[FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information

Mickey Baker n4mb at arrl.net
Mon Oct 3 11:35:46 EDT 2016


A couple of words of advice from an experienced IT engineer - who has had
an IT management position in Florida in the public sector as well as worked
at DoD:
1. Anyone who doesn't want unpredictable emails on their corporate or
government email server shouldn't subscribe to open lists. Get a free email
account, like this one from Google and point all the groups to that email.
2. Anyone hoping that what they write in an email could remain private
should learn to use email encryption. I won't go into details, but...
3. Anyone sending a plain language email should anticipate that email being
read by anyone anywhere.

That said, I've found the entire FRC to be a slow moving, difficult to deal
with organization with antique web sites. Some of the directors are a bit
gruff and condescending, but I find that a common trait among long term
hams, particular trying to relate to the current crop of no-code licensees.
I include myself, as I quickly lose patience with folks who don't know the
basic things covered in the license material.

I submitted a coordination request the day I got a message in May that the
W4AB 2m repeater coordination had expired - May 7, 2016. It was approved
over this weekend - almost 5 months to approve a registration for a
repeater that has been in operation on that frequency at that site for 28
years.

W4AB is currently not in the directory they publish, but now that the
"official" ARRL repeater directory is now RFinder, I can (and do) deal
directly with them for directory issues.

My local director (Mark) has been very responsive, but he doesn't have
direct access to add to or edit the database!

It is my understanding that coordinations are handled by Dana and he's the
only one with database access. Something might be going on in his personal
life that causes this delay, but it is the duty of people with
responsibility to engage with others to ensure succession of the
organization and the mission. This appears to be the point of failure in
many organizations but is key to the survival of that organization.

All that said, here's the problem - if everyone on the board resigns or
gets otherwise terminated, someone needs to have the time, talent and
inclination to immediately recover data from wherever it is and create a
new database and start up a complete new system, while doing all the things
the current FRC are doing now... this will require cooperation with the
current directors, particularly Dana.

Are we all ready for that?

If so, let's go get this handed over. Exactly where and when is the meeting
next weekend?

Mickey N4MB


Mickey Baker, N4MB
Fort Lauderdale, FL
*“Tell me, and I will listen. Show me, and I will understand. Involve me,
and I will learn.” *Teton Lakota, American Indian Saying.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Dave Messinger H. <dmessing at pbcgov.org>
wrote:

> Gentlemen (and Ladies, if any) ,
>
> I don’t know where you got this e-mail from. I truly doubt you got it
> legitimately from the FRC.
>
>
>
> Regardless,
>
> I have not asked to be included in this group or any discussions,
>
> You are e-mailing my work/Government e-mail account (so everything is open
> the Florida Sunshine Law),
>
> And finally, I have never had any troubles with the Florida Repeater
> Council. They have always acted quickly and fairly with any questions or
> registration I have had.
>
>
>
> Mr. Fields,
>
> I would ask that, in the future, you consider your actions a bit more
> before blindly e-mailing a large group of people with your grievances.
>
>
>
> -----=====-----=====-----
>
> *Dave H. Messinger*
>
> *Communications Specialist*
>
> *Palm Beach County Network Support Services*
>
> *FCC Licenses: N4QPM, WQCA678*
>
> [image: cid:image002.png at 01CAB493.44E57100]
>
>
>
> *Please Note:  Due to Florida’s very broad records laws, most written
> communications to or from County employees regarding County business are
> public records, available to the public and media upon request.  Therefore,
> this written e-mail communication, including your e-mail address, may be
> subject to public disclosure.*
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> *From:* FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org] *On Behalf
> Of *kg4ugk at kg4ugk.com
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2016 8:26 AM
> *To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information
>
>
>
> Back in 2002, Dana was extremely helpful in getting my coordination
> completed.
>
>
>
> Bryan, question. Why would you need a listing of unused pairs? It seems
> counter productive to starting a new repeater, as well as trying to find
> existing ones.
>
>
>
> In my understanding and past experience, you request temporary
> coordination and based on your location and desired output power, they then
> assign you a frequency pair that won't interfere with existing repeaters in
> the output powers RF range. They then give you time to setup and test
> before providing full coordination.
>
>
>
> Launching a repeater on an unused frequency pair, would potentially cause
> interference to those setting one up in the future, and would possibly
> result in a cease and deceit letter from the FCC when someone else receives
> coordination for that pair.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shawn Campbell
>
> KG4UGK
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vern at highwayusa.com
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 6:58am
> To: "Florida Repeater Council Discussion" <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
> Subject: Re: [FRC] Florida Repeater Council Information
>
>
> I must say that I have tried several times to contact the
> council to see if I could fire my repeater back up on my
> old pair, and have heard nothing. I thought they were
> defunct until I saw this email come through.
>
> Vern
> KI4ONW
>
> >
> > P.S. Please feel free to discuss this on list. If you
> >wish to not be a part of this discussion you can remove
> >yourself using the link at the bottom. I'm happy to
> >oblige your wishes via direct email as well if you have
> >any questions.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >FRC-Info mailing list
> > <mailto:FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org <FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org>>
> >FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
> > <http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info>
> >http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> FRC-Info mailing list
> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want
> your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do
> not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by
> phone or in writing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FRC-Info mailing list
> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161003/65c66d26/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11654 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161003/65c66d26/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the FRC-Info mailing list