[FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
hernandeznilo
hernandeznilo at gmail.com
Fri Oct 7 22:15:26 EDT 2016
You are just writing nonsense. I call you a liar because you are a liar. Never in my life did I take a penny from anyone. And yes.. you were right eith that pair in D2 and I fought for you but at the FRC there is discrimination.You got a pair as my pwrsonal friend and I discussed it and gave you the pair you have for FREE.Did you pay someone for it? You are not worth it...
Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and grammatical errors in advance should they appear. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
-------- Original message --------From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net> Date: 10/7/16 4:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info at lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
you can threaten me all you like but I've heard it from several hams, so unless the entire south florida ham community is out to get you.... and when I was looking for a pair there were none available but there was a 2m repeater for sale and you would get the pair for free... anyway you know as well as I do that getting a 2M pair down here was impossible for anyone except a select few people, and a ton of people had backyard repeaters using up pairs for no reason
and then my favorite, I put a repeater up on 147.345 that was coordinated in district 2 to a silent key (seriously) and was off the air, a couple weeks later they discovered the error and said they were putting it up and the coordination was given to someone else but hadn't been updated in the listings blah blah blah
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:08 AM, hernandeznilo <hernandeznilo at gmail.com> wrote:
Frank Echanique, you are a liar in big terms. Bring up one person that paid me for a freq. pair. Never in my life I did that. Dont press your luck! W4HN
Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and grammatical errors in advance should they appear. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
-------- Original message --------From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net> Date: 10/4/16 11:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info at lists.keekles.org> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
I tried years ago and gave up… The FRC completely killed any interest I had in ham radio repeaters… before you had to buy your repeater pairs from the district coordinator and after he was removed our district was dissolved and given to district 2, which is where most of our problems came from…
At this point I have no idea if my repeaters are even coordinated anymore and honestly I don't care, they are on a government building sponsored by the Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management, and the only reason I maintain them is because they (MD-OEM) have asked me to.. if it ever became a problem I would just turn them off… then Miami would have exactly zero wide-area VHF repeaters and district 2 would finally win
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com <mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Frank,
Might give more details of your experience with the FRC. I think if any problems one has with FRC is voiced to the repeater community and the FRC, it will be addressed.
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
Ron Wright, N9EE/R
BSEE
Micro Computer Concepts
352-683-4476
mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
From: FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org> on behalf of Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 10:28 PM
To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion
Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
people have had good interactions with the FRC? I can assure you that wasn't my experience…
I don't think I have ever dealt with a more dysfunctional organization
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:24 PM, kg4ugk
<kg4ugk at kg4ugk.com> wrote:
Seeing that no one opted in for this email list, FRC did not provide him with contact information, and in fact tried/attempted to keep our information private.
And the fact Bryan owns/hosts
lists.keekles.org (the server responsible for this newly created list)
I suggest that you contact his registrar/hosting providers abuse system to form a complaint.
Enom.com:
abuse at enom.com
Registrant Name: BRYAN FIELDS
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 501 80TH AVE
Registrant City: ST PETE BEACH
Registrant State/Province: FL
Registrant Postal Code: 33706
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.7274091194
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +1.5555555555
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact:
+1.4252982646
abuse at enom.com
And as many of us have spoken up about our past successful interactions and the fact Bryan decided to leave them out on this thread, I've decided to copy the 'accused' on this email.
He has clearly stated his request for our personal information was with held by the FRC, and that he proceeded to seek alternative means of acquiring our information in an effort to contact us.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
From: Bob Dunkin <rldunkin at comcast.net>
Date: 10/4/16 7:17 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
unsubscribe
From:
vernon ferris
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:09 PM
To:
'Florida Repeater Council Discussion'
Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
Hi Ron and John,
I have dealt with Dana on three repeaters, mine and two that the county turned over to me as ARES EC for the county and as a volunteer himself he has done a
good job. And I agree with both of you.
Have a good week and keep your feet dry.
Vern, W4NEK
From: FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org]
On Behalf Of mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 12:43 PM
To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion
Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
John,
Yes, I think you are correct. Just seems I was not getting replies from others. have been getting today.
It is good to have these discussions and the FRC does need guidance from us into repeaters. Just seems one guy has a beef and wants to take over and he has little to do with repeaters really.
More of a club board member. And being into the internet service or an IT guy is very little tech knowledge of this subject. Engineering firms do not consider IT guys technical people. But they have a valuable place.
I think the FRC does a good job, but they are often slow. Our District 4 director has responded to me quickly in last year when i need assistance in getting a pair for a repeater. not sure what
other directors do. Dana is very slow, I think he picks one Saturday in the month and works on what he has received, hi. But he is very knowledgeable about the issues...has lots of experience over the last 20 years dealing with the issues.
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
Ron Wright, N9EE/R
BSEE
Micro Computer Concepts
352-683-4476
mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
From: FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org>
on behalf of Jon Pearl - W4ABC <jonpearl at tampabay.rr.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:40 AM
To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion
Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
Good morning Ron,
Is it possible that you're capturing all of the email messages from the FRC list server? It appears that you've somehow arrived at the decision that all are not allowed to communicate in this
venue. Here are the archives:
http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/
I posted a message to the group yesterday, and while it appeared to all on the list almost immediately, I personally didn't see it arrive in my own mailbox for quite some time. I see this happen
quite frequently on the Tower-Talk list server.
73,
Jon Pearl - W4ABC
On 10/3/2016 11:47 AM,
mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Bryan,
It appears this discussion is between you and us, not between us and us. A real discussion would be between all of us.
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
And once more...
On 10/3/2016 1:25 PM,
mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com wrote:
(snip)
Just like this discussion and whoever started it, they are not allowing all to communicate. Do we want this in FRC???
73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
Ron Wright, N9EE/R
BSEE
Micro Computer Concepts
352-683-4476
mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
_______________________________________________
FRC-Info mailing list
FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161007/89430cec/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD145.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161007/89430cec/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the FRC-Info
mailing list