[FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information

Sat Oct 8 09:56:21 EDT 2016

Sure... discrimination and because District 2 Director and Vice were
running their mouth, and I just cant stand double face people. They group
with another bad example as Director and Ham who is Mike and  put  pressure
on others to vote me out. They ran an illegal election for three reasons:
1. Because they admitted a Ham from D2 to run against rules; 2. Because
they ran an election in an odd year against the rules; and 3. Anyways,
another Latin or Cuban won the election and because he was Latin, the
election was nullified. These are the real reasons, but if you have other
stories... come up with it.  Because they don't follow the Rules
themselves. They don't know them or plainly they run a dictatorship. The
discrimination and illegal activities from those bad Directors destroyed
the largest and most productive District. But, Hams in Dade do not care to
act or fight....
A group was formed and we were ready to form a new Coordinating body, but
some in the group didn't want to work much. Time and efforts are needed to
get it done. We bought the program and were ready to start, but as I wrote
before....????? This Miami-Dade County should had started their own
Coordinating body long ago, and spread around the State. I am not
interested in being a Director, but I am willing to help in forming one
that will clear all of the flaws of the FRC.
You guys are young and full of energy and can start it. Its a challenge!
Out of all of them, I was the third oldest Director and I gave many years
of my life to the FRC and Ham radio as a whole, but unfortunately, some
members came in to destroy our hobby. I am very proud of my
accomplishments...

Nilo A. Hernandez, M.S.
Personal: HernandezNilo at gmail.com
AARP: nhernandez at aarp.org

305-219-2252

*Confidentiality Notice*: This e-mail message may contain confidential or
proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net> wrote:

> Wasn't even for me, was for Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management
>
> Honestly all that is so far in the past I don't even feel like wasting the
> energy arguing it
>
> You want to share why you were removed fro district 1?
> On Oct 7, 2016 10:15 PM, "hernandeznilo" <hernandeznilo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You are just writing nonsense. I call you a liar because you are a liar.
>> Never in my life did I take a penny from anyone. And yes..  you were right
>> eith that pair in D2 and I fought for you but at the FRC there is
>> discrimination.
>> You got a pair as my pwrsonal friend and I discussed it and gave you the
>> pair you have for FREE.
>> Did you pay someone for it? You are not worth it...
>>
>>
>>
>> Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and
>> grammatical errors in advance should they appear.
>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net>
>> Date: 10/7/16 4:37 PM (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
>> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>
>> you can threaten me all you like but I've heard it from several hams, so
>> unless the entire south florida ham community is out to get you.... and
>> when I was looking for a pair there were none available but there was a 2m
>> repeater for sale and you would get the pair for free... anyway you know as
>> well as I do that getting a 2M pair down here was impossible for anyone
>> except a select few people, and a ton of people had backyard repeaters
>> using up pairs for no reason
>>
>> and then my favorite, I put a repeater up on 147.345 that was coordinated
>> in district 2 to a silent key (seriously) and was off the air, a couple
>> weeks later they discovered the error and said they were putting it up and
>> the coordination was given to someone else but hadn't been updated in the
>> listings blah blah blah
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:08 AM, hernandeznilo <hernandeznilo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Frank Echanique, you are a liar in big terms. Bring up one person that
>>> paid me for a freq. pair. Never in my life I did that. Dont press your
>>> luck! W4HN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please pardon my errors as the cell changes some, pardon typos and
>>> grammatical errors in advance should they appear.
>>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
>>>
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net>
>>> Date: 10/4/16 11:37 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: Florida Repeater Council Discussion <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>>
>>> I tried years ago and gave up… The FRC completely killed any interest I
>>> had in ham radio repeaters… before you had to buy your repeater pairs from
>>> the district coordinator and after he was removed our district was
>>> dissolved and given to district 2, which is where most of our problems came
>>> from…
>>>
>>> At this point I have no idea if my repeaters are even coordinated
>>> anymore and honestly I don't care, they are on a government building
>>> sponsored by the Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management, and the only
>>> reason I maintain them is because they (MD-OEM) have asked me to.. if it
>>> ever became a problem I would just turn them off… then Miami would have
>>> exactly zero wide-area VHF repeaters and district 2 would finally win
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com <
>>> mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Might give more details of your experience with the FRC.   I think if
>>>> any problems one has with FRC is voiced to the repeater community and the
>>>> FRC, it will be addressed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
>>>>
>>>> Ron Wright, N9EE/R
>>>> BSEE
>>>> Micro Computer Concepts
>>>> 352-683-4476
>>>> mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From:* FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org> on behalf of
>>>> Frank Echanique <ki4ijq at flecom.net>
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 4, 2016 10:28 PM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>>>
>>>> people have had good interactions with the FRC? I can assure you that
>>>> wasn't my experience…
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I have ever dealt with a more dysfunctional organization
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:24 PM, kg4ugk <kg4ugk at kg4ugk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seeing that no one opted in for this email list, FRC did not provide
>>>>> him with contact information, and in fact tried/attempted to keep our
>>>>> information private.
>>>>>
>>>>> And the fact Bryan owns/hosts lists.keekles.org (the server
>>>>> responsible for this newly created list)
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest that you contact his registrar/hosting providers abuse
>>>>> system to form a complaint.
>>>>>
>>>>> Enom.com:
>>>>> abuse at enom.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Registrant Name: BRYAN FIELDS
>>>>> Registrant Organization:
>>>>> Registrant Street: 501 80TH AVE
>>>>> Registrant City: ST PETE BEACH
>>>>> Registrant State/Province: FL
>>>>> Registrant Postal Code: 33706
>>>>> Registrant Country: US
>>>>> Registrant Phone: +1.7274091194
>>>>> Registrant Phone Ext:
>>>>> Registrant Fax: +1.5555555555
>>>>> Registrant Fax Ext:
>>>>> Registrant Email:
>>>>> <http://reversewhois.domaintools.com/?email=c4af5e29ad2bf1ea52b555562b4b59f4>
>>>>> Registrar Abuse Contact: +1.4252982646 abuse at enom.com
>>>>>
>>>>> And as many of us have spoken up about our past successful
>>>>> interactions and the fact Bryan decided to leave them out on this thread,
>>>>> I've decided to copy the 'accused' on this email.
>>>>>
>>>>> He has clearly stated his request for our personal information was
>>>>> with held by the FRC, and that he proceeded to seek alternative means of
>>>>> acquiring our information in an effort to contact us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>>> From: Bob Dunkin <rldunkin at comcast.net>
>>>>> Date: 10/4/16 7:17 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>>>> To: 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion' <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>>>>
>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* vernon ferris <vhferris at comcast.net>
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:09 PM
>>>>> *To:* 'Florida Repeater Council Discussion'
>>>>> <frc-info at lists.keekles.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ron and John,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have dealt with Dana on three repeaters, mine and two that the
>>>>> county turned over to me as ARES EC for the county and as a volunteer
>>>>> himself he has done a good job. And I agree with both of you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a good week and keep your feet dry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vern, W4NEK
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* FRC-Info [mailto:frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 12:43 PM
>>>>> *To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I think you are correct.  Just seems I was not getting replies
>>>>> from others.  have been getting today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is good to have these discussions and the FRC does need guidance
>>>>> from us into repeaters.  Just seems one guy has a beef and wants to take
>>>>> over and he has little to do with repeaters really.  More of a club board
>>>>> member.  And being into the internet service or an IT guy is very little
>>>>> tech knowledge of this subject.  Engineering firms do not consider IT guys
>>>>> technical people.  But they have a valuable place.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the FRC does a good job, but they are often slow.  Our
>>>>> District 4 director has responded to me quickly in last year when i need
>>>>> assistance in getting a pair for a repeater.  not sure what other directors
>>>>> do.  Dana is very slow, I think he picks one Saturday in the month and
>>>>> works on what he has received, hi.  But he is very knowledgeable about the
>>>>> issues...has lots of experience over the last 20 years dealing with the
>>>>> issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron Wright, N9EE/R
>>>>>
>>>>> BSEE
>>>>>
>>>>> Micro Computer Concepts
>>>>>
>>>>> 352-683-4476
>>>>>
>>>>> mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* FRC-Info <frc-info-bounces at lists.keekles.org> on behalf of
>>>>> Jon Pearl - W4ABC <jonpearl at tampabay.rr.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:40 AM
>>>>> *To:* Florida Repeater Council Discussion
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [FRC] FYI... Florida Repeater Council Information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good morning Ron,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible that you're capturing all of the email messages from
>>>>> the FRC list server?  It appears that you've somehow arrived at the
>>>>> decision that all are not allowed to communicate in this venue.  Here are
>>>>> the archives:  http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I posted a message to the group yesterday, and while it appeared to
>>>>> all on the list almost immediately, I personally didn't see it arrive in my
>>>>> own mailbox for quite some time.  I see this happen quite frequently on the
>>>>> Tower-Talk list server.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon Pearl - W4ABC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/3/2016 11:47 AM, mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bryan,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears this discussion is between you and us, not between us and
>>>>> us.  A real discussion would be between all of us.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And once more...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/3/2016 1:25 PM, mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just like this discussion and whoever started it, they are not
>>>>> allowing all to communicate.  Do we want this in FRC???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, ron, n9ee/r a know code Extra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron Wright, N9EE/R
>>>>>
>>>>> BSEE
>>>>>
>>>>> Micro Computer Concepts
>>>>>
>>>>> 352-683-4476
>>>>>
>>>>> mccrpt at tampabay.rr.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Image removed by sender. Avast logo]
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>>
>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>> www.avast.com
>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FRC-Info mailing list
>>>>> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>>>>> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FRC-Info mailing list
>>>>> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>>>>> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FRC-Info mailing list
>>>> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>>>> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FRC-Info mailing list
>>> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>>> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FRC-Info mailing list
>> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
>> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> FRC-Info mailing list
> FRC-Info at lists.keekles.org
> http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frc-info
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161008/d1e415ef/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD145.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/frc-info/attachments/20161008/d1e415ef/attachment-0001.jpg>