rarely go to trial because the
> cost of compliance is so trivial - just release the source code and you
> are in compliance! However, just like it sometimes takes the FCC to make
> sure that people comply with the conditions of their ham license,
> sometimes it takes legal action to force compliance with the GPL.
>
> In the end the GPL (just like our ham priviliges) is a social contract.
> We are granted an enormously valuable resource on the understanding that
> we will abide by a simple rule: you have to make your contribution freely
> available to others.
>
> So I sure hope that this doesn't turn into a lawsuit. That only serves to
> make lawyers rich. But in the end, it seems to me that the open source
> model has proven to be much more successful in the long run. I and many
> others have been able to make a decent living despite making our software
> available not just free of charge but free to improve. And in the process
> I have benefitted both in terms of getting credit for my contributions as
> well as well as from the clever things others have contributed to software
> I wrote.
>
> We don't have to be ugly about it and call people names. But the GPL is
> pretty black and white about the issue of releasing the source code. I
> don't know of a single case where somebody has eventually prevailed in
> arguing that you can start with GPL code and then refuse to release the
> source for the improvements. The GPL always wins out in the end.
>
> -Willem
>
> ================================================================
> Dr. Willem A. Schreuder, President, Principia Mathematica
> Address: 445 Union Blvd, Suite 230, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA
> Tel: (303) 716-3573 Fax: (303) 716-3575
> WWW: www.prinmath.com Email: Willem.Schreuder at prinmath.com
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and
> scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press
> the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email
> confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to
> the list detailing the problem.
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20181226/aad43e8f/attachment.html>
More information about the App_rpt-users
mailing list